nick1892 0 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 Well that is what the now absolutely terrible 606 boards are saying not exactly holding my breath yet. Apparently some people have recieved one of them official website sms messages sayin that a fees been agreed and having a medical. I smell a bit of bullshit though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 For who? Not us certainly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazarus 0 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 if we sign another striker (at the expense of a defender) Isegrim will go BALLISTIC! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matty 0 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 For who? Not us certainly. 188031[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 9777 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 if we sign another striker (at the expense of a defender) Isegrim will go BALLISTIC! 188032[/snapback] No I won't. You're totally wrong. I always felt that we needed two new strikers. I do think that we need to strengthen the defence as well though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazarus 0 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 if we sign another striker (at the expense of a defender) Isegrim will go BALLISTIC! 188032[/snapback] No I won't. You're totally wrong. I always felt that we needed two new strikers. I do think that we need to strengthen the defence as well though. 188035[/snapback] Again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6682 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 We needed 2 strikers and 2/3 defenders tbh. We've bought 1 striker and a midfielder, therefore anything short of 1 striker and 2 defenders joining tomorrow is unacceptable. They've had 2 months to sort this out! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matty 0 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 We needed 2 strikers and 2/3 defenders tbh. We've bought 1 striker and a midfielder, therefore anything short of 1 striker and 2 defenders joining tomorrow is unacceptable. They've had 2 months to sort this out! 188040[/snapback] 5 shirley? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6682 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 2 when they could actually buy players... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nick1892 0 Posted August 30, 2006 Author Share Posted August 30, 2006 We definately need another striker the defence can wait till January Roeder just needs to play Taylor instead of Bramble and drop Baba and play zoggy at left back and we would be ok till Jan. Would like to add that that this signing probably has more of a chance of happening seen as Neil Mellor is signing for preston. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazarus 0 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 We needed 2 strikers and 2/3 defenders tbh. We've bought 1 striker and a midfielder, therefore anything short of 1 striker and 2 defenders joining tomorrow is unacceptable. They've had 2 months to sort this out! 188040[/snapback] i'd get full backs in first before another striker tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Kenneth Noisewater 0 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 We definately need another striker the defence can wait till January Roeder just needs to play Taylor instead of Bramble and drop Baba and play zoggy at left back and we would be ok till Jan. Would like to add that that this signing probably has more of a chance of happening seen as Neil Mellor is signing for preston. 188044[/snapback] Signing Mellor might mean they are willing to let him go but we wouldn't be the only side in for him (if we're in for him at all). If he goes to Boro and they do a triple-play on us I'll not bother going in to work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 We needed 2 strikers and 2/3 defenders tbh. We've bought 1 striker and a midfielder, therefore anything short of 1 striker and 2 defenders joining tomorrow is unacceptable. They've had 2 months to sort this out! 188040[/snapback] i'd get full backs in first before another striker tbh. 188045[/snapback] Taylor should be at right back. We should be signing a new centre half to replace Boumsong and a new left back to replace Baba. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6682 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 We needed 2 strikers and 2/3 defenders tbh. We've bought 1 striker and a midfielder, therefore anything short of 1 striker and 2 defenders joining tomorrow is unacceptable. They've had 2 months to sort this out! 188040[/snapback] i'd get full backs in first before another striker tbh. 188045[/snapback] Taylor should be at right back. We should be signing a new centre half to replace Boumsong and a new left back to replace Baba. 188091[/snapback] Campbell and Bridge would have done nicely... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 We needed 2 strikers and 2/3 defenders tbh. We've bought 1 striker and a midfielder, therefore anything short of 1 striker and 2 defenders joining tomorrow is unacceptable. They've had 2 months to sort this out! 188040[/snapback] i'd get full backs in first before another striker tbh. 188045[/snapback] Taylor should be at right back. We should be signing a new centre half to replace Boumsong and a new left back to replace Baba. 188091[/snapback] Campbell and Bridge would have done nicely... 188101[/snapback] No chance of Bridge though, unless we went for him at the start of the transfer window. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matty 0 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 There goes that one hope I had left.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44894 Posted August 31, 2006 Share Posted August 31, 2006 Milner out, Nugent in supposedly. I'd be happier with that than Milner staying and us getting no one, but we should be getting Nugent and keeping Milner, not playing one-in, one-out. I feel sorry for Milner as well - never been given a fair crack of the whip here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbyshinton 59 Posted August 31, 2006 Share Posted August 31, 2006 Milner out, Nugent in supposedly. I'd be happier with that than Milner staying and us getting no one, but we should be getting Nugent and keeping Milner, not playing one-in, one-out. I feel sorry for Milner as well - never been given a fair crack of the whip here. 188348[/snapback] Where did you get that from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Boyo 24 Posted August 31, 2006 Share Posted August 31, 2006 Milner out, Nugent in supposedly. I'd be happier with that than Milner staying and us getting no one, but we should be getting Nugent and keeping Milner, not playing one-in, one-out. I feel sorry for Milner as well - never been given a fair crack of the whip here. 188348[/snapback] Your taking a shit aren't you? Where did you get this from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 31, 2006 Share Posted August 31, 2006 Probably bullshit anyway but there's no way anyone should be leaving. Milner can play in a few postions and even in midfield we're short of numbers (although relatively well off). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 9777 Posted August 31, 2006 Share Posted August 31, 2006 Milner out, Nugent in supposedly. I'd be happier with that than Milner staying and us getting no one, but we should be getting Nugent and keeping Milner, not playing one-in, one-out. I feel sorry for Milner as well - never been given a fair crack of the whip here. 188348[/snapback] The problem is that we need bodies in as the squad is too thin. We can't afford to lose more players. And with Solano probably past his best it would be stupid to let someone go can fill in his position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44894 Posted August 31, 2006 Share Posted August 31, 2006 It's in the Independent today, you gonks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44894 Posted August 31, 2006 Share Posted August 31, 2006 Milner out, Nugent in supposedly. I'd be happier with that than Milner staying and us getting no one, but we should be getting Nugent and keeping Milner, not playing one-in, one-out. I feel sorry for Milner as well - never been given a fair crack of the whip here. 188348[/snapback] The problem is that we need bodies in as the squad is too thin. We can't afford to lose more players. And with Solano probably past his best it would be stupid to let someone go can fill in his position. 188353[/snapback] I totally agree. But given the choice between the two, I'd take Nugent's goals over Milner's......erm.......stuff. But I agree that we should be building a squad, not playing swapsies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Boyo 24 Posted August 31, 2006 Share Posted August 31, 2006 Is Glenn looking long term though in regards to Milner....in english, does he think Milner has a future of 1st team football? I mean, we've got Zoggy & Duff who I'd like to think Roeder would be looking to play. I wish it was fecking luque going the other way...! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted August 31, 2006 Share Posted August 31, 2006 Is Glenn looking long term though in regards to Milner....in english, does he think Milner has a future of 1st team football? I mean, we've got Zoggy & Duff who I'd like to think Roeder would be looking to play. I wish it was fecking luque going the other way...! 188358[/snapback] Nugent is a greater talent than Milner though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now