LeazesMag 0 Posted June 16, 2006 Author Share Posted June 16, 2006 right Leazes lets get sumit straight, this threads gone to shit, I tried to sort it by asking a few simple questions to both you and Renton, he answered them you appear to be ignoring them, either answer the questions or Im locking the thread and people will make of that what they will, my own view will be that you didnt have the bollocks to give some honest answers. 149536[/snapback] What you really want is an answer to question 1 [for Rentons sake]. I replied. As I am told I should learn to read, I think most of you lot should learn to read. If I have to spell it out, the answer has two letters in it. I am busy, I will hopefully come back to the rest when I have time. 149545[/snapback] AY? YE? I want an answer to them all, that way all the shite thats gone before from both sides can be put to rest. 149549[/snapback] quick answers on howaythetoon. I have to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted June 16, 2006 Author Share Posted June 16, 2006 Leazes mate, if you think my replies have become 'glib' in this thread, that's probably because I gave up trying to debate this point with you some time ago. Quite frankly, I'm amazed others are still trying to do so given the abuse you hurl at anyone who disagrees with you (or even people who have attempted to make light of the subject) and your general pig-headedness. 149551[/snapback] who said THIS thread !!! For your info, Alex, once again, Renton started the abuse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21636 Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 (edited) What it does prove though is that Leazes doesnt read a fucking word that is written by anyone else, if it doesnt say "I agree with Leazes" at the start then he skips it, either that or he needs a refund on the speed reading course he bought! As you've already pointed out SLP has (as he always does) took the piss out of all sides throughout this and every other thread, not once put forward a left wing view yet what is LM called him? oh aye a "deluded, appeasing, left wing cunt" and to top it off uses the most blatant misuse of a smilie ever tbh 149227[/snapback] Suggest you look at Bridgets and PL's posts that I agreed with PP. They prove I read posts. When they talk sense, they get a sensible reply. 149259[/snapback] That answer proves my point though, all you've done there is refer to to two posts where you replied sensibly to a post you agreed with, what Im saying is you appear to skim, see theyre not backing you up (regardless of what stance they are taking) and automatically spout the abuse, NOTHING in any post of SLPs has he taken a left wing stance but he got the abuse thrown his way. 149270[/snapback] PP, if he calls me a "racialist" .... am I not entitled to call him back ? And - he is the one who said "there is no middle ground", so he's either a "right wing racialist" or a "left wing do gooder". He implied it himself. If YOU read the post properly mate, you'll see that. If I thought for a moment he was up for a proper debate, I would have replied that there is of course middle ground, there is always middle ground in any view. 149277[/snapback] If its justified then yes, course you can however you would have had to had a total humour bypass to have read that post as anything other than a pisstake. For fucks sake he ends it with "all hail emperor Meenzer" or sumit. 149282[/snapback] I've tried to resist biting on this, but enough. Having a medical qualification makes you no more or less qualified to comment on the subjects in this thread. However your continued insinuations that having a medical degree actually makes you more stupid are ridiculous beyond belief. If this is what you believe then I can only hope that any medical attention you recieve in the future is from people as dim as you assume them to be, as you don't really deserve anything else. 149445[/snapback] As I've said before, how do you know anything about me ? You shouldn't make assumptions. I would say that someone who has an understanding of a subject, lets say defence and security, has as much understanding of medical matters as someone who has an understanding of medical matters has of defence and security. So - why does Renton insist he knows all about defence and security ? Have I, for instance, insisted I know about medical matters ? I wouldn't do that, because I don't. Is that a difficult concept ? 149531[/snapback] I explained that I understood that concept in my post. It's higlighted in bold. What I took issue with was your consistent insinuations that not only did a medical qualification not help you understand defence issues, but possessing one actually inhibited your ability to come to grips with it. Which is bollocks. 149542[/snapback] As I have said at least three times now, the subject of education came up precisely because me, Alex, and Rikko (I think) thought they were irrelevant to this debate at hand. Yet despite this, Leazes still obsesses about them. Basically he's a sad case who can't understand the simplest of concepts. Any discussions with him are completely pointless as a result; it took me a while to appreciate this, but it will become obvious to nearly everyone in time. My suggestion is to just put him on ignore - at least that way you don't feel you have to respond to his pointless digs, lies and misinterpretations. Edited June 16, 2006 by Renton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 Leazes mate, if you think my replies have become 'glib' in this thread, that's probably because I gave up trying to debate this point with you some time ago. Quite frankly, I'm amazed others are still trying to do so given the abuse you hurl at anyone who disagrees with you (or even people who have attempted to make light of the subject) and your general pig-headedness. 149551[/snapback] who said THIS thread !!! For your info, Alex, once again, Renton started the abuse. 149562[/snapback] I give up tbh. You've abused practically everyone on this thread who disagreed with you, not just Renton (a common trait when you lose your blob on any matter). I noticed that while I was still trying to debate with you on this matter you said you didn't have time for several of my questions. You had time to put words into the mouths of others and accuse people of not answering your questions though of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 7034 Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 I havent been in argument on here for a month! whats gannin on! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweetleftpeg 0 Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 I havent been in argument on here for a month! whats gannin on! 149571[/snapback] Are you left wing or right wing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted June 16, 2006 Author Share Posted June 16, 2006 What it does prove though is that Leazes doesnt read a fucking word that is written by anyone else, if it doesnt say "I agree with Leazes" at the start then he skips it, either that or he needs a refund on the speed reading course he bought! As you've already pointed out SLP has (as he always does) took the piss out of all sides throughout this and every other thread, not once put forward a left wing view yet what is LM called him? oh aye a "deluded, appeasing, left wing cunt" and to top it off uses the most blatant misuse of a smilie ever tbh 149227[/snapback] Suggest you look at Bridgets and PL's posts that I agreed with PP. They prove I read posts. When they talk sense, they get a sensible reply. 149259[/snapback] That answer proves my point though, all you've done there is refer to to two posts where you replied sensibly to a post you agreed with, what Im saying is you appear to skim, see theyre not backing you up (regardless of what stance they are taking) and automatically spout the abuse, NOTHING in any post of SLPs has he taken a left wing stance but he got the abuse thrown his way. 149270[/snapback] PP, if he calls me a "racialist" .... am I not entitled to call him back ? And - he is the one who said "there is no middle ground", so he's either a "right wing racialist" or a "left wing do gooder". He implied it himself. If YOU read the post properly mate, you'll see that. If I thought for a moment he was up for a proper debate, I would have replied that there is of course middle ground, there is always middle ground in any view. 149277[/snapback] If its justified then yes, course you can however you would have had to had a total humour bypass to have read that post as anything other than a pisstake. For fucks sake he ends it with "all hail emperor Meenzer" or sumit. 149282[/snapback] I've tried to resist biting on this, but enough. Having a medical qualification makes you no more or less qualified to comment on the subjects in this thread. However your continued insinuations that having a medical degree actually makes you more stupid are ridiculous beyond belief. If this is what you believe then I can only hope that any medical attention you recieve in the future is from people as dim as you assume them to be, as you don't really deserve anything else. 149445[/snapback] As I've said before, how do you know anything about me ? You shouldn't make assumptions. I would say that someone who has an understanding of a subject, lets say defence and security, has as much understanding of medical matters as someone who has an understanding of medical matters has of defence and security. So - why does Renton insist he knows all about defence and security ? Have I, for instance, insisted I know about medical matters ? I wouldn't do that, because I don't. Is that a difficult concept ? 149531[/snapback] I explained that I understood that concept in my post. It's higlighted in bold. What I took issue with was your consistent insinuations that not only did a medical qualification not help you understand defence issues, but possessing one actually inhibited your ability to come to grips with it. Which is bollocks. 149542[/snapback] As I have said at least three times now, the subject of education came up precisely because me, Alex, and Rikko (I think) thought they were irrelevant to this debate at hand. Yet despite this, Leazes still obsesses about them. Basically he's a sad case who can't understand the simplest of concepts. Any discussions with him are completely pointless as a result; it took me a while to appreciate this, but it will become obvious to nearly everyone in time. My suggestion is to just put him on ignore - at least that way you don't feel you have to respond to his pointless digs, lies and misinterpretations. 149565[/snapback] or a big baby who just wants to take his dolls home when he is proved to be talking rubbish. Like you are doing now. The concept of shooting someone before they shoot you is fairly simple, but you can't see that. Carry on insulting Renton, then blame someone else for insulting ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21636 Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 I havent been in argument on here for a month! whats gannin on! 149571[/snapback] Your viewpoints on anything are worthless to LM apparently, because of your viewpoints on Bellamy. Another stunning incite into how LM's mind works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar 0 Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 (edited) Is this shit still fucking going? Can people not learn that if you want an actual debate instead of 25 pages of "If you don't agree with me you want innocent people blown up and child molesters roaming the streets" then go and have a debate with someone who can actually form an argument? Edited June 16, 2006 by BlueStar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob W 0 Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 "your general pig-headedness." No wonder he can't go to Saudi Arabia to get some REAL punishments in........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 I havent been in argument on here for a month! whats gannin on! 149571[/snapback] Your viewpoints on anything are worthless to LM apparently, because of your viewpoints on Bellamy. Another stunning incite into how LM's mind works. 149584[/snapback] I'm weeping for your editor tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21636 Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 I havent been in argument on here for a month! whats gannin on! 149571[/snapback] Your viewpoints on anything are worthless to LM apparently, because of your viewpoints on Bellamy. Another stunning incite into how LM's mind works. 149584[/snapback] I'm weeping for your editor tbh. 149727[/snapback] I am shamed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44936 Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 Do I get a prize for realising many months ago (while the master, Souness was still in charge) that arguing with LM is an exercise in futility? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peasepud 59 Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 Do I get a prize for realising many months ago (while the master, Souness was still in charge) that arguing with LM is an exercise in futility? 149757[/snapback] tbf LM was quite mild mannered and forgiving until he encountered you and your Souness obsession. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sima Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 tbh I started the abuse in the first reply Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckyluke 2 Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 Do I get a prize for realising many months ago (while the master, Souness was still in charge) that arguing with LM is an exercise in futility? 149757[/snapback] It hardly takes a genius to spot that tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44936 Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 Do I get a prize for realising many months ago (while the master, Souness was still in charge) that arguing with LM is an exercise in futility? 149757[/snapback] It hardly takes a genius to spot that tbh. 149762[/snapback] And yet here we are, 28 pages.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peasepud 59 Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 quick answers on howaythetoon. I have to go. 149560[/snapback] I used to think that you were actually Freddy Shepherd however Ive now come to the conclusion that your actually an aspiring politician and seeing as you havent even answered the first question properly yet then maybe it is for some new 3 lettered named party. You've refused to answer the questions here stating that you havent got time yet you go on that other forum thingy with Pilchard, wacky and the other one and make out that its a Poll we're running? strange, I cant seem to remember ever mentioning the word poll in it, in fact you'd be running a strange sort of howaythtoon type poll with only two respondents (sorry scratch that only Renton). So for the benefit of this thread and those who can be arsed to follow it anymore. And more importantly for the benefit of Renton who I think has been proven to NOT have strange fancy dan views, doesnt think we should give terrorists a cup of tea and slice of cake and hasnt once used a medical degree as a reason why he should now more about Security issues than you. So for those reasons, I'll copy and paste the "POLL" from Howaythetoon onto here so people can get a rough idea of your answers and compare them to what you've been saying. 1. Do you support the BNP? No 2. Are you a member of the communist party? No 3. What newspaper do you read? I now use the internet for all my informatiom 4. Who in your view constitutes a threat? All muslims, British muslims, immigrants, other (please specify). Anyone who wont abide by the laws of the land 5. What punishment should be given to suicide bombers? Strange Question how many suicide bombers are caught alive? 6. Should we have a shoot to kill policy? Of Course 7. Innocent til proven guilty or guilty til proven innocent? WE CAN NOT CHANGE THE PREMIS THAT YOU MUST BE PROVEN TO BE GUILTY 8. Terrorists should be given community service and a cup of tea. Agree? If community Service meant having thier heads down a loo for 90 years then yes 9. The hijackers that were allowed to stay, good or bad? They can drink thier cup of tea on the way back Afghanistan. slightly obsessed with something, I reckon Sad thing is, they might believe the result of their vote will be a reflection of the general public. Strangely too mate, although you think we differ quite wildly, I would say I agree with you in 7 of those. I would add more to numbers 4 and 7 but thats all. So then, I reckon Mr Leazes will make a fine politician, always ducking the questions and even denying their existence in some strange "what the fucks that???" kind of way! I bow down to you mate, you really are a star, comedy at its best. I think the outcome of this thread (which will be locked in an hour) now stands at RENTON 5 LEAZES NIL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21636 Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 Before this thread is closed, can I nominate it for BROWN ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sima Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 Fucking Michael Jackson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15552 Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 That seems a suitably random way to end it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted June 16, 2006 Author Share Posted June 16, 2006 Is this shit still fucking going? Can people not learn that if you want an actual debate instead of 25 pages of "If you don't agree with me you want innocent people blown up and child molesters roaming the streets" then go and have a debate with someone who can actually form an argument? 149617[/snapback] Like you ? As you moronically all chant at once "we can't shoot terrorists until they prove they are terrorists by shooting first, and we can't lock up kiddy fiddlers and rapists because they to a few years in the nick then they have served their sentenec and have rights" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted June 16, 2006 Author Share Posted June 16, 2006 Leazes mate, if you think my replies have become 'glib' in this thread, that's probably because I gave up trying to debate this point with you some time ago. Quite frankly, I'm amazed others are still trying to do so given the abuse you hurl at anyone who disagrees with you (or even people who have attempted to make light of the subject) and your general pig-headedness. 149551[/snapback] who said THIS thread !!! For your info, Alex, once again, Renton started the abuse. 149562[/snapback] I give up tbh. You've abused practically everyone on this thread who disagreed with you, not just Renton (a common trait when you lose your blob on any matter). I noticed that while I was still trying to debate with you on this matter you said you didn't have time for several of my questions. You had time to put words into the mouths of others and accuse people of not answering your questions though of course. 149568[/snapback] For your info Alex, again, Renton started the abuse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar 0 Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 (edited) Is this shit still fucking going? Can people not learn that if you want an actual debate instead of 25 pages of "If you don't agree with me you want innocent people blown up and child molesters roaming the streets" then go and have a debate with someone who can actually form an argument? 149617[/snapback] Like you ? As you moronically all chant at once "we can't shoot terrorists until they prove they are terrorists by shooting first, and we can't lock up kiddy fiddlers and rapists because they to a few years in the nick then they have served their sentenec and have rights" 149797[/snapback] Exactly what I mean. You're not capable of debating anyone's point, so you make up another argument that's easier for you. It's like putting the gutter bumpers up when you're crap at bowling so you can still join in. Edited June 16, 2006 by BlueStar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted June 16, 2006 Author Share Posted June 16, 2006 (edited) quick answers on howaythetoon. I have to go. 149560[/snapback] I used to think that you were actually Freddy Shepherd however Ive now come to the conclusion that your actually an aspiring politician and seeing as you havent even answered the first question properly yet then maybe it is for some new 3 lettered named party. You've refused to answer the questions here stating that you havent got time yet you go on that other forum thingy with Pilchard, wacky and the other one and make out that its a Poll we're running? strange, I cant seem to remember ever mentioning the word poll in it, in fact you'd be running a strange sort of howaythtoon type poll with only two respondents (sorry scratch that only Renton). So for the benefit of this thread and those who can be arsed to follow it anymore. And more importantly for the benefit of Renton who I think has been proven to NOT have strange fancy dan views, doesnt think we should give terrorists a cup of tea and slice of cake and hasnt once used a medical degree as a reason why he should now more about Security issues than you. So for those reasons, I'll copy and paste the "POLL" from Howaythetoon onto here so people can get a rough idea of your answers and compare them to what you've been saying. 1. Do you support the BNP? No 2. Are you a member of the communist party? No 3. What newspaper do you read? I now use the internet for all my informatiom 4. Who in your view constitutes a threat? All muslims, British muslims, immigrants, other (please specify). Anyone who wont abide by the laws of the land 5. What punishment should be given to suicide bombers? Strange Question how many suicide bombers are caught alive? 6. Should we have a shoot to kill policy? Of Course 7. Innocent til proven guilty or guilty til proven innocent? WE CAN NOT CHANGE THE PREMIS THAT YOU MUST BE PROVEN TO BE GUILTY 8. Terrorists should be given community service and a cup of tea. Agree? If community Service meant having thier heads down a loo for 90 years then yes 9. The hijackers that were allowed to stay, good or bad? They can drink thier cup of tea on the way back Afghanistan. slightly obsessed with something, I reckon Sad thing is, they might believe the result of their vote will be a reflection of the general public. Strangely too mate, although you think we differ quite wildly, I would say I agree with you in 7 of those. I would add more to numbers 4 and 7 but thats all. So then, I reckon Mr Leazes will make a fine politician, always ducking the questions and even denying their existence in some strange "what the fucks that???" kind of way! I bow down to you mate, you really are a star, comedy at its best. I think the outcome of this thread (which will be locked in an hour) now stands at RENTON 5 LEAZES NIL 149772[/snapback] Believe it or not, I don't have time. Why do you dispute that people go to work and don't have time ? Almost as blind as your refusal to accept that its OK for Renton to start abusing someone who disagrees with him, but not when he gets a similar reply. I have answered your post on howaythetoon, seeing as you copied an entry from it, along with my reason for not giving all the answers on here. I think this whole thing is amazing. Plainly only rabid left winger do gooders would take such an incredible stance against someone, just because they don't agree with them. I bet you are all holding hands in a circle. And I think a few people on here should get a life. Just remember PP, every bomb that goes off, is a bomb planted by someone who either shouldn't be here, or someone who we lacked the resources or powerful enough legislation to find and/or stop. That is why a bill is going through increasing police powers. Now did anyone answer that when I mentioned it earlier ..... Edited June 16, 2006 by LeazesMag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now