Cheating bastard refs

[Guest alex]

Ahyone got the Zog challenge on that queer cunt?  My mate is convinced it was a pen, I wanna show him that gay cunt went down quicker than elton jophn

12277[/snapback]

It's funny how people think it's ok to make homophobic remarks like this. You wouldn't say 'that black ****' and expect to get away with it, so why do you think what you've wrote above is ok?

12279[/snapback]

The only potentially offensive part of that post from wykikitoon was the use of the 'c' word.

 

It's funny how people don't get upset by bad language in posts, use of the 'c' word in particular, and yet get upset by a harmless reference to 'gay'.

12288[/snapback]

I think calling someone a 'gay cunt' is offensive. You think it's harmless.

12291[/snapback]

To be more accurate, you think mentioning the word 'gay' is offensive. I don't. I think calling someone a 'c***' is offensive. You don't.

 

Calling someone a 'gay c***' is offensive because of the use of the foul language, not because of the word gay.

12314[/snapback]

In your opinion, I disagree.

12315[/snapback]

 

Ok, just to be clear on what you're saying.

 

If a person known to be gay is described as such by someone, that's offensive.

 

If a person is described by another as a 'c***', that isn't offensive.

 

I can't ever agree with that particular strange set of standards.

 

Even putting this on one side, because I expect some people will find both offensive, I'm wondering why you're upset by use of the gay word, but don't appear to care about people using the c*** word. Is this a word you find acceptable in general conversation, while getting on your moral soapbox when people mention the word gay?

12317[/snapback]

No, you've completely misinterpreted me.

[Guest alex]

Ahyone got the Zog challenge on that queer cunt?  My mate is convinced it was a pen, I wanna show him that gay cunt went down quicker than elton jophn

12277[/snapback]

It's funny how people think it's ok to make homophobic remarks like this. You wouldn't say 'that black ****' and expect to get away with it, so why do you think what you've wrote above is ok?

12279[/snapback]

The only potentially offensive part of that post from wykikitoon was the use of the 'c' word.

 

It's funny how people don't get upset by bad language in posts, use of the 'c' word in particular, and yet get upset by a harmless reference to 'gay'.

12288[/snapback]

I think calling someone a 'gay cunt' is offensive. You think it's harmless.

12291[/snapback]

To be more accurate, you think mentioning the word 'gay' is offensive. I don't. I think calling someone a 'c***' is offensive. You don't.

 

Calling someone a 'gay c***' is offensive because of the use of the foul language, not because of the word gay.

12314[/snapback]

In your opinion, I disagree.

12315[/snapback]

 

Ok, just to be clear on what you're saying.

 

If a person known to be gay is described as such by someone, that's offensive.

 

If a person is described by another as a 'c***', that isn't offensive.

 

I can't ever agree with that particular strange set of standards.

 

Even putting this on one side, because I expect some people will find both offensive, I'm wondering why you're upset by use of the gay word, but don't appear to care about people using the c*** word. Is this a word you find acceptable in general conversation, while getting on your moral soapbox when people mention the word gay?

12317[/snapback]

 

 

Is Lundberg deinitely gay though?

 

And can I now say that Ambrose is???

12334[/snapback]

Allegedly

[adios 717]

Ljungberg's not actually gay to my knowledge, I know someone who went out with him. Could be bi I suppose, I wasn't really trying to suggest that though, he's not black either, or is that racist...

 

EDIT: And I've just realised this is in response to a question that wasn't directed at me, sorry.

Edited August 15, 2005 by DotBum

[Howaythelads 0]

When you're finished arguing with Alex I'd love a response on what I thought was a fairly well reasoned argument posted by myself above.

12322[/snapback]

 

I thought your response was a good one.

 

I'm not arguing with Alex by the way. Just curious why he finds a word that isn't abusive to be offensive, and a word that is definitely very abusive to be inoffensive.

[Howaythelads 0]

Ljungberg's not actually gay to my knowledge, I know someone who went out with him. Could be bi I suppose, I wasn't really trying to suggest that though, he's not black either, or is that racist...

 

EDIT:  And I've just realised this is in response to a question that wasn't directed at me, sorry.

12346[/snapback]

 

I don't know either ( and couldn't care less ) whether Ljungberg or Ambrose are homs.

[Howaythelads 0]

No, you've completely misinterpreted me.

12343[/snapback]

 

I think this was a major misinterpretation on your part......

 

"I think calling someone a 'gay c***' is offensive. You think it's harmless."

That sentence is offensive, but not because of the word gay. I doubt if anything I posted indicates I think the above is harmless.

[Guest alex]

When you're finished arguing with Alex I'd love a response on what I thought was a fairly well reasoned argument posted by myself above.

12322[/snapback]

 

I thought your response was a good one.

 

I'm not arguing with Alex by the way. Just curious why he finds a word that isn't abusive to be offensive, and a word that is definitely very abusive to be inoffensive.

12406[/snapback]

I didn't say that though. I would normally explain what I meant but, seeing as it's you, I won't bother

[Howaythelads 0]

When you're finished arguing with Alex I'd love a response on what I thought was a fairly well reasoned argument posted by myself above.

12322[/snapback]

 

I thought your response was a good one.

 

I'm not arguing with Alex by the way. Just curious why he finds a word that isn't abusive to be offensive, and a word that is definitely very abusive to be inoffensive.

12406[/snapback]

I didn't say that though. I would normally explain what I meant but, seeing as it's you, I won't bother

12414[/snapback]

I know what you meant Alex. I also know what you said.

[Guest alex]

When you're finished arguing with Alex I'd love a response on what I thought was a fairly well reasoned argument posted by myself above.

12322[/snapback]

 

I thought your response was a good one.

 

I'm not arguing with Alex by the way. Just curious why he finds a word that isn't abusive to be offensive, and a word that is definitely very abusive to be inoffensive.

12406[/snapback]

I didn't say that though. I would normally explain what I meant but, seeing as it's you, I won't bother

12414[/snapback]

I know what you meant Alex. I also know what you said.

12422[/snapback]

What I wrote you mean?

[Howaythelads 0]

When you're finished arguing with Alex I'd love a response on what I thought was a fairly well reasoned argument posted by myself above.

12322[/snapback]

 

I thought your response was a good one.

 

I'm not arguing with Alex by the way. Just curious why he finds a word that isn't abusive to be offensive, and a word that is definitely very abusive to be inoffensive.

12406[/snapback]

I didn't say that though. I would normally explain what I meant but, seeing as it's you, I won't bother

12414[/snapback]

I know what you meant Alex. I also know what you said.

12422[/snapback]

What I wrote you mean?

12424[/snapback]

Aye, that.