Chaser 1276 Posted August 24, 2006 Share Posted August 24, 2006 Can i just say hes much better as an analyst/reporter than a frontman. Without the script hes far improved Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scottish Mag 3 Posted August 24, 2006 Share Posted August 24, 2006 Can i just say hes much better as an analyst/reporter than a frontman. Without the script hes far improved 184612[/snapback] Hes not that great a reporter tbh, before the match kicked off he didn't even know that Martins had actually signed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted August 24, 2006 Share Posted August 24, 2006 Hes not that great a reporter tbh, before the match kicked off he didn't even know that Martins had actually signed. 184613[/snapback] He was commentating recently for one of our matches, and he said a couple of things that I thought were really insightful. Rare enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo 175 Posted August 24, 2006 Share Posted August 24, 2006 I thought Barnes was alright, the one I can't abide is that John Helm, senile old kernt, I cringe every time he insists on calling Emre by his full name..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asprilla 96 Posted August 24, 2006 Share Posted August 24, 2006 I thought Barnes was alright, the one I can't abide is that John Helm, senile old kernt, I cringe every time he insists on calling Emre by his full name..... 184644[/snapback] +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AgentFox 0 Posted August 25, 2006 Share Posted August 25, 2006 I remember listening to one his commentaries one night it was so woeful it nearly sent me to sleep. I also remember the match against Marseille he had such a hardon for drogba that night I don’t even think he praised or said a good word about us. But now that he's down on the touchline and he pipes in with his 2 minute speech i'm cool with that, to be fair it’s not as bad as Ally McCoist's blue table sitting on the pitch in the Champions League Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted August 25, 2006 Share Posted August 25, 2006 I think he's utter crap at both roles Get rid. Get rid of Pat Nevin. Why is channel 5 full of shit commentators ? Nevin is in because he's a jock, Barnes because he's black, and the other guy last night because he's Irish ? All selected on merit, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 25, 2006 Share Posted August 25, 2006 I think he's utter crap at both roles Get rid. Get rid of Pat Nevin. Why is channel 5 full of shit commentators ? Nevin is in because he's a jock, Barnes because he's black, and the other guy last night because he's Irish ? All selected on merit, of course. 185255[/snapback] I think the first two are on because they are ex-footballers. At a guess like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 25, 2006 Share Posted August 25, 2006 Mark Lawrenson is only on BBC because he's so camp. FACT! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted August 25, 2006 Share Posted August 25, 2006 I think he's utter crap at both roles Get rid. Get rid of Pat Nevin. Why is channel 5 full of shit commentators ? Nevin is in because he's a jock, Barnes because he's black, and the other guy last night because he's Irish ? All selected on merit, of course. 185255[/snapback] I think the first two are on because they are ex-footballers. At a guess like. 185257[/snapback] There are plenty of ex footballers around. They both talk shite, and sound like they talk shite, neither speaks clearly, Nevin is marginally clearer than Kenny Dalglish and Walter Smith. The Liverpool connection is Barnes, forget the Chelsea because although Nevin was a decent player Chelsea were shite when he played, like us in fact, run by dickheads, incompetent, no hoper idiots. Ken Bates did score because at least he acted big sometimes, but still couldn't help being a prat. Add Ian Wright, Jamie Redknapp to the crap list, and put Lee Dixon and Alan Shearer as being marginal improvements. Gary Lineker, Andy Gray, Alan Hansen, and Richard Keys beat this shower hands down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted August 25, 2006 Share Posted August 25, 2006 Mark Lawrenson is only on BBC because he's so camp. FACT! 185265[/snapback] have you tried it on with him ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 25, 2006 Share Posted August 25, 2006 I think he's utter crap at both roles Get rid. Get rid of Pat Nevin. Why is channel 5 full of shit commentators ? Nevin is in because he's a jock, Barnes because he's black, and the other guy last night because he's Irish ? All selected on merit, of course. 185255[/snapback] I think the first two are on because they are ex-footballers. At a guess like. 185257[/snapback] There are plenty of ex footballers around. They both talk shite, and sound like they talk shite, neither speaks clearly, Nevin is marginally clearer than Kenny Dalglish and Walter Smith. The Liverpool connection is Barnes, forget the Chelsea because although Nevin was a decent player Chelsea were shite when he played, like us in fact, run by dickheads, incompetent, no hoper idiots. Ken Bates did score because at least he acted big sometimes, but still couldn't help being a prat. Add Ian Wright, Jamie Redknapp to the crap list, and put Lee Dixon and Alan Shearer as being marginal improvements. Gary Lineker, Andy Gray, Alan Hansen, and Richard Keys beat this shower hands down. 185271[/snapback] And that proves your original point how exactly? Or are you just doing your usual trick of completely changing the point you seemed to be making to start with? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 46199 Posted August 25, 2006 Share Posted August 25, 2006 I think Colin Murray does a decent job on 5 with the presenting. He's genuinely enthusiastic, amusing enough and just about knows what he's talking about without trying to take the piss and sound like he's an expert. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 25, 2006 Share Posted August 25, 2006 Mark Lawrenson is only on BBC because he's so camp. FACT! 185265[/snapback] have you tried it on with him ? 185273[/snapback] Put your cock away and answer my question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 22197 Posted August 25, 2006 Share Posted August 25, 2006 I think Colin Murray does a decent job on 5 with the presenting. He's genuinely enthusiastic, amusing enough and just about knows what he's talking about without trying to take the piss and sound like he's an expert. 185278[/snapback] not a bad gig is it? presenting shows on music and football. how the fuck did he wrangle that one? digger barnes must be screwing that he's been relegated to touchline reporter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted August 25, 2006 Share Posted August 25, 2006 (edited) Mark Lawrenson is only on BBC because he's so camp. FACT! 185265[/snapback] have you tried it on with him ? 185273[/snapback] Put your cock away and answer my question. 185279[/snapback] you ARE camp Anyway, I did. My original opinion that they are all crap stands, I don't see where I tried to change anything ? IE...they are selected to appease the PC crowd and that is all Edited August 25, 2006 by LeazesMag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 46199 Posted August 25, 2006 Share Posted August 25, 2006 I think Colin Murray does a decent job on 5 with the presenting. He's genuinely enthusiastic, amusing enough and just about knows what he's talking about without trying to take the piss and sound like he's an expert. 185278[/snapback] not a bad gig is it? presenting shows on music and football. how the fuck did he wrangle that one? digger barnes must be screwing that he's been relegated to touchline reporter. 185281[/snapback] He does the poker as well on one of the dodgy Sky channels, and the american football too I think. Bet he's picking up a canny wage for it all as well, the twat! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 25, 2006 Share Posted August 25, 2006 Mark Lawrenson is only on BBC because he's so camp. FACT! 185265[/snapback] have you tried it on with him ? 185273[/snapback] Put your cock away and answer my question. 185279[/snapback] you ARE camp Anyway, I did. My original opinion that they are all crap stands, I don't see where I tried to change anything ? 185283[/snapback] They're often crap. Nowt to do with where they're from / the colour of their skin which was the point you were originally making. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 46199 Posted August 25, 2006 Share Posted August 25, 2006 Leazes Mag = Alf Garnett. I can just see him sat at home turning to the wife going "Look at THAT! They even let the buggers on telly these days!?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 25, 2006 Share Posted August 25, 2006 Leazes Mag = Alf Garnett. I can just see him sat at home turning to the wife going "Look at THAT! They even let the buggers on telly these days!?" 185293[/snapback] I'm my day.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 25, 2006 Share Posted August 25, 2006 Bring back Archie McPherson I say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted August 25, 2006 Share Posted August 25, 2006 Mark Lawrenson is only on BBC because he's so camp. FACT! 185265[/snapback] have you tried it on with him ? 185273[/snapback] Put your cock away and answer my question. 185279[/snapback] you ARE camp Anyway, I did. My original opinion that they are all crap stands, I don't see where I tried to change anything ? 185283[/snapback] They're often crap. Nowt to do with where they're from / the colour of their skin which was the point you were originally making. 185290[/snapback] not at all, and only someone overly pc correct when there is no need to be, would even think it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazarus 0 Posted August 25, 2006 Share Posted August 25, 2006 (edited) I can just about get awaY with barnes as long as its in small doses and he doesnt jizz on his plasma screen too much. Beresford is TYNETEESTASTIC though. NOT! Edited August 25, 2006 by Lazarus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now