Scottish Mag 3 Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 NEWCASTLE United have confirmed they will appeal against Stephen Carr's red card in Sunday's 1-0 victory over Chelsea at St. James' Park. The Republic of Ireland international was dismissed by referee Mike Riley for violent conduct 15 minutes from time following a challenge on Lassana Diarra. The Magpies will appeal to the Football Association on the grounds of wrongful dismissal. If the appeal fails, however, Carr will serve a four-game ban at the start of next season. That is because it was his second sending off in the 2005/06 campaign after he picked up a retrospective red card in the 3-2 win against Sunderland back in October. Carr was booked against the Black Cats but he also picked up a second yellow after the game when Newcastle appealed against Scott Parker's booking on the grounds of mistaken identity, and it was transferred to Carr's record. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 20820 Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 Riley should be looked at, isnt that his 4th red against us this season? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hggcraig 0 Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 Riley is a hom, he was blatantly biased towards Chelsea yesterday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
themags 0 Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 looking at the brief highlights on match of the day did Carr even touch him? also do chelsea think it's professional to surround the ref trying to get players sent off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 46093 Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 It won't get overturned. He definitely did something even though it wasn't much. The only way you'll get something overturned is if the referee got something completely wrong. The fact that he even gestured towards stamping/kicking/whatever will be enough for the FA not to rescind it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghoulert 0 Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 Riley hates humans. What the FA dont tell us is that hes really an alien, which would explain his fucking huge head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sima Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 Riley is a hom, he was blatantly biased towards Chelsea yesterday 133449[/snapback] Yeah, that's why he sent Babayaro off. Oh wait....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 46093 Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 Riley is a hom, he was blatantly biased towards Chelsea yesterday 133449[/snapback] Yeah, that's why he sent Babayaro off. Oh wait....... 133589[/snapback] Wasn't a red card offence tbh. It got the yellow it deserved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papa Lazaru 0 Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 Riley is a hom, he was blatantly biased towards Chelsea yesterday 133449[/snapback] Yeah, that's why he sent Babayaro off. Oh wait....... 133589[/snapback] Oh wait, he didn't send him off because it wasn't a red card, because he wasn;'t last man. But don't let the facts get in the way of another amazing post. And if you don't think he was biassed explain to us how Gallas' assault on Zog wasn't even a yellow, how 3 times he allowed Chelsea players to surround him and booked none of them, how 3 times he stood and told their wall where to stand and then allowed them to ignore him, etc. etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sima Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 Riley is a hom, he was blatantly biased towards Chelsea yesterday 133449[/snapback] Yeah, that's why he sent Babayaro off. Oh wait....... 133589[/snapback] Wasn't a red card offence tbh. It got the yellow it deserved. 133593[/snapback] Surely if he was biased it would have been? Not worked that part out eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sima Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 Oh wait, he didn't send him off because it wasn't a red card, because he wasn;'t last man. But don't let the facts get in the way of another amazing post. And if you don't think he was biassed explain to us how Gallas' assault on Zog wasn't even a yellow, how 3 times he allowed Chelsea players to surround him and booked none of them, how 3 times he stood and told their wall where to stand and then allowed them to ignore him, etc. etc. 133645[/snapback] The wall not moving back isn't exclusive to Chelsea tbh. At least half of the teams in the league do it ffs. Christ we're turning into scousers the amount of pity we have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papa Lazaru 0 Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 (edited) Oh wait, he didn't send him off because it wasn't a red card, because he wasn;'t last man. But don't let the facts get in the way of another amazing post. And if you don't think he was biassed explain to us how Gallas' assault on Zog wasn't even a yellow, how 3 times he allowed Chelsea players to surround him and booked none of them, how 3 times he stood and told their wall where to stand and then allowed them to ignore him, etc. etc. 133645[/snapback] The wall not moving back isn't exclusive to Chelsea tbh. At least half of the teams in the league do it ffs. Christ we're turning into scousers the amount of pity we have. 133656[/snapback] Its funny but i don't recall saying the wall thing was exclusive to Chelsea, in fact i didn't criticise them at all for it because they are quite rightly trying to play on the edge of the rules. Its Riley i'm having a go at for being shite at his job and being a ref who probably above all others is up the arse of the top 4 teams as shown by letting them get away with what they liked, and making decsions after they'd surrounded him (for which he never once booked a single player) Edited May 8, 2006 by Papa Lazaru Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghoulert 0 Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 Anyone got a vid/gif of the carr incident? Would love to see doughboy tackle someone for a change Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 46093 Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 Riley is a hom, he was blatantly biased towards Chelsea yesterday 133449[/snapback] Yeah, that's why he sent Babayaro off. Oh wait....... 133589[/snapback] Wasn't a red card offence tbh. It got the yellow it deserved. 133593[/snapback] Surely if he was biased it would have been? Not worked that part out eh? 133655[/snapback] So if a referee is biased, every yellow card offence will become a red one. Didn't realise that like. Having said that, I don't think he was biased, just incompetent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Sima Posted May 8, 2006 Share Posted May 8, 2006 So if a referee is biased, every yellow card offence will become a red one. Didn't realise that like. Having said that, I don't think he was biased, just incompetent. 133666[/snapback] eh? where did I say that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeazesMag 0 Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 He's a dirty bastard Carr like, lets be honest. And we are better when he plays ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckyluke 2 Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 He's a dirty bastard Carr like, lets be honest. And we are better when he plays ! 133856[/snapback] He looks like a thug as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 Having seen it again, the Carr sending off shouldn't even have been a yellow. Total joke but I doubt it will be rescinded as they'll probably say there was intent etc. We still won though, so who cares? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckyluke 2 Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 Will he miss the first few games of next season though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 46093 Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 With any luck we'll have a new right back by then anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 Will he miss the first few games of next season though? 133903[/snapback] Four games as he got a retrospective red card when Scott Parker got one in a case of mistaken identity against the mackems at home. So he's been sent off twice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckyluke 2 Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 Will he miss the first few games of next season though? 133903[/snapback] Four games as he got a retrospective red card when Scott Parker got one in a case of mistaken identity against the mackems at home. So he's been sent off twice. 133908[/snapback] It's annoying that the FA will bend over backwards to ban players, but not to rescind red cards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 46093 Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 It's been overturned. Jesus, I can't believe it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toonraider 0 Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 He's a dirty bastard Carr like, lets be honest. And we are better when he plays ! 133856[/snapback] He looks like a thug as well. 133857[/snapback] yeah he does, he appears to have no neck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 9906 Posted May 9, 2006 Share Posted May 9, 2006 It's been overturned. Jesus, I can't believe it. 134041[/snapback] Compassion tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now