Jump to content

Other Games 23/24


Ayatollah Hermione
 Share

Recommended Posts

Maybe Bayern should have signed Joselu instead of Kane to keep winning trophies.

 

Neuer lost them the game but Kane should have made it 2-0 earlier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kid Dynamite said:


Ref/linesman fucked that up. Was a very tight offside call

 

Sure looks like it.

 

Hope Dortmund can win it. But knowing their luck and Real's, they wont. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, aimaad22 said:

 

Sure looks like it.

 

Hope Dortmund can win it. But knowing their luck and Real's, they wont. 

Can’t see Real being as stupid as PSG.

 

They needed Neuer to make a mistake but he already made a couple of very good saves earlier to keep Bayern in the game. Real were clearly the better team today and deserved to go through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Isegrim said:

Can’t see Real being as stupid as PSG.

 

They needed Neuer to make a mistake but he already made a couple of very good saves earlier to keep Bayern in the game. Real were clearly the better team today and deserved to go through.


PSG were the better team against us, but they didn't deserve a dodgy penalty any more than Real deserved a dodgy offside call

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, aimaad22 said:

 

Sure looks like it.

 

Hope Dortmund can win it. But knowing their luck and Real's, they wont. 

Fingers crossed. I distinctly remember the game the last time Dortmund won it. Juve had a team of superstars and Dortmund were given little chance then  too. In the end they thoroughly deserved their win. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Kid Dynamite said:


PSG were the better team against us, but they didn't deserve a dodgy penalty any more than Real deserved a dodgy offside call

The ref had blown the whistle as soon as the flag went up, if there was no flag it doesn’t mean the German Man Utd would have scored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was offside, wasn't he? Ludicrous that the linesman put his flag up but it's a load of controversy over nothing if the bloke was offside. 

 

I switched it off as soon as it finished, so if he was proven to actually be onside, I've missed it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Tom said:


 

 

 

 

absolutely tremendous work by those lads that was, sets the standards that all football youtubers etc should be striving for.

adam pearson..... eat your heart out.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Gemmill said:

He was offside, wasn't he? Ludicrous that the linesman put his flag up but it's a load of controversy over nothing if the bloke was offside. 

 

I switched it off as soon as it finished, so if he was proven to actually be onside, I've missed it. 


The Bayern player who touched the ball (Muller?) looked level. The offside player wasn't interfering with play so the game should have been played on and checked by VAR

 

 

 

Edited by Kid Dynamite
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ball is also half way off the players foot in that frame. If they knock it back a frame I think he's definitely onside. The technology they use for offsides is ridiculously analogue. Pixelated pictures, hand drawn lines, picking and choosing which frame to go off.
 

Automate it and let the computer decide 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the frame thing will persist even with computers. There was an incident recently where they put the VAR audio up and the bloke on VAR was saying right, frame 1 or 2, and there was a canny difference between them both. But the camera only takes so many frames per seconds. 

 

You could ask the computer to take the two frames and attempt to interpolate the exact point at which foot hit ball, but then what do you do with the attacker/defender? You can't really do the same with both of them cos there isn't an object (foot) moving towards another object (ball). You've got different limbs moving in different directions and stuff. You need to take the frozen picture linked to the frame selected. 

 

Anyway, a very long winded way of saying that the camera frame thing is unavoidable, in which I got to impress you all by using the word interpolate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Gemmill said:

I think the frame thing will persist even with computers. There was an incident recently where they put the VAR audio up and the bloke on VAR was saying right, frame 1 or 2, and there was a canny difference between them both. But the camera only takes so many frames per seconds. 

 

You could ask the computer to take the two frames and attempt to interpolate the exact point at which foot hit ball, but then what do you do with the attacker/defender? You can't really do the same with both of them cos there isn't an object (foot) moving towards another object (ball). You've got different limbs moving in different directions and stuff. You need to take the frozen picture linked to the frame selected. 

 

Anyway, a very long winded way of saying that the camera frame thing is unavoidable, in which I got to impress you all by using the word interpolate. 

Software should be able to compute the speed of the player, the speed of the leg making the pass and be able to plot where the body would be between frames.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Kevin Carr's Gloves said:

Software should be able to compute the speed of the player, the speed of the leg making the pass and be able to plot where the body would be between frames.

 

I said that in my post about foot to ball. It can't predict player movement though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No it doesn't. There are multiple points on the body that can be offside. It has to interpolate a position for ALL of them across multiple players, and then determine which is furthest forward at the point of contact. 

 

Which is why it's not fucking happening. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, ewerk said:

Give the advantage to the attacker. It’s that simple.

 

Offside only when the player's full body is in front of the defender? Like the ball crossing over the line rule? Should be easier to automate too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, ewerk said:

Give the advantage to the attacker. It’s that simple.

 

This ☝️

 

They have umpires call in cricket to account for the fact the technology isn't 100%, if it's so close you need to draw lines should be onside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Tdansmith said:

that's Villa out I reckon


Damaging the coefficient so that Spurs cant make the CL 🫡

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Tom said:


Damaging the coefficient so that Spurs cant make the CL 🫡

That’s already impossible isn’t it? Places are going to Germany and Italy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Meenzer changed the title to Other Games 23/24

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.