Meenzer 15742 Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 Not a bad idea though is it. If you get caught for doing something dodgy, post all the details on a forum and then claim you wouldn't get a fair trial. 127811[/snapback] So you're saying that Craig is the mystery perv? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 Not a bad idea though is it. If you get caught for doing something dodgy, post all the details on a forum and then claim you wouldn't get a fair trial. 127811[/snapback] So you're saying that Craig is the mystery perv? 127812[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6700 Posted April 26, 2006 Author Share Posted April 26, 2006 me too! the case, if it gets to court, will be chucked out anyway cos theres evidence posted all over the internet now! 127546[/snapback] Have a fucking word with yourselves man, planet earth is back down here! 127561[/snapback] just cos your arse is twtiching like a rabbits now 127576[/snapback] WTF are you on about? 127708[/snapback] the fact that if this gets to court and its found out that evidence is on the internet and has provoked a 4 page discussion over his guilt or innocence then it will be chucked out. you say its not important evidence but its the file list in question FFS! we did a little bit about trial by media in my law a-level and whilst this in no way makes me an expert im sure your company bosses wouldnt be chuffed that you fucked up their court case against the local paedo 127762[/snapback] The only reason I could see for this interfering with a trial is if the guy couldn't get a fair trial because of the thread i.e. it influenced the jury. Tbh this forum is hardly the mass media and the chances of a potential juror viewing this thread is remote to say the least. Its not like we're dealing with the Sunday rags causing a retrial like in the Woodgate/Bowyer case. 127772[/snapback] i know that, but there are plenty of lurkers on here from N-O. any solicitor worth his salt would be trying to get his client off by any means neccesary and if by a small chance word of this thread got round it would be like all his xmas's arriving at once. not saying he will like, and i know chances are itl never leave this board . . . . but . . . . i hope craigs conscience could cope if he contributed to a paedo getting off on a technicality like that 127781[/snapback] Jesus fucking wept...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 7191 Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 (edited) my feelings exactly! i know that you are oblivious to any sort of sarcasm in my posts but the rest of the posters in here seem to get it Edited April 26, 2006 by J69 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 me too! the case, if it gets to court, will be chucked out anyway cos theres evidence posted all over the internet now! 127546[/snapback] Have a fucking word with yourselves man, planet earth is back down here! 127561[/snapback] just cos your arse is twtiching like a rabbits now 127576[/snapback] WTF are you on about? 127708[/snapback] the fact that if this gets to court and its found out that evidence is on the internet and has provoked a 4 page discussion over his guilt or innocence then it will be chucked out. you say its not important evidence but its the file list in question FFS! we did a little bit about trial by media in my law a-level and whilst this in no way makes me an expert im sure your company bosses wouldnt be chuffed that you fucked up their court case against the local paedo 127762[/snapback] The only reason I could see for this interfering with a trial is if the guy couldn't get a fair trial because of the thread i.e. it influenced the jury. Tbh this forum is hardly the mass media and the chances of a potential juror viewing this thread is remote to say the least. Its not like we're dealing with the Sunday rags causing a retrial like in the Woodgate/Bowyer case. 127772[/snapback] i know that, but there are plenty of lurkers on here from N-O. any solicitor worth his salt would be trying to get his client off by any means neccesary and if by a small chance word of this thread got round it would be like all his xmas's arriving at once. not saying he will like, and i know chances are itl never leave this board . . . . but . . . . i hope craigs conscience could cope if he contributed to a paedo getting off on a technicality like that 127781[/snapback] Jesus fucking wept...... 127835[/snapback] I know! I imagine he's the only person on here who thinks you've got any sort of conscience at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazarus 0 Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 i think we need a smily with a flasher-mac' motif just for this thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6700 Posted April 26, 2006 Author Share Posted April 26, 2006 my feelings exactly! i know that you are oblivious to any sort of sarcasm in my posts but the rest of the posters in here seem to get it 127837[/snapback] Aye right, a four page page thread on an intranet forum which outlines neither the company, the location or the individual is gonna stand as a case collapser! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 7191 Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 this really is whooshing you isnt it. that laughing smilie at the end of the post indictated that i didnt really think this thread was going to get him off. you even quoted me saying i was being sarcastic. keep up! . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6700 Posted April 26, 2006 Author Share Posted April 26, 2006 this really is whooshing you isnt it. that laughing smilie at the end of the post indictated that i didnt really think this thread was going to get him off. you even quoted me saying i was being sarcastic. keep up! . 127849[/snapback] Then why fucking bring it up in the first place you fucking mong! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 7191 Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 to fucking watch you fucking get fucking nervous you fucking mong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6700 Posted April 26, 2006 Author Share Posted April 26, 2006 to fucking watch you fucking get fucking nervous you fucking mong 127855[/snapback] tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 J69, were you being sarcastic about Chris Sutton too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc-mag 1 Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 ladiespleasetbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 46176 Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 So you're saying that Craig is the mystery perv? 127812[/snapback] Ask yourself one question, is the the serene, contented face of a man who's just enjoyed the dubious pleasures of kiddy porn? http://www.toontastic.net/forum/uploads/photo-3.jpg EDIT (Craig): Howay man, don't post it about..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol 0 Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 Craig, why edit it and still leave it there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 Sorry man, take it out all together if you want. I'm beginning to believe J69 about your arse twitching, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckypierre 0 Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 J69, were you being sarcastic about Chris Sutton too? 127857[/snapback] fuckin hell, give it a rest man. You've never had an opinion on something that was wrong like Gol? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 Some people are just born lost without smilies tbh 127635[/snapback] It was the meaning, not the tone tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 46176 Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 Craig is running scared tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 fuckin hell, give it a rest man. You've never had an opinion on something that was wrong like Gol? 127872[/snapback] Are you really suggesting Sutton should have made PFA XI of the year? He joined Birmingham too late for a start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6700 Posted April 26, 2006 Author Share Posted April 26, 2006 Craig is running scared tbh. 127874[/snapback] Am I? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 46176 Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 Craig is running scared tbh. 127874[/snapback] Am I? 127877[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6700 Posted April 26, 2006 Author Share Posted April 26, 2006 Craig is running scared tbh. 127874[/snapback] Am I? 127877[/snapback] 127878[/snapback] OK, whatever you say..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted Maul 0 Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 Typical paedo. In denial that what he has done is wrong tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now