Eddie’s Couldn’t Score in a Brothel Mags vs Guehi’s piss taking underachievers

[Holden McGroin 6643]

8 hours ago, Gemmill said:

Starting to wonder about Isak like. He's a brilliant technical player and dead sharp in his head, but he doesn't present a physical challenge at all to PL centre halves, and he breaks down a lot too. 

 

I really like him but I wonder if he wouldn't be better out wide or something. Not that we have a space for him out wide. 

nah. He is a goal machine with the service. We’ve been awful going forward this season. If he played for a top 4 team he’d be smashing them in.

 

his injury record is a worry for me though. Made of glass.

[The Fish 10900]

On 01/12/2024 at 09:44, RobinRobin said:

Is it worth getting 100+k for him and get Ferguson and a RW for the money? 

I'd want more than that for Isak.

[Kid Dynamite 7076]

On 01/12/2024 at 09:44, RobinRobin said:

Is it worth getting 100+k for him and get Ferguson and a RW for the money? 

This issue with selling Isak is he cost us £65mil, so even if we got £100mil for him, it's not enough profit to revamp the whole squad. And you then end up spending £70mil+ to buy Ferguson or similar to replace him, who probably won't get you half as many goals anyway. Same issue with Gordon. 

 

If anyone goes it will be Bruno. He represents the biggest profit margin in the squad and we have Tonali to replace him. 

[Isegrim 9814]

I am no accountant, am not ginger and am not related to Chinese mice, but I am pretty sure amortisation works differently.

[RobinRobin 11357]

15 hours ago, The Fish said:

I'd want more than that for Isak.

[Dazzler 9848]

21 hours ago, Kid Dynamite said:

This issue with selling Isak is he cost us £65mil, so even if we got £100mil for him, it's not enough profit to revamp the whole squad. And you then end up spending £70mil+ to buy Ferguson or similar to replace him, who probably won't get you half as many goals anyway. Same issue with Gordon. 

 

If anyone goes it will be Bruno. He represents the biggest profit margin in the squad and we have Tonali to replace him. 

We spent a similar fee on Gordon as we did with Bruno. I don't think selling any of the three has a material impact from a PSR point of view (maybe £10m of additional profit in the year of sale give or take).

 

The difference between the three is that Gordon and Bruno both extended their contracts which means we may be able to spread their remaining transfer fees a bit more (stand to be corrected on this) which means the impact on PSR from amortisation is reduced, however it would also stretch the net book value of their transfer fee hitting us in profit if we sell them.

 

As I mentioned though, overall I don't think selling one over the other would make a huge difference in our ability to overhaul the squad (or not). Rough guess you'd be looking at £70m profit recognised on Isak if we sold him for £100m and it wouldn't be a kick in the arse off with Gordon or Bruno.

 

Either way that does have a pretty decent impact on our PSR - but probably not enough to go mental.

[Dr Gloom 22015]

1 hour ago, Dazzler said:

We spent a similar fee on Gordon as we did with Bruno. I don't think selling any of the three has a material impact from a PSR point of view (maybe £10m of additional profit in the year of sale give or take).

 

The difference between the three is that Gordon and Bruno both extended their contracts which means we may be able to spread their remaining transfer fees a bit more (stand to be corrected on this) which means the impact on PSR from amortisation is reduced, however it would also stretch the net book value of their transfer fee hitting us in profit if we sell them.

 

As I mentioned though, overall I don't think selling one over the other would make a huge difference in our ability to overhaul the squad (or not). Rough guess you'd be looking at £70m profit recognised on Isak if we sold him for £100m and it wouldn't be a kick in the arse off with Gordon or Bruno.

 

Either way that does have a pretty decent impact on our PSR - but probably not enough to go mental.

It’s a ridiculous state of affairs that we have to engage in this kind of craic on a football message board. Not blaming you. I don’t understand any of it 

[Dazzler 9848]

1 hour ago, Dr Gloom said:

It’s a ridiculous state of affairs that we have to engage in this kind of craic on a football message board. Not blaming you. I don’t understand any of it 

It feels like you’re blaming me and I’ve made a note of it on my spreadsheet highlighting all the times I’ve had my feelings hurt.

[wykikitoon 20328]

What's the situation with Haydn's contract on PSR?

[The Fish 10900]

6 minutes ago, wykikitoon said:

What's the situation with Haydn's contract on PSR?

 

If we were to sell him for anything, it'd be pure profit. But it's unlikely he'd command any fee. We signed him for €2.9m in 16/17, in terms of PSR he's paid for 10 times over.

[David Kelly 1253]

1 hour ago, The Fish said:

 

If we were to sell him for anything, it'd be pure profit. But it's unlikely he'd command any fee. We signed him for €2.9m in 16/17, in terms of PSR he's paid for 10 times over.

In terms of quality on the pitch he still owes a fortune though.