Jump to content

Who hopes Palace get relegated and Guehi leaves on a free?


Marc Guehi  

35 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, aimaad22 said:

 

Well yes, but these are rules that favor the biggest clubs and have been specifically tailored to stop us post takeover. Yet City are the ones taking the league on over that? They're affected too of course but we just seem to be whimpering in a corner. I'd like to see a little bit of agitation tbh. 

 

I'm not saying break the rules but we seem to have found absolutely no way to use PIFs muscle to our benefit. At various times some of us have mentioned that we'd expect to see more sponsorships etc by now but that progress also seems to be slow. The stadium feasibility study alone seems to be taking years. These are sensitive issues granted but if you're not willing to shake things up a bit PSR and the Premier league will have us tied down for decades. 

 


I’m inclined to agree with you, as the saying goes: ‘shy bairns get nowt’.

 

I’m frustrated that we’ve done everything by the book. Where’s the training kit sponsor? Where’s the training ground sponsor? Where’s the official tampon supplier to the men’s team? 
 

We’ve taken a lot of flak for being owned by a bunch of murderous oil loving cunts without seeing the full benefit of it. If they’re okay with cutting up journalists with a bone saw then I reckon they wouldn’t be too upset with some PL aggro. It’s up to the people at SJP to push that.

Edited by ewerk
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're not going to commit to sponsorship deals until they see how the dust settles on the City judgement and how far that pushes the envelope, if at all.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Gemmill said:

I hear whining. I don't hear any ideas.


I just made three suggestions. So it looks like you’re neither an ideas man nor a details man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Toonpack said:

They're not going to commit to sponsorship deals until they see how the dust settles on the City judgement and how far that pushes the envelope, if at all.


Why not? What’s the worst that could happen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ewerk said:


I just made three suggestions. So it looks like you’re neither an ideas man nor a details man.

 

Official Tampon supplier? Are you and aimaad hoping for a big delivery? 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ewerk said:


Why not? What’s the worst that could happen?

 

We get locked into a deal we could have bettered if we waited.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Toonpack said:

 

We get locked into a deal we could have bettered if we waited.


We are talking about sweetheart deals with VERY friendly customers. Negotiations on bonuses and get out clauses shouldn’t be a problem.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even a dodgy sale to Saudi might have been nice just to ruffle feathers a bit. Fine Miggy doesnt want to go there the useless tit, but how much did we sell ASM for? 25M? Sheesh. It's like the club has been tucking their tail between the legs and saying 'please oh please dont question us premier league please look how nice we are'. 

 

 

And if a certain Australian is reading 25M is still far too much for him, it's just that Chelsea or ManUtd would have gotten 35-40M.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gemmill said:

 

Official Tampon supplier? Are you and aimaad hoping for a big delivery? 


By the sounds of it they could make their money back on a massive bloody cunt in Wideopen.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Isegrim said:

Exactly. People who bank on us doing serious business in January to strengthen our first team will be incredibly disappointed come February.


We managed it the first season of the takeover when we signed Bruno, trippier, burn and Targett. It isn’t impossible 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, ewerk said:


We are talking about sweetheart deals with VERY friendly customers. Negotiations on bonuses and get out clauses shouldn’t be a problem.

 

it's reached the stage with me now where I'm actually as fucked off with how pathetically desperate the club is to be seen to comply with the pl's corrupt rules than I am with the cunts who set them up in the first place.

appears we can only hope to sign the kid from brentford if we further strengthen arsenal with isak or liverpool with gordon, and so it carries on forever more. fuck em, fight them in court, show some bollocks.

 

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only Forest and Liverpool have conceded less than us so far while only three sides have scored less than us.

 

Can the 14 idiots on here who voted yes please start drafting their apology posts?

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, ewerk said:

Only Forest and Liverpool have conceded less than us so far while only three sides have scored less than us.

 

Can the 14 idiots on here who voted yes please start drafting their apology posts?

I didn't realise that you could view what people voted for so I normally go for a controversial vote regardless of the subject matter. I may change my approach moving forwards. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.