Jump to content

howe's team with a couple of players who should never play for us again v rodger's team with a couple of players we should nick


thebrokendoll
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Rosco said:

For anybody not old enough......Ruud Gulliit wanted sexy football when appointed as manager and somehow that photo appeared in The Sun


It was a newspaper advert for the broadcast of an European tie on channel 5 whilst Gullit was manager , the spiel was something like

 

SEXY FOOTBALL, CHANNEL 5 TONIGHT AT 7 :45pm 

 

Then the mocked up picture of Batty below . Google doesn’t appear to have the original advert in full but that might just be me being useless (I’ll get HMHM or the broken doll to have a go, they’re internet genii :D ) The game was almost certainly v Partizan Belgrade in the old cup winners cup which I think was the only European game Gullit was in charge for. Happy to be corrected on that..

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PaddockLad said:

There’s a 2 in 3 chance we’re going to get one of the ugly sisters from mancyland in the semis, I think all talk of the final should be banned :cuppa:

 

This is true but I actually fancy us against Manure. City are the real problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Rayvin said:

 

This is true but I actually fancy us against Manure. City are the real problem.


Man City are brilliant but  I feel we’ll have a chance,  they’ll always leave space for us because they’ll come and attack us 🤷🏻‍♂️ and we know we can exploit that nowadays 

 

Man Utd are much improved under Ten Hag. Mind if you look player for player there’s not many that I’d take over who we’ve got…. maybe Rashford, maybe the Varane we saw in Qatar? 🤔

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Rayvin said:

 

This is true but I actually fancy us against Manure. City are the real problem.

 

Man Utd are not to be underestimated. They've much improved as the season has progressed - either of those sides would give us a real challenge.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, ewerk said:

 

What age are you again? ;) 

 

Honestly it's not even a maturity thing, I just cannot be fucked typing out Man Utd with that fucking space between the words when my phone can just predictive "manure" into it and it's done. :lol: 

  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Craig said:

 

Man Utd are not to be underestimated. They've much improved as the season has progressed - either of those sides would give us a real challenge.

 

True, and I agree with this, but it's not like the games against them that we're used to anymore. Typically we'd get them in the situation like this and we'd be clear underdogs with a mountain to climb. I don't think that mountain is quite so high now. I'm not even sure it is a mountain anymore, perhaps just a mound. Their team isn't better than ours, although we might be roughly comparable in the cold light of day - the only thing they've really got over us IMO is that they're used to winning when it counts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Rayvin said:

 

Honestly it's not even a maturity thing, I just cannot be fucked typing out Man Utd with that fucking space between the words when my phone can just predictive "manure" into it and it's done. :lol: 

 

wow, no apology? you've changed 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Dr Gloom said:


maybe fish or Gemmill can explain?

 

actually, please don’t 

loads of chances, not a lot of big ones in the first half. e.g. Longstaff's chance in the first minute was only something like 0.3xG. 

Image

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Rayvin said:

 

True, and I agree with this, but it's not like the games against them that we're used to anymore. Typically we'd get them in the situation like this and we'd be clear underdogs with a mountain to climb. I don't think that mountain is quite so high now. I'm not even sure it is a mountain anymore, perhaps just a mound. Their team isn't better than ours, although we might be roughly comparable in the cold light of day - the only thing they've really got over us IMO is that they're used to winning when it counts.

 

Since their diabolical first 2 games of the season they've:

 

Won 11, draw 2, lost 2, scored 25, conceded 14.

 

Over the same period we've:

Won 8, draw 7, lost 1, scored 30, conceded 13.

 

One of my mates is a Man United fan and I've watched a few of their games recently with him. They pass well, press hard and can finish. They're definitely a match for us IMO.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Craig said:

 

Since their diabolical first 2 games of the season they've:

 

Won 11, draw 2, lost 2, scored 25, conceded 14.

 

Over the same period we've:

Won 8, draw 7, lost 1, scored 30, conceded 13.

 

One of my mates is a Man United fan and I've watched a few of their games recently with him. They pass well, press hard and can finish. They're definitely a match for us IMO.

 

Still don't disagree, but of every time we've faced them since idk, 1996, I'm not sure we've ever been as strong relative to them as we are now. That's all I'm saying, it's not the match up that it once was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wykikitoon said:

Getting rid of the rapist is their best decision yet too.

Ironically he did them a massive favour. The manager was in an awkward spot due to his status as a legend but that interview gave the manager all the leverage he needed to get rid 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, The Fish said:

loads of chances, not a lot of big ones in the first half. e.g. Longstaff's chance in the first minute was only something like 0.3xG. 

Image


shite

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, The Fish said:

loads of chances, not a lot of big ones in the first half. e.g. Longstaff's chance in the first minute was only something like 0.3xG. 

Image

I was wondering about the xG being so low, but thinking back if we had converted any of those first half chances would have been absolute screamers

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, The Fish said:

loads of chances, not a lot of big ones in the first half. e.g. Longstaff's chance in the first minute was only something like 0.3xG. 

Image


Only 3 in 10 players finish the chance Longy missed in the first couple of minutes??? 

491DCFC0-E946-47C7-96B2-0CC19F240808.gif

  • Haha 4
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.