thenorthumbrian 0 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 (edited) Here is an article from True Faith about recent events , just about sums it up... And Rusell Brand is a wanker.. http://www.true-faith.co.uk/html/Press/inthepress.htm Edited September 26, 2006 by thenorthumbrian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima 0 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 (edited) What a shit article written (article) by absolute(article)(article)(article)(article)(article) cretins. Got no doubt(article)(article)(article)(article)(article) about the fact that the Harewood/Given clash(article)(article) was accidental. Edited September 26, 2006 by Sima Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 46325 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 What a shit article written (article) by absolute(article)(article)(article)(article)(article) cretins. Got no doubt(article)(article)(article)(article)(article) about the fact that the Harewood/Given clash(article)(article) was accidental. Couldn't be arsed to read the whole article, but the stuff about Harewood is total bullshit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweetleftpeg 0 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 Harewood's challenge was pretty much the same as Shola's on Kirkland first game of the season...and 50,000 people whinged because the ref stopped play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 I dont know about Harewood, the tackles were flying in and a few of them on him had gone unpunished (whether they were free kicks or not, there was an air of frustration). The atmosphere was hotting up a bit and their fans and players were a bit agitated. Easy in that sort of challenge to hide a bit of malice as it was clearly a 50/50. Not saying defintely but it wouldnt surprise me if there was something in it. The only person who knows that is Harewood, the fat over-rated twat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 46325 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 Thing is though, if you go in for a challenge like that, you don't know who's going to come off worst. It could just as easily have been him. When a player's out to hurt someone they tend to do it in a situation that's more favourable to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 9916 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 Harewood's challenge was pretty much the same as Shola's on Kirkland first game of the season...and 50,000 people whinged because the ref stopped play. Only with the slight difference that the referee at West Ham already had stopped play before because of an offside position of Harewoood... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven 0 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 (edited) Thing is though, if you go in for a challenge like that, you don't know who's going to come off worst. It could just as easily have been him. When a player's out to hurt someone they tend to do it in a situation that's more favourable to them. Given leading with arms and body, Harewood leading with his legs straight out in front him on the deck (no danger of twisting them). I think it was one of them. Dont really want to go on about it but i did think 'ah tell em to fuck off glenn' when he started apologising. Who gives a shit what they think? He should have just 'As much as i'd chop me own knob off to have harewood at newcastle, he is bully and a brute and i dont take kindly to your to your insulting chants' Would have been better. Edited September 26, 2006 by ChezGiven Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerrard 0 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 with that impact...that just sums up how much of a fat bastar# Marlon HArewood is! but I still think he is a great striker..Power and pace and a finisher (not many strikers have all these qualities) I Would really like to see him 4 England mind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerrard 0 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 play for england I mean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatful Of Hollow 0 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 There is an edit function, Scouseman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweetleftpeg 0 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 Harewood's challenge was pretty much the same as Shola's on Kirkland first game of the season...and 50,000 people whinged because the ref stopped play. Only with the slight difference that the referee at West Ham already had stopped play before because of an offside position of Harewoood... Shola also scored against someone last season by diving in where he fucked himself. My point is, I don't blame Harewood going in for a 50-50 like that, I'd expect our forwards to do the same. I'll also give Harewood the benefit of the doubt regarding not knowing he was offisde. Bloody German efficiency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerrard 0 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 There is an edit function, Scouseman. huh?? what edit funtion you on about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 Thing is though, if you go in for a challenge like that, you don't know who's going to come off worst. It could just as easily have been him. When a player's out to hurt someone they tend to do it in a situation that's more favourable to them. Given leading with arms and body, Harewood leading with his legs straight out in front him on the deck (no danger of twisting them). I think it was one of them. Dont really want to go on about it but i did think 'ah tell em to fuck off glenn' when he started apologising. Who gives a shit what they think? He should have just 'As much as i'd chop me own knob off to have harewood at newcastle, he is bully and a brute and i dont take kindly to your to your insulting chants' Would have been better. Easy to say, but I reckon very few of us wouldn't be intimidated by 30,000 angry yobs I think Glenn dealt with it well...he comes out looking like the good guy, he's shown respect to the West Ham "fans" and the consensus is that they're (W.Ham) a bunch of cunts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 46325 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 Thing is though, if you go in for a challenge like that, you don't know who's going to come off worst. It could just as easily have been him. When a player's out to hurt someone they tend to do it in a situation that's more favourable to them. Given leading with arms and body, Harewood leading with his legs straight out in front him on the deck (no danger of twisting them). I think it was one of them. Dont really want to go on about it but i did think 'ah tell em to fuck off glenn' when he started apologising. Who gives a shit what they think? He should have just 'As much as i'd chop me own knob off to have harewood at newcastle, he is bully and a brute and i dont take kindly to your to your insulting chants' Would have been better. Easy to say, but I reckon very few of us wouldn't be intimidated by 30,000 angry yobs I think Glenn dealt with it well...he comes out looking like the good guy, he's shown respect to the West Ham "fans" and the consensus is that they're (W.Ham) a bunch of cunts. Southerners man. Scum of the earth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 Thing is though, if you go in for a challenge like that, you don't know who's going to come off worst. It could just as easily have been him. When a player's out to hurt someone they tend to do it in a situation that's more favourable to them. Given leading with arms and body, Harewood leading with his legs straight out in front him on the deck (no danger of twisting them). I think it was one of them. Dont really want to go on about it but i did think 'ah tell em to fuck off glenn' when he started apologising. Who gives a shit what they think? He should have just 'As much as i'd chop me own knob off to have harewood at newcastle, he is bully and a brute and i dont take kindly to your to your insulting chants' Would have been better. Easy to say, but I reckon very few of us wouldn't be intimidated by 30,000 angry yobs I think Glenn dealt with it well...he comes out looking like the good guy, he's shown respect to the West Ham "fans" and the consensus is that they're (W.Ham) a bunch of cunts. Southerners man. Scum of the earth*. *excludes Scotty Parker, Sir Les Ferdinand, Robert Lee...er Normski...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Boot Boy 0 Posted September 26, 2006 Share Posted September 26, 2006 Read the Russell Brand article, I thought it was quite funny. Like Chez, I don't absolve Harewood of all blame. He must have known that he couldn't get to the ball first and there was little chance that he could come out of the challenge worse off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now