Craig 6702 Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 Suppose I had a clip, uploaded onto a site and provided the link on some other website; then gave a link to that website here. Im sure that would be illegal too, is it?? 166105[/snapback] The whole crux of the clip in question is that you have to pay to watch it. If it's posted on YouTube, it's evading that payment. Would it be right for us to walk through an open gate at SJP rather than pay for a ticket? 166140[/snapback] Thanks for clearing things up. I disagree slightly with you on the matter, however. Now, hacking off clips from Newcastle World would be unfair since those clips belong completely to the club. But suppose Im capping clips from Sky or BBC, im paying for those channels and the club itself gets a good deal of money in broadcasting rights etc from those channels. Thus in my opinion its fair to have a ban on distributing clips from Newcastle World, but not from other sources. Even if the clips reach people who havent subscribed for those channels, the club shouldnt be bothered. The fee they get more than compensates for that in my opnion. 166312[/snapback] If Sky turn around and ask for clips of something that was displayed on one of their channels to be removed, they are well within their rights as they own the copyright and it is allowing the possibility of someone who has not paid a subscription to view their material. Same goes for the BBC really because people who have not paid the TV licence would be able to view material. The only 'safe' submissions to YouTube are effectively home-made clips 166327[/snapback] What excatly would qualify as 'home-made'? I thought home-made compilations are banned as well. 166331[/snapback] Home-made?? Camcorder stuff - you filmed it, you own it! 166340[/snapback] like the video of imogen that her ex boyfriend released on the net 166353[/snapback] And the link is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zico martin 95 Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 Suppose I had a clip, uploaded onto a site and provided the link on some other website; then gave a link to that website here. Im sure that would be illegal too, is it?? 166105[/snapback] The whole crux of the clip in question is that you have to pay to watch it. If it's posted on YouTube, it's evading that payment. Would it be right for us to walk through an open gate at SJP rather than pay for a ticket? 166140[/snapback] Thanks for clearing things up. I disagree slightly with you on the matter, however. Now, hacking off clips from Newcastle World would be unfair since those clips belong completely to the club. But suppose Im capping clips from Sky or BBC, im paying for those channels and the club itself gets a good deal of money in broadcasting rights etc from those channels. Thus in my opinion its fair to have a ban on distributing clips from Newcastle World, but not from other sources. Even if the clips reach people who havent subscribed for those channels, the club shouldnt be bothered. The fee they get more than compensates for that in my opnion. 166312[/snapback] If Sky turn around and ask for clips of something that was displayed on one of their channels to be removed, they are well within their rights as they own the copyright and it is allowing the possibility of someone who has not paid a subscription to view their material. Same goes for the BBC really because people who have not paid the TV licence would be able to view material. The only 'safe' submissions to YouTube are effectively home-made clips 166327[/snapback] What excatly would qualify as 'home-made'? I thought home-made compilations are banned as well. 166331[/snapback] Home-made?? Camcorder stuff - you filmed it, you own it! 166340[/snapback] like the video of imogen that her ex boyfriend released on the net 166353[/snapback] And the link is? 166357[/snapback] entrapment tbh pm? hehe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6702 Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 Who do you think I am, the internet police? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khay 10 Posted July 28, 2006 Author Share Posted July 28, 2006 Who do you think I am, the internet police? 166362[/snapback] Batman of the internet tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6702 Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 Who do you think I am, the internet police? 166362[/snapback] Batman of the internet tbh. 166371[/snapback] fame at last! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toonraider 0 Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 Suppose I had a clip, uploaded onto a site and provided the link on some other website; then gave a link to that website here. Im sure that would be illegal too, is it?? 166105[/snapback] The whole crux of the clip in question is that you have to pay to watch it. If it's posted on YouTube, it's evading that payment. Would it be right for us to walk through an open gate at SJP rather than pay for a ticket? 166140[/snapback] Thanks for clearing things up. I disagree slightly with you on the matter, however. Now, hacking off clips from Newcastle World would be unfair since those clips belong completely to the club. But suppose Im capping clips from Sky or BBC, im paying for those channels and the club itself gets a good deal of money in broadcasting rights etc from those channels. Thus in my opinion its fair to have a ban on distributing clips from Newcastle World, but not from other sources. Even if the clips reach people who havent subscribed for those channels, the club shouldnt be bothered. The fee they get more than compensates for that in my opnion. 166312[/snapback] If Sky turn around and ask for clips of something that was displayed on one of their channels to be removed, they are well within their rights as they own the copyright and it is allowing the possibility of someone who has not paid a subscription to view their material. Same goes for the BBC really because people who have not paid the TV licence would be able to view material. The only 'safe' submissions to YouTube are effectively home-made clips 166327[/snapback] What excatly would qualify as 'home-made'? I thought home-made compilations are banned as well. 166331[/snapback] Home-made?? Camcorder stuff - you filmed it, you own it! 166340[/snapback] like the video of imogen that her ex boyfriend released on the net 166353[/snapback] or like the clip of Shearer singing along to U2 in his car Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6702 Posted July 28, 2006 Share Posted July 28, 2006 like the video of imogen that her ex boyfriend released on the net 166353[/snapback] Well now that I've perused the said video, I suspect that when she realises that it's been released in the open it probably won't be the first time she's been disappointed.... And if I was the boyfriend, there's no way I'd have let that in the open - two minute taffy tbh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now