Fop 1 Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 They can't fall for that! It's the oldest trick in the book. "Persuade"? FFS! Get his arm up his back and frog march the fucker. Don't worry I'd expect some new draconian legislation allowing them to march any person with a British passport onto a plane (whilst having a heart attack or not) within months. To protect us from terrorists..... oh sorry paedophiles. Of course forced marriages to under-age children for religious reasons will be exempt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitman 2207 Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 D'you wanna be in my gang? Not fucking likely Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 They can't fall for that! It's the oldest trick in the book. "Persuade"? FFS! Get his arm up his back and frog march the fucker. Don't worry I'd expect some new draconian legislation allowing them to march any person with a British passport onto a plane (whilst having a heart attack or not) within months. To protect us from terrorists..... oh sorry paedophiles. Of course forced marriages to under-age children for religious reasons will be exempt. I'm sure it won't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 They can't fall for that! It's the oldest trick in the book. "Persuade"? FFS! Get his arm up his back and frog march the fucker. Don't worry I'd expect some new draconian legislation allowing them to march any person with a British passport onto a plane (whilst having a heart attack or not) within months. To protect us from terrorists..... oh sorry paedophiles. Of course forced marriages to under-age children for religious reasons will be exempt. How would British Law have applied in this case though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6700 Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 "Persuade"? FFS! Get his arm up his back and frog march the fucker. If he won't go willingly, chuck the twat in the baggage hold. Hopefully the fucker will freeze to death and then he's no-one's problem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweetleftpeg 0 Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 'Get this motherfucking peado, off this motherfucking plane.' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 I'm sure it won't. How would British Law have applied in this case though? See my sig. (Or they could just get the yanks to take them illegally. ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 I'm sure it won't. How would British Law have applied in this case though? See my sig. (Or they could just get the yanks to take them illegally. ) These pisstakes are hard to spot. Could you try making them funny in future? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 I'm sure it won't. How would British Law have applied in this case though? See my sig. (Or they could just get the yanks to take them illegally. ) These pisstakes are hard to spot. Could you try making them funny in future? But I want to fit in. (yes, yes, see my sig) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peasepud 59 Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 Am I missing something? Why the fuck do we want him to come back? I personally would hope he rotted in the Bangkok Hilton for the rest of his days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 Am I missing something? Why the fuck do we want him to come back? I personally would hope he rotted in the Bangkok Hilton for the rest of his days. Seen to be doing. If he weren't getting the media he is getting they probably would be quite happy with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khay 10 Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 Am I missing something? Why the fuck do we want him to come back? I personally would hope he rotted in the Bangkok Hilton for the rest of his days. Cos he is being deported from the country he is in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peasepud 59 Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 Am I missing something? Why the fuck do we want him to come back? I personally would hope he rotted in the Bangkok Hilton for the rest of his days. Cos he is being deported from the country he is in. Yeah but if he tries to book a flight to some other asian country in the meantime I assume the copper with him wont be "persuading him not to"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 Why the fuck do we want him to come back? He's the leader of the gang. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 Am I missing something? Why the fuck do we want him to come back? I personally would hope he rotted in the Bangkok Hilton for the rest of his days. Cos he is being deported from the country he is in. Yeah but if he tries to book a flight to some other asian country in the meantime I assume the copper with him wont be "persuading him not to"? I think the preference is that he's here and being monitored, rather than hopping around Asian country's diddling kids unchecked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 Am I missing something? Why the fuck do we want him to come back? I personally would hope he rotted in the Bangkok Hilton for the rest of his days. Cos he is being deported from the country he is in. Yeah but if he tries to book a flight to some other asian country in the meantime I assume the copper with him wont be "persuading him not to"? I think the preference is that he's here and being monitored, rather than hopping around Asian country's diddling kids unchecked. Which again the UK Government isn't actually too bothered about, unless they generate press like he does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peasepud 59 Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 Am I missing something? Why the fuck do we want him to come back? I personally would hope he rotted in the Bangkok Hilton for the rest of his days. Cos he is being deported from the country he is in. Yeah but if he tries to book a flight to some other asian country in the meantime I assume the copper with him wont be "persuading him not to"? I think the preference is that he's here and being monitored, rather than hopping around Asian country's diddling kids unchecked. If some other country is daft enough to take him in then let him be their concern not ours, otherwise hes just going to try doing the same things here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 Am I missing something? Why the fuck do we want him to come back? I personally would hope he rotted in the Bangkok Hilton for the rest of his days. Cos he is being deported from the country he is in. Yeah but if he tries to book a flight to some other asian country in the meantime I assume the copper with him wont be "persuading him not to"? I think the preference is that he's here and being monitored, rather than hopping around Asian country's diddling kids unchecked. If some other country is daft enough to take him in then let him be their concern not ours, otherwise hes just going to try doing the same things here. I can't see how that would be fair when we deport criminals and immigrants by the bucketload. He's a British citizen. Also I think you highlight part of the problem, No other country is daft enough to take him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 I can't see how that would be fair when we deport criminals and immigrants by the bucketload. Figures? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 I can't see how that would be fair when we deport criminals and immigrants by the bucketload. Figures? We only do that if their human rights aren't infringed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 I can't see how that would be fair when we deport criminals and immigrants by the bucketload. Figures? We only do that if their human rights aren't infringed. Or potentially infringed, so I'd be interested in the "bucketload" figures..... actually would removing someone passport and rights of travel "infringe" their human rights? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 I can't see how that would be fair when we deport criminals and immigrants by the bucketload. Figures? We only do that if their human rights aren't infringed. Or potentially infringed, so I'd be interested in the "bucketload" figures..... actually would removing someone passport and rights of travel "infringe" their human rights? Well, obviously I meant that too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peasepud 59 Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 Am I missing something? Why the fuck do we want him to come back? I personally would hope he rotted in the Bangkok Hilton for the rest of his days. Cos he is being deported from the country he is in. Yeah but if he tries to book a flight to some other asian country in the meantime I assume the copper with him wont be "persuading him not to"? I think the preference is that he's here and being monitored, rather than hopping around Asian country's diddling kids unchecked. If some other country is daft enough to take him in then let him be their concern not ours, otherwise hes just going to try doing the same things here. I can't see how that would be fair when we deport criminals and immigrants by the bucketload. He's a British citizen. Also I think you highlight part of the problem, No other country is daft enough to take him. Then we take him back, hes our responsibility as a british citizen I agree that, just think that we shouldnt do anything to "infringe his right" to fuck off to some other country instead (if they'll take him). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fop 1 Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 I can't see how that would be fair when we deport criminals and immigrants by the bucketload. Figures? We only do that if their human rights aren't infringed. Or potentially infringed, so I'd be interested in the "bucketload" figures..... actually would removing someone passport and rights of travel "infringe" their human rights? Well, obviously I meant that too. It is a BIG difference though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest alex Posted August 20, 2008 Share Posted August 20, 2008 My first post was a throwaway comment. I was actually agreeing with you though. Trust you to try and make something out of it What a fucking tit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now