Extra Time on Extra Time Hating Bastards v Exhibition Building Loving, Shandy Drinking Fannies

[OTF 7295]

2 minutes ago, Craig said:

 

Which under the guidelines of VAR he is obliged to do!

 

Only if there is a clear and obvious error, which there wasn't, ergo VAR was obliged to do nothing.

[sammynb 3355]

1 minute ago, Craig said:

 

Which under the guidelines of VAR he is obliged to do!

 

Um, you sure about that. Isn't it the VAR referee's job to deem whether the incident needs review and that's why they check stuff and dismiss it without the on field referee ever having to go review.

Sorry mate, you are wrong in this instance.

[wykikitoon 20125]

But when it's sent to VAR isn't the ultimate decision with them?  Either allow it or give the onfield ref another look? He didn't go with the latter so Mason is the one to blame?

[Isegrim 9762]

1 minute ago, wykikitoon said:

We'll lose this

Yes, I am really fed up with this VAR nonsense in the EPL. It nowhere near as bad handled in Europe as in the UK tbh

[wykikitoon 20125]

1 minute ago, sammynb said:

 

Um, you sure about that. Isn't it the VAR referee's job to deem whether the incident needs review and that's why they check stuff and dismiss it without the on field referee ever having to go review.

Sorry mate, you are wrong in this instance.

[ewerk 30570]

‘A lot of excitement here about young Henderson’, as Anderson gets ready to come on. This co-commentator has really done his research.

[sammynb 3355]

FFS Murphy on to score the winner.

[wykikitoon 20125]

FFS Murphy on

[Howay 12496]

I’m sorry for complaining about Almiron, I never wanted Murphy on  

[OTF 7295]

4 minutes ago, wykikitoon said:

So we get a few more minutes added on yeh?

 

Only if you're amongst the 'big 6' and have had your manager wildly gesticulating down the sidelines.

[wykikitoon 20125]

Isak has great control and a lovely pass on him

[Craig 6682]

3 minutes ago, Ayatollah Hermione said:

What’s he obliged to do like? Look for fouls where there are none? Have a fundamental lack of understanding about the sport he’s overseeing? 

 

A goal was scored when the goalkeeper was taken out (who by is immaterial). It's a slam dunk VAR review. The final decision of which rests with the on-field ref. I'm not denying we've been fucked over, but it's the guy on the pitch we need to be venting our fury towards, Mason has done want he is obliged to do as a VAR official.

[Howay 12496]

Longstaff must take heavy sleeping pills before stepping onto the pitch, never seen a bloke be caught so flat footed every time the ball goes his way. 

[sammynb 3355]

1 minute ago, OTF said:

 

Only if you're amongst the 'big 6' and have had your manager wildly gesticulating down the sidelines.

 

Get Eddie a set of joke teeth, that will help.

[OTF 7295]

Pope 🥰

[Howay 12496]

Pope is an amazing keeper

[aimaad22 4156]

Pope saving our arse there. Great save. 

 

And we aren't creating much at the other end. 

[wykikitoon 20125]

1 minute ago, Craig said:

 

A goal was scored when the goalkeeper was taken out (who by is immaterial). It's a slam dunk VAR review. The final decision of which rests with the on-field ref. I'm not denying we've been fucked over, but it's the guy on the pitch we need to be venting our fury towards, Mason has done want he is obliged to do as a VAR official.

So its the onfield ref that denied that goal?

[Craig 6682]

4 minutes ago, sammynb said:

 

Um, you sure about that. Isn't it the VAR referee's job to deem whether the incident needs review and that's why they check stuff and dismiss it without the on field referee ever having to go review.

Sorry mate, you are wrong in this instance.

 

Actually Sammy, it's you who is completely wrong and clearly don't understand how VAR operates. Goals scored with any element of doubt over its validity is, under current guidelines,  always passed to the on-field referee for final review. Same happened at Wolves where their goal was chalked off. 

 

[ewerk 30570]

1 minute ago, Craig said:

 

A goal was scored when the goalkeeper was taken out (who by is immaterial). It's a slam dunk VAR review. The final decision of which rests with the on-field ref. I'm not denying we've been fucked over, but it's the guy on the pitch we need to be venting our fury towards, Mason has done want he is obliged to do as a VAR official.

He’s not obliged to send it down to the on field ref, that’s what we’re saying. The FA should have banned you for life.  

[Ayatollah Hermione 13862]

1 minute ago, Craig said:

 

A goal was scored when the goalkeeper was taken out (who by is immaterial). It's a slam dunk VAR review. The final decision of which rests with the on-field ref. I'm not denying we've been fucked over, but it's the guy on the pitch we need to be venting our fury towards, Mason has done want he is obliged to do as a VAR official.

No, he doesn’t have to send him to the monitor at all, man  if he looks at that replay, he sees the collision is caused by a Palace player pushing a Newcastle player in the back

[Craig 6682]

6 minutes ago, OTF said:

 

Only if there is a clear and obvious error, which there wasn't, ergo VAR was obliged to do nothing.

 

[wykikitoon 20125]

So does the on-field ref tell Mason he thinks its a no goal and he checks, if he doesn't agree he tells him to review? 

[Isegrim 9762]

 

[Craig 6682]

1 minute ago, ewerk said:

He’s not obliged to send it down to the on field ref, that’s what we’re saying. The FA should have banned you for life.  

 

Just now, Ayatollah Hermione said:

No, he doesn’t have to send him to the monitor at all, man  if he looks at that replay, he sees the collision is caused by a Palace player pushing a Newcastle player in the back

 

Clear that many of you don't understand how VAR works. Goal scored whilst GK is taken out = automatic review. Good day to you all