zico martin 105 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 Shearergol said: He won't go to Portsmouth. 182629[/snapback] why not einstein? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor27 0 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 The mention it on SSN as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 Gemmill said: Good luck to him if he goes to Portsmouth tbh. Would be canny gutted if they pipped us to him, but up to him I suppose. I doubt Shepherd's ego could take being beaten to a signing by Portsmouth though, so I think we'll be flexible on wages. Skysports.com is a shambles btw, so if that's the only place reporting it, it could well be cobblers. 182631[/snapback] If he goes to Portsmouth, he's a fucking idiot. Would he be Lua Lua's replacement though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 52239 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 http://www.nufc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsD...~886282,00.html Link to the confirmation that we've agreed a fee btw. Dunno if it's been posted or not. Shepherd saying it's up to them to agree to the terms on offer. We can't afford to lose out on this one to Portsmouth - how embarrassing would that be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima 0 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 alex said: Sima said: Sweet irony in us getting trumped by higher wages for once.... 182622[/snapback] You'd take some sort of sick pleasure in it no doubt. 182625[/snapback] I'm still in two minds over the transfer tbh, as much as we need a striker, the price is extortionate and I'd rather we went for Anelka. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut 496 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 Sima said: alex said: Sima said: Sweet irony in us getting trumped by higher wages for once.... 182622[/snapback] You'd take some sort of sick pleasure in it no doubt. 182625[/snapback] I'm still in two minds over the transfer tbh, as much as we need a striker, the price is extortionate and I'd rather we went for Anelka. 182637[/snapback] And why do you think signing one would be exclusive to the other? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 Sima said: alex said: Sima said: Sweet irony in us getting trumped by higher wages for once.... 182622[/snapback] You'd take some sort of sick pleasure in it no doubt. 182625[/snapback] I'm still in two minds over the transfer tbh, as much as we need a striker, the price is extortionate and I'd rather we went for Anelka. 182637[/snapback] Fair do's. I've not seen a lot of Martins myself. As a player I like Anelka, lot of baggage though, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walkinthedog 0 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 Martin's whacks 'em in Harry's jowels grin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Boyo 24 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 Wor femi! wor femi! wor femi! IS HE! Twenty, thirty, forty four...! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 Optimistic Nut said: Sima said: alex said: Sima said: Sweet irony in us getting trumped by higher wages for once.... 182622[/snapback] You'd take some sort of sick pleasure in it no doubt. 182625[/snapback] I'm still in two minds over the transfer tbh, as much as we need a striker, the price is extortionate and I'd rather we went for Anelka. 182637[/snapback] And why do you think signing one would be exclusive to the other? 182639[/snapback] We don't seem to be in for Anelka though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 alex said: Fair do's. I've not seen a lot of Martins myself. As a player I like Anelka, lot of baggage though, eh? 182640[/snapback] Don't worry, his brothers can help him carry that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut 496 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 alex said: Optimistic Nut said: Sima said: alex said: Sima said: Sweet irony in us getting trumped by higher wages for once.... 182622[/snapback] You'd take some sort of sick pleasure in it no doubt. 182625[/snapback] I'm still in two minds over the transfer tbh, as much as we need a striker, the price is extortionate and I'd rather we went for Anelka. 182637[/snapback] And why do you think signing one would be exclusive to the other? 182639[/snapback] We don't seem to be in for Anelka though. 182643[/snapback] That's sort of my point though. If Roeder was in any way interested in Anelka, signing Martins wouldn't affect that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima 0 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 Optimistic Nut said: Sima said: alex said: Sima said: Sweet irony in us getting trumped by higher wages for once.... 182622[/snapback] You'd take some sort of sick pleasure in it no doubt. 182625[/snapback] I'm still in two minds over the transfer tbh, as much as we need a striker, the price is extortionate and I'd rather we went for Anelka. 182637[/snapback] And why do you think signing one would be exclusive to the other? 182639[/snapback] You mean the price? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 DotBum said: alex said: Fair do's. I've not seen a lot of Martins myself. As a player I like Anelka, lot of baggage though, eh? 182640[/snapback] Don't worry, his brothers can help him carry that. 182644[/snapback] They're the problem aren't they? Fucked up his career very nicely thanks. Loaded though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima 0 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 Optimistic Nut said: alex said: Optimistic Nut said: Sima said: alex said: Sima said: Sweet irony in us getting trumped by higher wages for once.... 182622[/snapback] You'd take some sort of sick pleasure in it no doubt. 182625[/snapback] I'm still in two minds over the transfer tbh, as much as we need a striker, the price is extortionate and I'd rather we went for Anelka. 182637[/snapback] And why do you think signing one would be exclusive to the other? 182639[/snapback] We don't seem to be in for Anelka though. 182643[/snapback] That's sort of my point though. If Roeder was in any way interested in Anelka, signing Martins wouldn't affect that. 182645[/snapback] Ah, now I see. My point was, hypothetically Anelka is a far superior option from a value-for-money perspective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut 496 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 I get what you mean also. Just think if Roeder wanted him, he'd go for him whether he's signed Martins or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 alex said: DotBum said: alex said: Fair do's. I've not seen a lot of Martins myself. As a player I like Anelka, lot of baggage though, eh? 182640[/snapback] Don't worry, his brothers can help him carry that. 182644[/snapback] They're the problem aren't they? Fucked up his career very nicely thanks. Loaded though. 182647[/snapback] Aye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima 0 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 Optimistic Nut said: I get what you mean also. Just think if Roeder wanted him, he'd go for him whether he's signed Martins or not. 182650[/snapback] Not sure if we could afford both tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 zico martin said: Shearergol said: He won't go to Portsmouth. 182629[/snapback] why not einstein? 182632[/snapback] Because they're not in Europe, not likely to get into Europe, have a shite ground, a wanker of a manager, and some bloke in the crowd who annoys the fuck out of everyone there! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zico martin 105 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 Shearergol said: zico martin said: Shearergol said: He won't go to Portsmouth. 182629[/snapback] why not einstein? 182632[/snapback] Because they're not in Europe, not likely to get into Europe, have a shite ground, a wanker of a manager, and some bloke in the crowd who annoys the fuck out of everyone there! 182655[/snapback] oh yeah never thought of that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima 0 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 (edited) Shearergol said: zico martin said: Shearergol said: He won't go to Portsmouth. 182629[/snapback] why not einstein? 182632[/snapback] Because they're not in Europe, not likely to get into Europe, have a shite ground, a wanker of a manager, and some bloke in the crowd who annoys the fuck out of everyone there! 182655[/snapback] They are closer to Lahndan though :| Edited August 22, 2006 by Sima Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 Shearergol said: Because they're not in Europe, not likely to get into Europe, have a shite ground, a wanker of a manager, and some bloke in the crowd who annoys the fuck out of everyone there! 182655[/snapback] I hear he has to mute the sound whenever he watches Pompy play. Seriously, if they can convince him that we're going backwards and they're going forwards, with a big wedge and a no doubt greedy as fuck agent on their side, I would be a little concerned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14251 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 Newcastle>>>>>>>>>>>>>Dog poo>>>>>>>>Dole Que>>>Portsmouth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walkinthedog 0 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 T-Keith said: Newcastle>>>>>>>>>>>>>Dog poo>>>>>>>>Dole Que>>>Portsmouth 182659[/snapback] I saw some white dog poo a few weeks back, thought they'd discontinued it since the eighties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zico martin 105 Posted August 22, 2006 Share Posted August 22, 2006 walkinthedog said: T-Keith said: Newcastle>>>>>>>>>>>>>Dog poo>>>>>>>>Dole Que>>>Portsmouth 182659[/snapback] I saw some white dog poo a few weeks back, thought they'd discontinued it since the eighties. 182660[/snapback] my theory is that it never comes out white and turns over a period of time. these days because owners have to clean up after their dog there are less left for long enough to turn white. I know Im probably wrong like but its a theory anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now