Bournemouth vs Newcastle United

[Isegrim 9761]

Just now, aimaad22 said:

Very lucky to come off with a point and 10 men there. 

 

Another worrying performance. Joelinton with arguably his worst performance for us 

I haven’t seen the game but big Joe with his worst performance sounds like someone was eating too much bacon tbh

[NJS 4377]

Blatant bicep. 

 

Redknapp cunt. 

[Dr Gloom 21912]

It was an obvious handball. Nothing controversial about it at all 

[thebrokendoll 9188]

 

settle for a point there I think.

[Holden McGroin 6581]

Until we sign a new RW I think our best front three are Barnes -Isak-Gordon.

 

 

[Dr Gloom 21912]

On balance we deserved a point. Good opening 20 minutes then Bournemouth started playing like the home side. We were much more threatening with Barnes on for Murphy and Willock for Longstaff. I’d like to see us start like that at home. 

[Dr Gloom 21912]

Bournemouth are a decent side tbf, it’s not a bad result 

[Toonpack 9385]

Gordon is patently not up to fitness an all. Blowing out his arse before he came off.

[OTF 7295]

Just now, Renton said:

 

It wasn't for me, but aye, of course I'd have a different opinion if the boot were on the other foot. In normal build up play, I'm not arsed, but scoring a goal like this, naah. 

 

The VAR and handball rules on goals played out perfectly, exactly what they're designed for.

 

Man watching their goal Joelinton had so many opportunities to pass the ball and didn't, such a Jekyll and Hyde performance after his herculean effot last week.

 

We're somehow on four points after two overall shite performances. We did have some good spells here but look desperately short of cohesion.

[Gemmill 44804]

1 minute ago, Dr Gloom said:

It was an obvious handball. Nothing controversial about it at all 

 

 

I mean, no it absolutely wasn't. 

[Christmas Tree 4725]

Think Eddie definitely picked the wrong team there. We need Tripps forward play as with Hall. Also much rather have Gordon and Barnes on the pitch rather than Murphy or Almiron. Finally Willock or Toonali need to relegate Longstaff to the bench.

[OTF 7295]

Just now, Gemmill said:

 

 

I mean, no it absolutely wasn't. 

On replay it was very clear.

[Toonpack 9385]

Just now, Holden McGroin said:

Until we sign a new RW I think our best front three are Barnes -Isak-Gordon.

 

 

Won’t matter if we don’t get a proper CB.

[acrossthepond 877]

1 minute ago, Toonpack said:

Gordon is patently not up to fitness an all. Blowing out his arse before he came off.

Thoroughly Southgated.

[LongTimeAdmirer 1256]

2 minutes ago, Toonpack said:

Gordon is patently not up to fitness an all. Blowing out his arse before he came off.

Needs to be dropped for Barnes 

[Toonpack 9385]

1 minute ago, LongTimeAdmirer said:

Needs to be dropped for Barnes 

No, no he really doesn’t, he needs the games.

[OTF 7295]

1 minute ago, Christmas Tree said:

Think Eddie definitely picked the wrong team there. We need Tripps forward play as with Hall. Also much rather have Gordon and Barnes on the pitch rather than Murphy or Almiron. Finally Willock or Toonali need to relegate Longstaff to the bench.

 

Trippier does make a big difference to our composure and ability to maintain possession, and I agree that an alternative to Longstaff needs to be implemented asap. Gordon and Barnes are our best wide players.

 

Kelly didn't impress, though wasn't terrible. He's more defensive minded than Hall, I think Eddie got that right (or potentially could have started Trippier at LB?).

[Toonpack 9385]

On the bright side, a point away where we usually play shit, feels ok in Toonpackville.

[thebrokendoll 9188]

2 minutes ago, LongTimeAdmirer said:

Needs to be dropped for Barnes 

 

if you chopped one of gordon's legs off he'd still be a better starter on the right than the 2 options we have.

[Dr Gloom 21912]

6 minutes ago, Gemmill said:

 

 

I mean, no it absolutely wasn't. 

:lol: it literally came off his arm 

[Gemmill 44804]

5 minutes ago, OTF said:

On replay it was very clear.

 

It wasn't man. It hit the sleeved part of his upper arm, which, at stretch, was probably his shoulder. 

[Dr Gloom 21912]

6 minutes ago, Christmas Tree said:

Think Eddie definitely picked the wrong team there. We need Tripps forward play as with Hall. Also much rather have Gordon and Barnes on the pitch rather than Murphy or Almiron. Finally Willock or Toonali need to relegate Longstaff to the bench.

yup. Can understand why he went safety first away from home though. We did look more open defensively after the changes 

[Dr Gloom 21912]

Just now, Gemmill said:

 

It wasn't man. It hit the sleeved part of his upper arm, which, at stretch, was probably his shoulder. 

there’s a reason why it was overturned. It was a clear and obvious error 

[Toonpack 9385]

Just now, thebrokendoll said:

 

if you chopped one of gordon's legs off he'd still be a better starter on the right than the 2 options we have.

With a player other than Longstaff (Mr. stop,think,think again then pass) inside them either Murphy or Miggy would be better too.

[Dr Gloom 21912]

2 minutes ago, OTF said:

 

Trippier does make a big difference to our composure and ability to maintain possession, and I agree that an alternative to Longstaff needs to be implemented asap. Gordon and Barnes are our best wide players.

 

Kelly didn't impress, though wasn't terrible. He's more defensive minded than Hall, I think Eddie got that right (or potentially could have started Trippier at LB?).

I can understand why they might want to cash in on trippier but I agree - he’s still a better technical player than Livramento