Guest alex Posted October 17, 2006 Share Posted October 17, 2006 Also the lowest crowd % related to capacity in the league since 1993 if some people are to be believed. I would imagine that is the case tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted October 17, 2006 Share Posted October 17, 2006 (edited) If the crowds seriously drop, then the reason that Newcastle is so saleable would disappear and Sunderland wouldn't look so far away (figuratively). Anyone worried about that happening? *adds spice* That would be complete financial ruin, and all under Shepherd's stewardship. Edited October 17, 2006 by ObaGol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jusoda Kid 1 Posted October 17, 2006 Share Posted October 17, 2006 Just as an aside, apparently this was the lowest league crowd since the expansion and only the second sub-50,000 crowd. I heard that, the fat man will not like that, thats the only way to get to him tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21125 Posted October 17, 2006 Share Posted October 17, 2006 If the crowds seriously drop, then the reason that Newcastle is so saleable would disappear and Sunderland wouldn't look so far away (figuratively). Anyone worried about that happening? Yes. The fat cunt should have sold up when he had the opportunity tbh. If we lose our attendance we are worth bugger all. Even payment of the mortgage on the ground depends on full attendance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 9691 Posted October 19, 2006 Share Posted October 19, 2006 From .com's match report: And as for the Turkish maestro, a translation of Belozoglu is surely "liability", as he once again showed more interest in squabbling with opponents than beating them with the ball. Frankly it's a continuing mystery what he brings to the party - no goals, no assists, harmless free kicks and a disturbing inability to find a team mate with a pass. We got rid of a bloke who did all that - Faye. Obviously being banned from international football for his loutish behaviour failed to provoke any self-analysis, as his short fuse continues to be very evident. Harsh, but totally fair IMHO. So, I am not the only one (unless it's plagiarism...). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted October 19, 2006 Share Posted October 19, 2006 Aye, a lot of people seem to rate Emre but I'm not one of them. Does very little imo and what he does do is generally within about 10 yards of the centre circle. Perhaps significantly though he isn't my greatest worry by any means at present. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jusoda Kid 1 Posted October 19, 2006 Share Posted October 19, 2006 From .com's match report: And as for the Turkish maestro, a translation of Belozoglu is surely "liability", as he once again showed more interest in squabbling with opponents than beating them with the ball. Frankly it's a continuing mystery what he brings to the party - no goals, no assists, harmless free kicks and a disturbing inability to find a team mate with a pass. We got rid of a bloke who did all that - Faye. Obviously being banned from international football for his loutish behaviour failed to provoke any self-analysis, as his short fuse continues to be very evident. Harsh, but totally fair IMHO. So, I am not the only one (unless it's plagiarism...). Sums Emre up for me, I'm not a fan and wouldn't be too dissapointed if he were to fuck off back to italy as long as we got our money back, Charlie could do his job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21125 Posted October 19, 2006 Share Posted October 19, 2006 Aye, a lot of people seem to rate Emre but I'm not one of them. Does very little imo and what he does do is generally within about 10 yards of the centre circle. Perhaps significantly though he isn't my greatest worry by any means at present. I don't rate Emre or Parker as much as others. Decent players, but they don't control the centre of midfield as much as they should. Thing is though, they are crucial positions if the team is going to play well. Mind, I don't really rate anyone available in our team at the minute. It's easily the worst in a decade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44179 Posted October 19, 2006 Share Posted October 19, 2006 Patrokles is gonna go SPASTIC! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted October 19, 2006 Share Posted October 19, 2006 Aye, a lot of people seem to rate Emre but I'm not one of them. Does very little imo and what he does do is generally within about 10 yards of the centre circle. Perhaps significantly though he isn't my greatest worry by any means at present. I don't rate Emre or Parker as much as others. Decent players, but they don't control the centre of midfield as much as they should. Thing is though, they are crucial positions if the team is going to play well. Mind, I don't really rate anyone available in our team at the minute. It's easily the worst in a decade. I prefer Parker but I'm not sure if he just shines in a wank side by getting stuck in and running his bollocks off tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now