sweetleftpeg 0 Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 Very naughty. Muscle flexing exercise? Or something more sinister? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holden McGroin 6583 Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 Very naughty. Muscle flexing exercise? Or something more sinister? 156564[/snapback] Testing the water.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazarus 0 Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 Arnt we about to replace our nuclear submarine fleet ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 Could have had someones eye out tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15525 Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 Could have had someones eye out tbh 156573[/snapback] Could have had a Jap's eye out tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magelaide 0 Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 I've been to Nth Korea. It's horrid, why can't they test it on (and nuke) themselves? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweetleftpeg 0 Posted July 5, 2006 Author Share Posted July 5, 2006 'Ronery! I am so ronery!' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 Could have had a Jap's eye out tbh 156577[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rikko 20 Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 Arnt we about to replace our nuclear submarine fleet ? 156569[/snapback] Nope, we are currently in the process of refitting all our nuclear submarines. The process takes along time 3-5 years per submarine ( the actual refit isnt that long, but the sea trials etc take ages). All the small ones are done now, with only a few vanguards left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10857 Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 isn't the weapon called "type o Dong"? that's funny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 When do we invade then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10857 Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 Arnt we about to replace our nuclear submarine fleet ? 156569[/snapback] Nope, we are currently in the process of refitting all our nuclear submarines. The process takes along time 3-5 years per submarine ( the actual refit isnt that long, but the sea trials etc take ages). All the small ones are done now, with only a few vanguards left. 156605[/snapback] AH HA! you're going to work for the department of submarine... making... that's why you needed the security check! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rikko 20 Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 Arnt we about to replace our nuclear submarine fleet ? 156569[/snapback] Nope, we are currently in the process of refitting all our nuclear submarines. The process takes along time 3-5 years per submarine ( the actual refit isnt that long, but the sea trials etc take ages). All the small ones are done now, with only a few vanguards left. 156605[/snapback] AH HA! you're going to work for the department of submarine... making... that's why you needed the security check! 156616[/snapback] Pretty much right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10857 Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 I'm a Super Sleuth, I'm a bad ass Sherlock Holmes Mother Fucker! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted Maul 0 Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 When do we invade then? 156615[/snapback] Never. No oil = No invasion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 When do we invade then? 156615[/snapback] Never. No oil = No invasion 156638[/snapback] Damn Commies tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazarus 0 Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 Arnt we about to replace our nuclear submarine fleet ? 156569[/snapback] Nope, we are currently in the process of refitting all our nuclear submarines. The process takes along time 3-5 years per submarine ( the actual refit isnt that long, but the sea trials etc take ages). All the small ones are done now, with only a few vanguards left. 156605[/snapback] i knew i'd heard something about it - were gonna replace both the subs and the missiles by 2024 - less than 20 years time. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/5103764.stm wont these new kit have to be tested? and then tested again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 When do we invade then? 156615[/snapback] Never. No oil = No invasion 156638[/snapback] Damn Commies tbh. 156650[/snapback] Where is Leazes btw? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 He became such a parody of himself that he split into 2 physical entities, this worked out fine for a while as they both agreed with everything the other said, until they got into a heated debate over the best way to assemble a hi-fi system. Things turned violent and they imploded on impact as the 2 couldn't exist in the same dimension. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodgate27 0 Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 On our local news last night they tried to suggest that North Korea would send one of those nukes our way Scaremongering at its finest! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted Maul 0 Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 On our local news last night they tried to suggest that North Korea would send one of those nukes our way Scaremongering at its finest! 156832[/snapback] Why bomb Australia? 70% of it looks like a nuclear wasteland anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodgate27 0 Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 On our local news last night they tried to suggest that North Korea would send one of those nukes our way Scaremongering at its finest! 156832[/snapback] Why bomb Australia? 70% of it looks like a nuclear wasteland anyway. 156835[/snapback] I would say 70% plus Sydney. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mags 1 Posted July 6, 2006 Share Posted July 6, 2006 When do we invade then? 156615[/snapback] *Ahem* That would be where my country steps in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted July 6, 2006 Share Posted July 6, 2006 On our local news last night they tried to suggest that North Korea would send one of those nukes our way Scaremongering at its finest! 156832[/snapback] Why bomb Australia? 70% of it looks like a nuclear wasteland anyway. 156835[/snapback] 95% TBh and we tested A bombs there in the 50's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now