North Korea

[Ken 119]

9 hours ago, Rayvin said:

 

What did you study?

Political Science

[wolfy 12]

18 hours ago, Dr Gloom said:

 

keep telling yourself that, you utter fruitcake

I certainly will, gullible lad.

[wolfy 12]

17 hours ago, Ken said:

The future of your nation is in safe hands with people like you in it.

It's in safe hands as far as incoming nuclear missiles are concerned, because they do not exist and never will.

The best anyone can do is to drop conventional bombs from planes or fire short range missiles with conventional war heads.

As far as North Korea throwing all kinds of WMD around. It's a complete and utter joke on the all eager public to hang on to joke news.

[Renton 21974]

46 minutes ago, wolfy said:

It's in safe hands as far as incoming nuclear missiles are concerned, because they do not exist and never will.

The best anyone can do is to drop conventional bombs from planes or fire short range missiles with conventional war heads.

As far as North Korea throwing all kinds of WMD around. It's a complete and utter joke on the all eager public to hang on to joke news.

If you believe short range missiles  exist, what is your issue with long range missiles which work on the same principal but are more powerful?

 

Let me guess, it's something to do with denpressure or they would bounce off the roof of the ice dome. 

[wolfy 12]

24 minutes ago, Renton said:

If you believe short range missiles  exist, what is your issue with long range missiles which work on the same principal but are more powerful?

 

 

Fuel required and height required to achieve a long distance target from an arced missile.

Unless they put plane wings on the missile and have it take off like a plane, then their targets will only ever be localised.

[Renton 21974]

41 minutes ago, wolfy said:

Fuel required and height required to achieve a long distance target from an arced missile.

Unless they put plane wings on the missile and have it take off like a plane, then their targets will only ever be localised.

Oh aye? Show me your calculations to prove this. 

[wolfy 12]

27 minutes ago, Renton said:

Oh aye? Show me your calculations to prove this. 

No calculations required.

 

[Renton 21974]

1 minute ago, wolfy said:

No calculations required.

 

Thought not. What a prick you are. 

[wolfy 12]

Just now, Renton said:

Thought not. What a prick you are. 

No calculations required.

[Dr Gloom 22134]

2 minutes ago, wolfy said:

No calculations required.

 

 

Why bother with calculations when you can pluck a theory out of thin air? 

 

what a mong  

[wolfy 12]

Just now, Dr Gloom said:

 

Why bother with calculations when you can pluck a theory out of thin air? 

 

what a mong  

Just common sense and logic and the ability not to always fall for propaganda.

[Dr Gloom 22134]

Ah, I get it. Without any empirical evidence to support your wild claims you're going for  the keep saying it enough makes it fact approach  

[Renton 21974]

1 minute ago, wolfy said:

Just common sense and logic and the ability not to always fall for propaganda.

 

Not common sense. If it was common, other people would agree with you or at least see your point of view; they don't.

 

Not logic. If you believe a missile can travel a certain distance, then it's logical to assume a more powerful missile can travel further. Tell me, without calculations, why not. You can't can you?  

[Renton 21974]

2 minutes ago, Dr Gloom said:

Ah, I get it. Without any empirical evidence to support your wild claims you're going for  the keep saying it enough makes it fact approach  

 

Wolfy has said in the past he doesn't believe in mathematics. Really. 

[wolfy 12]

Just now, Dr Gloom said:

Ah, I get it. Without any empirical evidence to support your wild claims you're going for  the keep saying it enough makes it fact approach  

Who has evidence?

You have news media  and you accept it when it suits and refuse to accept it when it suits.

That's the nature of the beast.

When your head's filled with propaganda you can follow it with interest as if it were all above board and as true to the word and nobody will change your mind.

However, when you can blatantly see the games being played in many aspects, then you owe it to yourself to question everything and not accept anything as a truth until you are sure, with media.

[wolfy 12]

4 minutes ago, Ant said:

 

it really isn't, what do you do for work?

I'm semi retired with a stake in an innovation company that I once was a full partner in.

 

[Renton 21974]

8 minutes ago, wolfy said:

Who has evidence?

You have news media  and you accept it when it suits and refuse to accept it when it suits.

That's the nature of the beast.

When your head's filled with propaganda you can follow it with interest as if it were all above board and as true to the word and nobody will change your mind.

However, when you can blatantly see the games being played in many aspects, then you owe it to yourself to question everything and not accept anything as a truth until you are sure, with media.

An A level maths or physics student has evidence that you are far too stupid to understand.

 

Since you can't do the most basic maths, in your own words tell me why a more powerfulossile can't fly further than a less powerful one. Can you do that? 

[wolfy 12]

4 minutes ago, Renton said:

 

Quote

Not common sense. If it was common, other people would agree with you or at least see your point of view; they don't.

It really is common sense. Unfortunately real common sense is suppressed by that very TV screen or radio or newspaper that is paraded before you.

 

 

4 minutes ago, Renton said:

Not logic. If you believe a missile can travel a certain distance, then it's logical to assume a more powerful missile can travel further. Tell me, without calculations, why not. You can't can you?  

A more powerful missile requires a more powerful thrust and more fuel in order to achieve it. A BALLISTIC missile goes against itself in terms of gaining much more height, with fuel to weight ratio.

Basically speaking, the bigger you get the weaker the missile becomes, in terms of structure and ultimately would basically collapse on the launch pad or not even get off the ground.

ICBM'S do not exist.

[Renton 21974]

1 minute ago, wolfy said:

It really is common sense. Unfortunately real common sense is suppressed by that very TV screen or radio or newspaper that is paraded before you.

 

 

A more powerful missile requires a more powerful thrust and more fuel in order to achieve it. A BALLISTIC missile goes against itself in terms of gaining much more height, with fuel to weight ratio.

Basically speaking, the bigger you get the weaker the missile becomes, in terms of structure and ultimately would basically collapse on the launch pad or not even get off the ground.

ICBM'S do not exist.

Yeah, have you any evidence for this though? What's the maximum distance they can travel? Please show calculations. 

[wolfy 12]

12 minutes ago, Renton said:

 

Wolfy has said in the past he doesn't believe in mathematics. Really. 

Mathematics work when realistic calculations are used for realistic things.

It can also be used in manipulation or basically nonsensical equations.

 

[Renton 21974]

Just now, wolfy said:

Mathematics work when realistic calculations are used for realistic things.

It can also be used in manipulation or basically nonsensical equations.

 

 

How do you know this? If I recall you are mathematically illiterate. 

[wolfy 12]

3 minutes ago, Renton said:

An A level maths or physics student has evidence that you are far too stupid to understand.

 

Since you can't do the most basic maths, in your own words tell me why a more powerfulossile can't fly further than a less powerful one. Can you do that? 

A more powerful missile can fly farther. I never said it couldn't.

What those missiles can't do is go inter continentally by ballistic launching.

 

[wolfy 12]

3 minutes ago, Renton said:

Yeah, have you any evidence for this though? What's the maximum distance they can travel? Please show calculations. 

A ballistic missile is just a large firework with a different outer casing and packed nose.

That's it.

It can be dressed up in all kinds of ways but the reality is, it's a basic firework.

 

[wolfy 12]

4 minutes ago, Renton said:

 

How do you know this? If I recall you are mathematically illiterate. 

I imagine you could recall a lot of things. Maybe a spoiled childhood or a recollection of once driving your uncles car, when you were really only sat on his knee going BRUM BRUM.

 

It's amazing what people can recall.

[TheGingerQuiff 2412]

I'm beginning to think that the time wolfy spent sat on his uncle's lap could explain a few things. Did you question stuff back then wolfs? Whether he was really your uncle, perhaps.