Other Games 22/23

[MrBass 2722]

14 minutes ago, Dr Gloom said:

@Christmas Tree  champions league is nailed on because Howe won’t let standards slip. The sort of collapse required to fall out of top four isn’t plausible based on our form for over a year now. 
 

we can even afford to average just a point a game for the rest of the season. When was the last time we went on a run that bad?

 

there’s a reason we’re odds on with the bookies. They’re not in the habit of losing money. We’re not talking about your crypto bets here…

 

Tell that to Bet 365 after I rinsed them for £52 last Sunday 

 

[Gemmill 46064]

 

Liverpool now with a DOUBLE FIGURES chance of making top 4 after last night's result.

 

Toontastic:

 

 

[wykikitoon 20757]

1 minute ago, Gemmill said:

 

Liverpool now with a DOUBLE FIGURES chance of making top 4 after last night's result.

 

Toontastic:

 

 

 

Wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo sweet child of mine.

CT is bricking it.

[MrBass 2722]

It'll all be moot come 18:30 Sunday when we rip Arsenal a #NEWARS 

Edited May 4, 2023 by MrBass

[Dr Gloom 22176]

liverpool's run in is pretty kind, no doubt about it. we just need to continue as we have for the past 18 months and we'll be fine 

 

 

[Dr Gloom 22176]

1 minute ago, MrBass said:

It'll all be moot come 18:30 Sunday when we rip Arsenal a #NEWARS 

 

SEASON DEFINING 

[MrBass 2722]

The predictor site I follow has Man Utd losing 2-0 tonight 

 

That would make things a little more interesting should it happen.

[Christmas Tree 4839]

35 minutes ago, Dr Gloom said:

@Christmas Tree  champions league is nailed on because Howe won’t let standards slip. The sort of collapse required to fall out of top four isn’t plausible based on our form for over a year now. 
 

we can even afford to average just a point a game for the rest of the season. When was the last time we went on a run that bad?

 

there’s a reason we’re odds on with the bookies. They’re not in the habit of losing money. We’re not talking about your crypto bets here…

 

 

 

[MrBass 2722]

[Gemmill 46064]

5 minutes ago, MrBass said:

The predictor site I follow has Man Utd losing 2-0 tonight 

 

That would make things a little more interesting should it happen.

 

Brighton win is definitely the result we all want to see tonight. Get those red manc arseholes nipping.

 

Brighton have got Man City, Arsenal and us to come so there's fuck all chance of them making top 4.

[wykikitoon 20757]

24 minutes ago, Dr Gloom said:

liverpool's run in is pretty kind, no doubt about it. we just need to continue as we have for the past 18 months and we'll be fine 

 

 

Add Gloom to that G-Dogg

 

[The Fish 10972]

57 minutes ago, MrBass said:

It'll all be moot come 18:30 Sunday when we rip Arsenal a #NEWARS 

[LongTimeAdmirer 1286]

55 minutes ago, Gemmill said:

 

 

 

Brighton have got Man City, Arsenal and us to come so there's fuck all chance of them making top 4.

 

 

thats it then, Brighton are definitely coming 4th.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

we'll finish third of course.

[Alex 35595]

Was just thinking but, despite their poor season (by their standards) and their recent form. Liverpool are a bit fortunate to be where they are. We’ve thoroughly earned our position and have been on the end of some shocking decisions too. 

Edited May 4, 2023 by Alex

[Dr Gloom 22176]

57 minutes ago, Alex said:

Was just thinking but, despite their poor season (by their standards) and their recent form. Liverpool are a bit fortunate to be where they are. We’ve thoroughly earned our position and have been in the end of dove shucking decisions too. 

they stole at least three points off us for starters 

[RobinRobin 11586]

2 hours ago, LongTimeAdmirer said:

 

thats it then, Brighton are definitely coming 4th.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

we'll finish third of course.

I can live with that 👍

In fact 

Edited May 4, 2023 by RobinRobin

[The Fish 10972]

4 minutes ago, Alex said:

Was just thinking but, despite their poor season (by their standards) and their recent form. Liverpool are a bit fortunate to be where they are. We’ve thoroughly earned our position and have been in the end of dove shucking decisions too. 

Same as Spurs, if you ask me. They've been playing such bad football for so much of the season and I know this is a silly point, but without Harry Kane, I'm not sure they'd be top half. 

 

 

I've taken the top 20 players for goals scored per 90 minutes (who've played more than 10x90). Harry Kane gets 3.4 shots away per 90, he gets 40.9% of his shots on target, and gets a goal every 45% of the time. He accounts for 40.98% of Spurs' goals, and 32.34% of their non penalty xG.

 

Of those top 20, that's 6th for Shot per 90,  11th for Shots on Target, 8th G/SoT. 2nd for % of Team goals, 1st for % of Team npxG.

[LongTimeAdmirer 1286]

Me: Summarise this excel essay

 

ChatGPT: It's generally true that every team would likely perform worse without their top scorer, as they contribute significantly to the team's scoring ability.

 

 

 

[Alex 35595]

Yeah but it’s an indication of a huge over reliance on one player in this instance 

[The Fish 10972]

2 minutes ago, LongTimeAdmirer said:

Me: Summarise this excel essay

 

ChatGPT: It's generally true that every team would likely perform worse without their top scorer, as they contribute significantly to the team's scoring ability.

 

No team in the league relies more on one player for their goal return. 

He's scored 10 match winners, Spurs have won 16 times. That's 62.5% of their wins have been because of his goals. Man City have relied on Haaland's goals for 40% of their wins. 

[spongebob toonpants 4134]

4 minutes ago, The Fish said:

Man City have relied on Haaland's goals for 40% of their wins. 

Decent article about this in the Guardian today

 

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2023/may/03/record-breaking-erling-haaland-is-the-perfection-of-manchester-city-vision

 

Tldr ManC designed that way. Spurs  nobody else decent

[Howmanheyman 33876]

4 minutes ago, spongebob toonpants said:

Decent article about this in the Guardian today

 

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2023/may/03/record-breaking-erling-haaland-is-the-perfection-of-manchester-city-vision

 

Tldr ManC designed that way. Spurs  nobody else decent

 

He lost me at how many of Shearer's goals were memorable?

[The Fish 10972]

4 minutes ago, spongebob toonpants said:

Decent article about this in the Guardian today

 

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2023/may/03/record-breaking-erling-haaland-is-the-perfection-of-manchester-city-vision

 

Tldr ManC designed that way. Spurs  nobody else decent

If Haaland wasn't there and they had some random jabronie, I still think Man City would be top half because they could rely on goals from their ridiculously good midfield to get them the wins. Spurs couldn't.

[LondonBlue 815]

4 hours ago, The Fish said:

If Haaland wasn't there and they had some random jabronie, I still think Man City would be top half because they could rely on goals from their ridiculously good midfield to get them the wins. Spurs couldn't.

 

we did okay without a striker last year so you might have a point. Also Alvarez is ridiculous value at just £15m.

anyway just popped on to ask if you guys could kindly smash the arse at the weekend. make our job a little easier?

 

[Rayvin 5301]

9 minutes ago, LondonBlue said:

 

we did okay without a striker last year so you might have a point. Also Alvarez is ridiculous value at just £15m.

anyway just popped on to ask if you guys could kindly smash the arse at the weekend. make our job a little easier?

 

 

Well we weren't going to, but since you asked so nicely we'll see what we can do mate