LeazesMag 0 Posted September 16, 2006 Share Posted September 16, 2006 Hook, line and sinker tbh You think I didn't recognise such poor bait as that Just making a point for those who said that Souness should have barrowloads of cash to build his own team. All supplied and generated by the, eeerrr, shite board .... Leazes....Once and for all, and for sweet Jesus' pity.... It's not Freddie's f***ing money! Freddie takes money OUT of the club. The money comes from you, me and all the other mugs who want to see our team do well. *weeps* wtf are you talking about ? Your choice of username - assuming you have any time for the waste of space it is taken after - shows your own judgment to be pretty much that of a mug You don't have to be a "mug" and go to games, assuming you do. When we were shit, 30000 people stayed away and didn't bother, so if you think regular european football is shit, the choice is yours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted Maul 0 Posted September 16, 2006 Share Posted September 16, 2006 Hook, line and sinker tbh You think I didn't recognise such poor bait as that Just making a point for those who said that Souness should have barrowloads of cash to build his own team. All supplied and generated by the, eeerrr, shite board .... Leazes....Once and for all, and for sweet Jesus' pity.... It's not Freddie's f***ing money! Freddie takes money OUT of the club. The money comes from you, me and all the other mugs who want to see our team do well. *weeps* wtf are you talking about ? Your choice of username - assuming you have any time for the waste of space it is taken after - shows your own judgment to be pretty much that of a mug You don't have to be a "mug" and go to games, assuming you do. When we were shit, 30000 people stayed away and didn't bother, so if you think regular european football is shit, the choice is yours. 5th best statement dodger in the world, tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted September 16, 2006 Share Posted September 16, 2006 (edited) Hook, line and sinker tbh You think I didn't recognise such poor bait as that Just making a point for those who said that Souness should have barrowloads of cash to build his own team. All supplied and generated by the, eeerrr, shite board .... Leazes....Once and for all, and for sweet Jesus' pity.... It's not Freddie's f***ing money! Freddie takes money OUT of the club. The money comes from you, me and all the other mugs who want to see our team do well. *weeps* wtf are you talking about ? Your choice of username - assuming you have any time for the waste of space it is taken after - shows your own judgment to be pretty much that of a mug You don't have to be a "mug" and go to games, assuming you do. When we were shit, 30000 people stayed away and didn't bother, so if you think regular european football is shit, the choice is yours. Attendances were down in the 80s for many, many reasons. Are you honestly trying to credit Freddie Shepherd with a: The formation of the Premiership b: The efforts to drive away hooligans c: All seater stadia d: Being John Hall e: Sky TV Freddie Shepherd did not put Newcastle in the strong position they WERE in 10 years ago, but he has put us in the weaker position we are NOW in. Honestly, really, please no more straw men, please Leazes, just facts, don't mention the war, no Ossie Ardilles, just the facts....we're going down hill and we have an interfering chairman who dismisses managerial candidates as betting scams and plays the big shot and chooses players and drains money....he's a laughing stock and he's wrecking our club. Edited September 16, 2006 by Asprilla's foreskin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GafferTape 0 Posted September 16, 2006 Share Posted September 16, 2006 tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44107 Posted September 16, 2006 Author Share Posted September 16, 2006 Hook, line and sinker tbh You think I didn't recognise such poor bait as that Just making a point for those who said that Souness should have barrowloads of cash to build his own team. All supplied and generated by the, eeerrr, shite board .... Leazes....Once and for all, and for sweet Jesus' pity.... It's not Freddie's f***ing money! Freddie takes money OUT of the club. The money comes from you, me and all the other mugs who want to see our team do well. *weeps* wtf are you talking about ? Your choice of username - assuming you have any time for the waste of space it is taken after - shows your own judgment to be pretty much that of a mug You don't have to be a "mug" and go to games, assuming you do. When we were shit, 30000 people stayed away and didn't bother, so if you think regular european football is shit, the choice is yours. Attendances were down in the 80s for many, many reasons. Are you honestly trying to credit Freddie Shepherd with a: The formation of the Premiership b: The efforts to drive away hooligans c: All seater stadia d: Being John Hall e: Sky TV Freddie Shepherd did not put Newcastle in the strong position they WERE in 10 years ago, but he has put us in the weaker position we are NOW in. Honestly, really, please no more straw men, please Leazes, just facts, don't mention the war, no Ossie Ardilles, just the facts....we're going down hill and we have an interfering chairman who dismisses managerial candidates as betting scams and plays the big shot and chooses players and drains money....he's a laughing stock and he's wrecking our club. All of the above is so clear and so obvious that I can barely believe that LM keeps disputing it. We are going backwards FAST under Shepherd. There are very few fans out there that can't see this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted September 16, 2006 Share Posted September 16, 2006 (edited) Hook, line and sinker tbh You think I didn't recognise such poor bait as that Just making a point for those who said that Souness should have barrowloads of cash to build his own team. All supplied and generated by the, eeerrr, shite board .... Leazes....Once and for all, and for sweet Jesus' pity.... It's not Freddie's f***ing money! Freddie takes money OUT of the club. The money comes from you, me and all the other mugs who want to see our team do well. *weeps* wtf are you talking about ? Your choice of username - assuming you have any time for the waste of space it is taken after - shows your own judgment to be pretty much that of a mug You don't have to be a "mug" and go to games, assuming you do. When we were shit, 30000 people stayed away and didn't bother, so if you think regular european football is shit, the choice is yours. Attendances were down in the 80s for many, many reasons. Are you honestly trying to credit Freddie Shepherd with a: The formation of the Premiership b: The efforts to drive away hooligans c: All seater stadia d: Being John Hall e: Sky TV Freddie Shepherd did not put Newcastle in the strong position they WERE in 10 years ago, but he has put us in the weaker position we are NOW in. Honestly, really, please no more straw men, please Leazes, just facts, don't mention the war, no Ossie Ardilles, just the facts....we're going down hill and we have an interfering chairman who dismisses managerial candidates as betting scams and plays the big shot and chooses players and drains money....he's a laughing stock and he's wrecking our club. you miss the point, not that I'm surprised. Newcastle United were the same club, with the same potential, the same fanbase and the same opportunities in the 1960's, 1970's and 1980's as they were post - 1992. If you think our current board are shit, you haven't a clue what one really is. 86 clubs would swap our european qualifications in the last decade for theirs. That means, despite the shite you spout, 86 clubs have not done so well as us. Fact. Do you seriously think that teams such as Oxford, Swindon, Derby, Forest, QPR, West Brom, Southampton, Wolves, Leicester, Leeds, Ipswich, Norwich, Coventry, Wimbledon, Luton and Watford were bigger clubs than Newcastle when they were above us in the league, qualifying for europe and winning domestic trophies when we were nowhere Get a life son, and get a mind of your own after studying these facts, rather than repeating the shite others are telling you. Edited September 16, 2006 by LeazesMag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Missed Sticks 0 Posted September 16, 2006 Share Posted September 16, 2006 The main problem with the club as i see it is our choice of managers, apart from 2 (in Prem years) they've not done well, FACT. If the Board are struggling to attract or maybe choose and appoint the right manager then i think they should find someone to make that choice for them. They need someone on the board with real football knowledge and connections, this is a pre-requisite for any successful board . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 Hook, line and sinker tbh You think I didn't recognise such poor bait as that Just making a point for those who said that Souness should have barrowloads of cash to build his own team. All supplied and generated by the, eeerrr, shite board .... Leazes....Once and for all, and for sweet Jesus' pity.... It's not Freddie's f***ing money! Freddie takes money OUT of the club. The money comes from you, me and all the other mugs who want to see our team do well. *weeps* wtf are you talking about ? Your choice of username - assuming you have any time for the waste of space it is taken after - shows your own judgment to be pretty much that of a mug You don't have to be a "mug" and go to games, assuming you do. When we were shit, 30000 people stayed away and didn't bother, so if you think regular european football is shit, the choice is yours. Attendances were down in the 80s for many, many reasons. Are you honestly trying to credit Freddie Shepherd with a: The formation of the Premiership b: The efforts to drive away hooligans c: All seater stadia d: Being John Hall e: Sky TV Freddie Shepherd did not put Newcastle in the strong position they WERE in 10 years ago, but he has put us in the weaker position we are NOW in. Honestly, really, please no more straw men, please Leazes, just facts, don't mention the war, no Ossie Ardilles, just the facts....we're going down hill and we have an interfering chairman who dismisses managerial candidates as betting scams and plays the big shot and chooses players and drains money....he's a laughing stock and he's wrecking our club. you miss the point, not that I'm surprised. Newcastle United were the same club, with the same potential, the same fanbase and the same opportunities in the 1960's, 1970's and 1980's as they were post - 1992. If you think our current board are shit, you haven't a clue what one really is. 86 clubs would swap our european qualifications in the last decade for theirs. That means, despite the shite you spout, 86 clubs have not done so well as us. Fact. Do you seriously think that teams such as Oxford, Swindon, Derby, Forest, QPR, West Brom, Southampton, Wolves, Leicester, Leeds, Ipswich, Norwich, Coventry, Wimbledon, Luton and Watford were bigger clubs than Newcastle when they were above us in the league, qualifying for europe and winning domestic trophies when we were nowhere Get a life son, and get a mind of your own after studying these facts, rather than repeating the shite others are telling you. ..........have you ever heard of David Icke? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 Hook, line and sinker tbh You think I didn't recognise such poor bait as that Just making a point for those who said that Souness should have barrowloads of cash to build his own team. All supplied and generated by the, eeerrr, shite board .... Leazes....Once and for all, and for sweet Jesus' pity.... It's not Freddie's f***ing money! Freddie takes money OUT of the club. The money comes from you, me and all the other mugs who want to see our team do well. *weeps* wtf are you talking about ? Your choice of username - assuming you have any time for the waste of space it is taken after - shows your own judgment to be pretty much that of a mug You don't have to be a "mug" and go to games, assuming you do. When we were shit, 30000 people stayed away and didn't bother, so if you think regular european football is shit, the choice is yours. Attendances were down in the 80s for many, many reasons. Are you honestly trying to credit Freddie Shepherd with a: The formation of the Premiership b: The efforts to drive away hooligans c: All seater stadia d: Being John Hall e: Sky TV Freddie Shepherd did not put Newcastle in the strong position they WERE in 10 years ago, but he has put us in the weaker position we are NOW in. Honestly, really, please no more straw men, please Leazes, just facts, don't mention the war, no Ossie Ardilles, just the facts....we're going down hill and we have an interfering chairman who dismisses managerial candidates as betting scams and plays the big shot and chooses players and drains money....he's a laughing stock and he's wrecking our club. you miss the point, not that I'm surprised. Newcastle United were the same club, with the same potential, the same fanbase and the same opportunities in the 1960's, 1970's and 1980's as they were post - 1992. If you think our current board are shit, you haven't a clue what one really is. 86 clubs would swap our european qualifications in the last decade for theirs. That means, despite the shite you spout, 86 clubs have not done so well as us. Fact. Do you seriously think that teams such as Oxford, Swindon, Derby, Forest, QPR, West Brom, Southampton, Wolves, Leicester, Leeds, Ipswich, Norwich, Coventry, Wimbledon, Luton and Watford were bigger clubs than Newcastle when they were above us in the league, qualifying for europe and winning domestic trophies when we were nowhere Get a life son, and get a mind of your own after studying these facts, rather than repeating the shite others are telling you. ..........have you ever heard of David Icke? even he talks more sense than you. Your lack of factual responses .... means you can't produce them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 even he talks more sense than you. Your lack of factual responses .... means you can't produce them. Leazes, you're blind. I stated that you couldn't credit Freddie Shepherd for the boom in football interest since the Premiership was formed. I stated that since Freddie Shepherd has been chairman we've been less likely to win the league than under SJH I stated that he dismisses excellent managerial candidates out of hand for the most bizarre reasons. I stated that he interferes too much in transfer dealings. All of those are facts. These are the reasons I would rather someone else would take over the club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 even he talks more sense than you. Your lack of factual responses .... means you can't produce them. Leazes, you're blind. I stated that you couldn't credit Freddie Shepherd for the boom in football interest since the Premiership was formed. I stated that since Freddie Shepherd has been chairman we've been less likely to win the league than under SJH I stated that he dismisses excellent managerial candidates out of hand for the most bizarre reasons. I stated that he interferes too much in transfer dealings. All of those are facts. These are the reasons I would rather someone else would take over the club. you are like your namesake, he was a waste of space too. I stated facts. In the last decade, only 4 teams have qualified for europe more than us. Before 1992, we had qualified for europe 4 times in almost 30 years. You have no source to show the board interfere in transfer dealings, you are making it up. Before the 1992 takeover, good managers were not interested in managing NUFC, even geordie ones ie Bobby Robson and Howard Kendall. The only 3 consecutive top 5 finishes we have managed in over 50 years are with Shepherd as chairman, fact. You do this on merit, the same as 7 european qualifications in a decade. Football is all about clubs going up and down, many clubs have fallen from far higher heights than 2nd in the league to "only" 5th in a decade. Fact. We have no divine right to stay 2nd forever. In some matters the club has gone forward. We have not appointed a manager as good as Keegan, but that is why we are "only" 5th in the last decade. If you are not happy with only 4 clubs being better than us, rather than about 20 in the decades previously, give up your season ticket and force change. I have stated many, many clubs were above us who should not have been ? Why have they not capitalised on sky like we did ? And why were they above us before sky ? Answer the questions, but I will continue to think you are an idiot without a clue unless you provide some factual and reasoned answers, but I doubt very much that you can and will. Only a truly thick cunt can honestly think that anyone has a divine right to finish 2nd forever. If Alan Shearers replacement isn't as good as him, but still does well, does that make him shit ? You're a scream.... clueless and hopeless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 Not again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 Not again Posting on a Sunday? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 even he talks more sense than you. Your lack of factual responses .... means you can't produce them. Leazes, you're blind. I stated that you couldn't credit Freddie Shepherd for the boom in football interest since the Premiership was formed. I stated that since Freddie Shepherd has been chairman we've been less likely to win the league than under SJH I stated that he dismisses excellent managerial candidates out of hand for the most bizarre reasons. I stated that he interferes too much in transfer dealings. All of those are facts. These are the reasons I would rather someone else would take over the club. you are like your namesake, he was a waste of space too. I stated facts. In the last decade, only 4 teams have qualified for europe more than us. Before 1992, we had qualified for europe 4 times in almost 30 years. You have no source to show the board interfere in transfer dealings, you are making it up. Before the 1992 takeover, good managers were not interested in managing NUFC, even geordie ones ie Bobby Robson and Howard Kendall. The only 3 consecutive top 5 finishes we have managed in over 50 years are with Shepherd as chairman, fact. You do this on merit, the same as 7 european qualifications in a decade. Football is all about clubs going up and down, many clubs have fallen from far higher heights than 2nd in the league to "only" 5th in a decade. Fact. We have no divine right to stay 2nd forever. In some matters the club has gone forward. We have not appointed a manager as good as Keegan, but that is why we are "only" 5th in the last decade. If you are not happy with only 4 clubs being better than us, rather than about 20 in the decades previously, give up your season ticket and force change. I have stated many, many clubs were above us who should not have been ? Why have they not capitalised on sky like we did ? And why were they above us before sky ? Answer the questions, but I will continue to think you are an idiot without a clue unless you provide some factual and reasoned answers, but I doubt very much that you can and will. Only a truly thick cunt can honestly think that anyone has a divine right to finish 2nd forever. If Alan Shearers replacement isn't as good as him, but still does well, does that make him shit ? You're a scream.... clueless and hopeless. And you're a deluded cock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 even he talks more sense than you. Your lack of factual responses .... means you can't produce them. Leazes, you're blind. I stated that you couldn't credit Freddie Shepherd for the boom in football interest since the Premiership was formed. I stated that since Freddie Shepherd has been chairman we've been less likely to win the league than under SJH I stated that he dismisses excellent managerial candidates out of hand for the most bizarre reasons. I stated that he interferes too much in transfer dealings. All of those are facts. These are the reasons I would rather someone else would take over the club. you are like your namesake, he was a waste of space too. I stated facts. In the last decade, only 4 teams have qualified for europe more than us. Before 1992, we had qualified for europe 4 times in almost 30 years. You have no source to show the board interfere in transfer dealings, you are making it up. Before the 1992 takeover, good managers were not interested in managing NUFC, even geordie ones ie Bobby Robson and Howard Kendall. The only 3 consecutive top 5 finishes we have managed in over 50 years are with Shepherd as chairman, fact. You do this on merit, the same as 7 european qualifications in a decade. Football is all about clubs going up and down, many clubs have fallen from far higher heights than 2nd in the league to "only" 5th in a decade. Fact. We have no divine right to stay 2nd forever. In some matters the club has gone forward. We have not appointed a manager as good as Keegan, but that is why we are "only" 5th in the last decade. If you are not happy with only 4 clubs being better than us, rather than about 20 in the decades previously, give up your season ticket and force change. I have stated many, many clubs were above us who should not have been ? Why have they not capitalised on sky like we did ? And why were they above us before sky ? Answer the questions, but I will continue to think you are an idiot without a clue unless you provide some factual and reasoned answers, but I doubt very much that you can and will. Only a truly thick cunt can honestly think that anyone has a divine right to finish 2nd forever. If Alan Shearers replacement isn't as good as him, but still does well, does that make him shit ? You're a scream.... clueless and hopeless. And you're a deluded cock you can't dispute the facts ..... So long as you do that, you will always be clueless ... and a wanker too if you still don't have it in you to look at them, and I have posted them to make it easy for you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 even he talks more sense than you. Your lack of factual responses .... means you can't produce them. Leazes, you're blind. I stated that you couldn't credit Freddie Shepherd for the boom in football interest since the Premiership was formed. I stated that since Freddie Shepherd has been chairman we've been less likely to win the league than under SJH I stated that he dismisses excellent managerial candidates out of hand for the most bizarre reasons. I stated that he interferes too much in transfer dealings. All of those are facts. These are the reasons I would rather someone else would take over the club. you are like your namesake, he was a waste of space too. I stated facts. In the last decade, only 4 teams have qualified for europe more than us. Before 1992, we had qualified for europe 4 times in almost 30 years. You have no source to show the board interfere in transfer dealings, you are making it up. Before the 1992 takeover, good managers were not interested in managing NUFC, even geordie ones ie Bobby Robson and Howard Kendall. The only 3 consecutive top 5 finishes we have managed in over 50 years are with Shepherd as chairman, fact. You do this on merit, the same as 7 european qualifications in a decade. Football is all about clubs going up and down, many clubs have fallen from far higher heights than 2nd in the league to "only" 5th in a decade. Fact. We have no divine right to stay 2nd forever. In some matters the club has gone forward. We have not appointed a manager as good as Keegan, but that is why we are "only" 5th in the last decade. If you are not happy with only 4 clubs being better than us, rather than about 20 in the decades previously, give up your season ticket and force change. I have stated many, many clubs were above us who should not have been ? Why have they not capitalised on sky like we did ? And why were they above us before sky ? Answer the questions, but I will continue to think you are an idiot without a clue unless you provide some factual and reasoned answers, but I doubt very much that you can and will. Only a truly thick cunt can honestly think that anyone has a divine right to finish 2nd forever. If Alan Shearers replacement isn't as good as him, but still does well, does that make him shit ? You're a scream.... clueless and hopeless. And you're a deluded cock you can't dispute the facts ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 even he talks more sense than you. Your lack of factual responses .... means you can't produce them. Leazes, you're blind. I stated that you couldn't credit Freddie Shepherd for the boom in football interest since the Premiership was formed. I stated that since Freddie Shepherd has been chairman we've been less likely to win the league than under SJH I stated that he dismisses excellent managerial candidates out of hand for the most bizarre reasons. I stated that he interferes too much in transfer dealings. All of those are facts. These are the reasons I would rather someone else would take over the club. you are like your namesake, he was a waste of space too. I stated facts. In the last decade, only 4 teams have qualified for europe more than us. Before 1992, we had qualified for europe 4 times in almost 30 years. You have no source to show the board interfere in transfer dealings, you are making it up. Before the 1992 takeover, good managers were not interested in managing NUFC, even geordie ones ie Bobby Robson and Howard Kendall. The only 3 consecutive top 5 finishes we have managed in over 50 years are with Shepherd as chairman, fact. You do this on merit, the same as 7 european qualifications in a decade. Football is all about clubs going up and down, many clubs have fallen from far higher heights than 2nd in the league to "only" 5th in a decade. Fact. We have no divine right to stay 2nd forever. In some matters the club has gone forward. We have not appointed a manager as good as Keegan, but that is why we are "only" 5th in the last decade. If you are not happy with only 4 clubs being better than us, rather than about 20 in the decades previously, give up your season ticket and force change. I have stated many, many clubs were above us who should not have been ? Why have they not capitalised on sky like we did ? And why were they above us before sky ? Answer the questions, but I will continue to think you are an idiot without a clue unless you provide some factual and reasoned answers, but I doubt very much that you can and will. Only a truly thick cunt can honestly think that anyone has a divine right to finish 2nd forever. If Alan Shearers replacement isn't as good as him, but still does well, does that make him shit ? You're a scream.... clueless and hopeless. And you're a deluded cock you can't dispute the facts ..... Sadly, your inability to dispute them shows you are wrong, and you know it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 even he talks more sense than you. Your lack of factual responses .... means you can't produce them. Leazes, you're blind. I stated that you couldn't credit Freddie Shepherd for the boom in football interest since the Premiership was formed. I stated that since Freddie Shepherd has been chairman we've been less likely to win the league than under SJH I stated that he dismisses excellent managerial candidates out of hand for the most bizarre reasons. I stated that he interferes too much in transfer dealings. All of those are facts. These are the reasons I would rather someone else would take over the club. you are like your namesake, he was a waste of space too. I stated facts. In the last decade, only 4 teams have qualified for europe more than us. Before 1992, we had qualified for europe 4 times in almost 30 years. You have no source to show the board interfere in transfer dealings, you are making it up. Before the 1992 takeover, good managers were not interested in managing NUFC, even geordie ones ie Bobby Robson and Howard Kendall. The only 3 consecutive top 5 finishes we have managed in over 50 years are with Shepherd as chairman, fact. You do this on merit, the same as 7 european qualifications in a decade. Football is all about clubs going up and down, many clubs have fallen from far higher heights than 2nd in the league to "only" 5th in a decade. Fact. We have no divine right to stay 2nd forever. In some matters the club has gone forward. We have not appointed a manager as good as Keegan, but that is why we are "only" 5th in the last decade. If you are not happy with only 4 clubs being better than us, rather than about 20 in the decades previously, give up your season ticket and force change. I have stated many, many clubs were above us who should not have been ? Why have they not capitalised on sky like we did ? And why were they above us before sky ? Answer the questions, but I will continue to think you are an idiot without a clue unless you provide some factual and reasoned answers, but I doubt very much that you can and will. Only a truly thick cunt can honestly think that anyone has a divine right to finish 2nd forever. If Alan Shearers replacement isn't as good as him, but still does well, does that make him shit ? You're a scream.... clueless and hopeless. And you're a deluded cock you can't dispute the facts ..... Sadly, your inability to dispute them shows you are wrong, and you know it. You are entitled to your opinion as am I, but I have not been swayed by anything you've said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 even he talks more sense than you. Your lack of factual responses .... means you can't produce them. Leazes, you're blind. I stated that you couldn't credit Freddie Shepherd for the boom in football interest since the Premiership was formed. I stated that since Freddie Shepherd has been chairman we've been less likely to win the league than under SJH I stated that he dismisses excellent managerial candidates out of hand for the most bizarre reasons. I stated that he interferes too much in transfer dealings. All of those are facts. These are the reasons I would rather someone else would take over the club. you are like your namesake, he was a waste of space too. I stated facts. In the last decade, only 4 teams have qualified for europe more than us. Before 1992, we had qualified for europe 4 times in almost 30 years. You have no source to show the board interfere in transfer dealings, you are making it up. Before the 1992 takeover, good managers were not interested in managing NUFC, even geordie ones ie Bobby Robson and Howard Kendall. The only 3 consecutive top 5 finishes we have managed in over 50 years are with Shepherd as chairman, fact. You do this on merit, the same as 7 european qualifications in a decade. Football is all about clubs going up and down, many clubs have fallen from far higher heights than 2nd in the league to "only" 5th in a decade. Fact. We have no divine right to stay 2nd forever. In some matters the club has gone forward. We have not appointed a manager as good as Keegan, but that is why we are "only" 5th in the last decade. If you are not happy with only 4 clubs being better than us, rather than about 20 in the decades previously, give up your season ticket and force change. I have stated many, many clubs were above us who should not have been ? Why have they not capitalised on sky like we did ? And why were they above us before sky ? Answer the questions, but I will continue to think you are an idiot without a clue unless you provide some factual and reasoned answers, but I doubt very much that you can and will. Only a truly thick cunt can honestly think that anyone has a divine right to finish 2nd forever. If Alan Shearers replacement isn't as good as him, but still does well, does that make him shit ? You're a scream.... clueless and hopeless. And you're a deluded cock you can't dispute the facts ..... Sadly, your inability to dispute them shows you are wrong, and you know it. You are entitled to your opinion as am I, but I have not been swayed by anything you've said. Well, if you don't want to take notice of facts, that is your problem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 even he talks more sense than you. Your lack of factual responses .... means you can't produce them. Leazes, you're blind. I stated that you couldn't credit Freddie Shepherd for the boom in football interest since the Premiership was formed. I stated that since Freddie Shepherd has been chairman we've been less likely to win the league than under SJH I stated that he dismisses excellent managerial candidates out of hand for the most bizarre reasons. I stated that he interferes too much in transfer dealings. All of those are facts. These are the reasons I would rather someone else would take over the club. you are like your namesake, he was a waste of space too. I stated facts. In the last decade, only 4 teams have qualified for europe more than us. Before 1992, we had qualified for europe 4 times in almost 30 years. You have no source to show the board interfere in transfer dealings, you are making it up. Before the 1992 takeover, good managers were not interested in managing NUFC, even geordie ones ie Bobby Robson and Howard Kendall. The only 3 consecutive top 5 finishes we have managed in over 50 years are with Shepherd as chairman, fact. You do this on merit, the same as 7 european qualifications in a decade. Football is all about clubs going up and down, many clubs have fallen from far higher heights than 2nd in the league to "only" 5th in a decade. Fact. We have no divine right to stay 2nd forever. In some matters the club has gone forward. We have not appointed a manager as good as Keegan, but that is why we are "only" 5th in the last decade. If you are not happy with only 4 clubs being better than us, rather than about 20 in the decades previously, give up your season ticket and force change. I have stated many, many clubs were above us who should not have been ? Why have they not capitalised on sky like we did ? And why were they above us before sky ? Answer the questions, but I will continue to think you are an idiot without a clue unless you provide some factual and reasoned answers, but I doubt very much that you can and will. Only a truly thick cunt can honestly think that anyone has a divine right to finish 2nd forever. If Alan Shearers replacement isn't as good as him, but still does well, does that make him shit ? You're a scream.... clueless and hopeless. And you're a deluded cock you can't dispute the facts ..... Sadly, your inability to dispute them shows you are wrong, and you know it. You are entitled to your opinion as am I, but I have not been swayed by anything you've said. Well, if you don't want to take notice of facts, that is your problem And vice versa ad nauseum........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 even he talks more sense than you. Your lack of factual responses .... means you can't produce them. Leazes, you're blind. I stated that you couldn't credit Freddie Shepherd for the boom in football interest since the Premiership was formed. I stated that since Freddie Shepherd has been chairman we've been less likely to win the league than under SJH I stated that he dismisses excellent managerial candidates out of hand for the most bizarre reasons. I stated that he interferes too much in transfer dealings. All of those are facts. These are the reasons I would rather someone else would take over the club. you are like your namesake, he was a waste of space too. I stated facts. In the last decade, only 4 teams have qualified for europe more than us. Before 1992, we had qualified for europe 4 times in almost 30 years. You have no source to show the board interfere in transfer dealings, you are making it up. Before the 1992 takeover, good managers were not interested in managing NUFC, even geordie ones ie Bobby Robson and Howard Kendall. The only 3 consecutive top 5 finishes we have managed in over 50 years are with Shepherd as chairman, fact. You do this on merit, the same as 7 european qualifications in a decade. Football is all about clubs going up and down, many clubs have fallen from far higher heights than 2nd in the league to "only" 5th in a decade. Fact. We have no divine right to stay 2nd forever. In some matters the club has gone forward. We have not appointed a manager as good as Keegan, but that is why we are "only" 5th in the last decade. If you are not happy with only 4 clubs being better than us, rather than about 20 in the decades previously, give up your season ticket and force change. I have stated many, many clubs were above us who should not have been ? Why have they not capitalised on sky like we did ? And why were they above us before sky ? Answer the questions, but I will continue to think you are an idiot without a clue unless you provide some factual and reasoned answers, but I doubt very much that you can and will. Only a truly thick cunt can honestly think that anyone has a divine right to finish 2nd forever. If Alan Shearers replacement isn't as good as him, but still does well, does that make him shit ? You're a scream.... clueless and hopeless. And you're a deluded cock you can't dispute the facts ..... Sadly, your inability to dispute them shows you are wrong, and you know it. You are entitled to your opinion as am I, but I have not been swayed by anything you've said. Well, if you don't want to take notice of facts, that is your problem And vice versa ad nauseum........ you had better wrap in your season ticket if you aren't happy with regular european football then. Bye Shame you don't attempt to refute my facts like, now that would have been funny, as funny as thinking Arsprilla was a good professional footballer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted Maul 0 Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 Shame you don't attempt to refute my facts like, now that would have been funny, as funny as thinking Arsprilla was a good professional footballer THE FIFTH BEST COMEBACK IN THIS THREAD tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spongebob toonpants 3902 Posted September 17, 2006 Share Posted September 17, 2006 I like Leazes new "hand your season ticket if you disagree with him" line Ive seen it three times today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted September 18, 2006 Share Posted September 18, 2006 you had better wrap in your season ticket if you aren't happy with regular european football then. Bye Shame you don't attempt to refute my facts like, now that would have been funny, as funny as thinking Arsprilla was a good professional footballer Holy fuck, you're mental. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweetleftpeg 0 Posted September 18, 2006 Share Posted September 18, 2006 Tbf, I saw this coming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now