bobbyshinton 59 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 Portsmouth were strongly linked over the summer but Anelka has revealed that Fulham and Blackburn were Bolton's closest rivals for his signature. Taken from an article in sky sports We do not even get a mention? Sorry if I have fucked the copywrite rule, just delete. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweetleftpeg 0 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 Born the wrong side of the Tyne apparently Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21924 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 haven't you heard? we stepped aside to let bolton sign him. would have been bad form on our part to do otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barney 0 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 I don't think we've been after him since Souness left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Li3nZ 1 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 And rightly so. The further away we stay from the opverpaid, underachieving 8million pound waste the better. We all know he would fit in with what seems to be becoming a breeding ground of sulks, non-performers, and effortless donkeys. Would be yet another typical knee-jerk signing when we are in need of QUALITY players. We have had enough of these sort of players through our doors already and lost out financially, lets stick with what we have already instead of signing these players that would make the situation worse! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 7030 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 I think we were interested around the 4-5mil mark. 8 mil is a bit much when hel be off as soon as someone else shows an interest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ally 0 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 Doesn't meet the 'whiter than white' character profile that Roeder wants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark 0 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 2 mill cheaper than Martins, and proven. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4762 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 (edited) 2 mill cheaper than Martins, and proven. 188001[/snapback] Proven attitude problem, proven money grabber Edited August 30, 2006 by Andrew Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 2 mill cheaper than Martins, and proven. 188001[/snapback] Proven attitude problem, proven money grabber 188004[/snapback] When? Proven that his brothers are wankers more like. I don't think many managers have actually had a massive problem with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4762 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 2 mill cheaper than Martins, and proven. 188001[/snapback] Proven attitude problem, proven money grabber 188004[/snapback] When? Proven that his brothers are wankers more like. I don't think many managers have actually had a massive problem with him. 188011[/snapback] Okay then, but it has the same outcome in the end Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 2 mill cheaper than Martins, and proven. 188001[/snapback] Proven attitude problem, proven money grabber 188004[/snapback] When? Proven that his brothers are wankers more like. I don't think many managers have actually had a massive problem with him. 188011[/snapback] Okay then, but it has the same outcome in the end 188013[/snapback] I'd still take him, no problem. Scores goals in this league, which is more than we know about Luque or Martins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4762 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 2 mill cheaper than Martins, and proven. 188001[/snapback] Proven attitude problem, proven money grabber 188004[/snapback] When? Proven that his brothers are wankers more like. I don't think many managers have actually had a massive problem with him. 188011[/snapback] Okay then, but it has the same outcome in the end 188013[/snapback] I'd still take him, no problem. Scores goals in this league, which is more than we know about Luque or Martins. 188015[/snapback] Of him and Martins I prefer Martins, and while it's true he isn't proven in this league he does have all the attributes needed to succeed and score goals as for luque...well there are some things no one can argue for Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted August 30, 2006 Share Posted August 30, 2006 2 mill cheaper than Martins, and proven. 188001[/snapback] Proven attitude problem, proven money grabber 188004[/snapback] When? Proven that his brothers are wankers more like. I don't think many managers have actually had a massive problem with him. 188011[/snapback] Okay then, but it has the same outcome in the end 188013[/snapback] I'd still take him, no problem. Scores goals in this league, which is more than we know about Luque or Martins. 188015[/snapback] Of him and Martins I prefer Martins, and while it's true he isn't proven in this league he does have all the attributes needed to succeed and score goals as for luque...well there are some things no one can argue for 188020[/snapback] Luque had all the attributes too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bombadil 0 Posted August 31, 2006 Share Posted August 31, 2006 Gol, you can add Ibrahimovic to your list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now