Jump to content

General Random Conversation..


Scottish Mag
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Ant said:

@Asprilla your return is the oddest comeback on here i've witnessed in a while , driven by the latest newcastle news but literally spending no time discussing it and instead dived straight into the contrary general chat pool looking to play devils advocate for the stupidest of topics.

 bizarre

 

 

 

I have posted there. Not as much admittedly.

 

I do like ruffling feathers when people are so easy to wind up.

 

I believe some of what I post :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Asprilla said:

No, not really. I don't care if you think I'm a cunt but I won't be accused of being a nonce. Stop it.

I'm not saying you definitely are a nonce, but you can understand why people are suggesting it, right? I mean, I'm just asking questions, here. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Asprilla said:

No, not really. I don't care if you think I'm a cunt but I won't be accused of being a nonce. Stop it.

 

 

You're doing it to yourself. It's been noticed by more than me, there's barely a message board in the country which will tolerate appeasement of paedophilia in the way you have the last couple of days. Like I said, I think the SMB is more your style. 

Like Gemmill, I've said my piece. I'm out too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, The Fish said:

Come on lads, he's just asking questions. I mean, what if Prince Andrew wasn't using his power and influence to have sex with young girls, but instead they were forcing themselves on him? Yeah? Have you thought about that?

Maybe they weren't so innocent? Sure , they were being forced to hang around old rich men, but is Prince Andrew really to blame if they were doing it in a provocative way?

God! All he wanted to do was come on and talk about his favourite royal nonce, I mean, isn't that what the general random conversation thread is for?

  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ant said:

you're not overly ruffling feathers is the problem, you're just being a bit of a knob, moreso if it's over topics or opinions you don't believe yourself and are doing it purely to get a bite, which frankly makes it more sad you have nothing better to contribute , in which case feel free to jog on.

or i can do that for you and not lose any sleep over it

Do whatever you want 

 

1 minute ago, Renton said:

You're doing it to yourself. It's been noticed by more than me, there's barely a message board in the country which will tolerate appeasement of paedophilia in the way you have the last couple of days. Like I said, I think the SMB is more your style. 

Like Gemmill, I've said my piece. I'm out too. 

I haven't said anything that remotely condones paedophilia. I have kids and protecting them is something I would die for.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Asprilla said:

I have posted there. Not as much admittedly.

 

I do like ruffling feathers when people are so easy to wind up.

 

I believe some of what I post :lol:

Is that supposed to be a more or less realistic version of events than the hypothetical Prince Andrew scenario you’ve been painting? :razz:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Alex said:

Is that supposed to be a more or less realistic version of events than the hypothetical Prince Andrew scenario you’ve been painting? :razz:

As I say I believe some of what I post. The rest is just arguing for sport.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Asprilla said:

I have posted there. Not as much admittedly.

 

I do like ruffling feathers when people are so easy to wind up.

 

I believe some of what I post :lol:

You're literally a grown man with children. If this is what passes for entertainment for you then it really doesn't say much for your life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Alex said:

It was a rhetorical question 

No you definitely meant it cause that's the only possible option when dealing with the internet

 

1 minute ago, Howmanheyman said:

Blatantly henpecked, tbh.

Nah, I got one of the good ones :wub: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ewerk said:

You're literally a grown man with children. If this is what passes for entertainment for you then it really doesn't say much for your life.

 

That's a bit rich... at least I took a decade off from posting here. Look at your post counts ffs :lol:

 

It's January and everyone in the world has Covid

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Asprilla said:

Do whatever you want 

 

I haven't said anything that remotely condones paedophilia. I have kids and protecting them is something I would die for.  

If you didn't have kids, would you be less bothered about the old noncery?

 

'I have a daughter and I'd do anything for her, but you have to ask if Sarah Everard was asking for it? What?! I'm just asking questions!'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Fish said:

If you didn't have kids, would you be less bothered about the old noncery?

 

'I have a daughter and I'd do anything for her, but you have to ask if Sarah Everard was asking for it? What?! I'm just asking questions!'

You lot are obsessed...like right wing anti gay preachers. Always the first to the sausage party.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Asprilla said:

You lot are obsessed...like right wing anti gay preachers. Always the first to the sausage party.

By you lot, do you mean people who are entirely unimpressed by contrarians 'just asking questions'?

Cos if you do, then no.

And if you don't, then also no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Kevin Carr's Gloves said:

That sounds a lot like defending him to me.

As far as I was aware the age of consent is 16… but seemingly there are a lot of experts here about what the rules are “for some reason”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, The Fish said:

By you lot, do you mean people who are entirely unimpressed by contrarians 'just asking questions'?

Cos if you do, then no.

And if you don't, then also no.

If/when a court case happens, presumably you’ll assume his lawyers are paedos too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Asprilla said:

If/when a court case happens, presumably you’ll assume his lawyers are paedos too

Hey, I'm just asking questions. No need to get defensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.