Other Games 22/23

[Gemmill 44894]

Mint.

 

Let's have another. Listen how quiet it is. 

[Ayatollah Hermione 13872]

1 minute ago, PaddockLad said:

They should be shithousing their way to a point the stupid fuckin twats  

Wouldn’t dare catch us losing while playing badly. Amateurish stuff tbh

[Howmanheyman 33239]

And again....

 

 

 

[Ayatollah Hermione 13872]

I reckon if Arsenal lose the away game to Man City, we’re probably not far off him posting far-flung conspiracy theories on the Arsenal subreddit

[Alex 35089]

Here’s the poor man’s Murphy coming on

[PaddockLad 17279]

Just now, Alex said:

Here’s the poor man’s Murphy coming on

Not good enough to lace Longy’s boots

[Gemmill 44894]

Nketiah again. Hat trick of good chances. 

[Tom 14011]

1 hour ago, Ayatollah Hermione said:

I have absolutely no idea what the rules of football are meant to be from game to game  

Same  

 

I could probably tell you who seems to benefit more regularly from the VAR mental gymnastics like 

[wykikitoon 20154]

Love this 🤣

[wykikitoon 20154]

KDB had bottles thrown at him as he was subbed

[Howmanheyman 33239]

I tell something for nothing, they've DEFINITELY moved the microphones away from the away section, not the first time I've noticed it this season for their home games. How small time is that?

[wykikitoon 20154]

Just now, Howmanheyman said:

I tell something for nothing, they've DEFINITELY moved the microphones away from the away section, not the first time I've noticed it this season for their home games. How small time is that?

Classless cunts. 

[Gemmill 44894]

Arsenal have been top since game 3, I think. They'll not be able to cope with this. They've got Man City away to cope with and then they've got to bring their sorry arses back up to SJP for another shithousing clinic. 

 

It's OVER. 

[Isegrim 9778]

Chelsea wasting not only a lot of money but also a huge amount of good chances and losing against Dortmund.  

[Dr Gloom 21924]

1 hour ago, Isegrim said:

Chelsea wasting not only a lot of money but also a huge amount of good chances and losing against Dortmund.  

[Dougle 3333]

[Toonpack 9428]

That penalty/offside, he was offside, but never touched the ball, and fouled for a pen. But because he was offside, he wasn't fouled, player wasn't carded and it was a free kick to Arsenal.

 

Ergo - foul an offside player with impunity and get a free kick in your favour, sounds legit 🤷🏼‍♂️

[Ayatollah Hermione 13872]

8 hours ago, Isegrim said:

Chelsea wasting not only a lot of money but also a huge amount of good chances and losing against Dortmund.  

Potterball in full effect 

[ewerk 30616]

12 minutes ago, Toonpack said:

That penalty/offside, he was offside, but never touched the ball, and fouled for a pen. But because he was offside, he wasn't fouled, player wasn't carded and it was a free kick to Arsenal.

 

Ergo - foul an offside player with impunity and get a free kick in your favour, sounds legit 🤷🏼‍♂️

The offside was the first offence so that’s why Arsenal got the FK.

[Toonpack 9428]

9 minutes ago, ewerk said:

The offside was the first offence so that’s why Arsenal got the FK.

 

So foul an offside player (offside being the first offence) free kick to you ?

 

So someone from City should have levelled Rashford when he ran 20 yards next to the ball, miles offside, before Fernandes scored.

Edited February 16, 2023 by Toonpack

[Alex 35089]

1 minute ago, Toonpack said:

 

So foul an offside player (offside being the first offence) free kick to you ?

It wouldn’t have gone to VAR if it wasn’t a possible pen? In any case the Arsenal player should’ve probably been booked for his reaction to the initial decision. 

[Toonpack 9428]

Aye, I know but it sets a precedent, a player who is offside (who has not touched the ball) can be fouled and it's free kick to you.

 

Player through, you know he's offside, just bring him down. (See Rashford v City, that was a travesty)

 

That said offside is a farce these days where you can be offside by a fingernail, bring back the daylight rule IMO. Games about attacking intent, should be weighted towards the attacker.

 

I also hate that a player comes back from an offside position, but receives the ball in an onside position is given as off, totally unnecessary break in play. Should be about where you receive the ball.

 

 

Edited February 16, 2023 by Toonpack

[LondonBlue 773]

2 hours ago, Toonpack said:

 

So foul an offside player (offside being the first offence) free kick to you ?

 

So someone from City should have levelled Rashford when he ran 20 yards next to the ball, miles offside, before Fernandes scored.

Nice idea, but you forgot the red top rule allowing for a subjective decision should it benefit a team playing in red

[The Fish 10857]

16 hours ago, Gemmill said:

Arsenal have been top since game 3, I think. They'll not be able to cope with this. They've got Man City away to cope with and then they've got to bring their sorry arses back up to SJP for another shithousing clinic. 

 

It's OVER. 

 

This is the GEET BIG AS OWT 7 before last nights game

 

[Toonpack 9428]

42 minutes ago, The Fish said:

 

This is the GEET BIG AS OWT 7 before last nights game