Jump to content

Other Games 22/23


Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Gemmill said:

I like the idea of on field challenges but mostly cos it'll give an opportunity to see some proper arrogant cunts send things upstairs that they're never gonna get. 

 

Rugby league uses them pretty well in Australia. The captain of each team gets to make one challenge per match to an on-field decision. They have to challange immediately after the play. If their challenge is upheld they retain the ability to make a challenge later in the game, if the original decision stands they lose their challenge and can make no more. If the video footage is not conclusive enough the original call remains and the captain retains their challenge.

 

It still doesn't mean that the VAR (called 'the bunker' in league) gets everything right, but for the most part they do. It's also never a case of the VAR referring the decision back to the on-field ref by getting them to watch certain footage. The decision is made by the bunker and relayed to the onfield ref as well as on the big-screen.

Edited by OTF
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, strawb said:

Always thought the people who get into reffing are wrong’uns tbh. 
 

As a kid you want to play, not be Keith Lard enforcing the rules, fucking virgins

 

100%! Along with a lack of any discernible ability and a masochistic desire to be the centre of attention for any reason at all. I like to imagine that today's referee (and all of his ilk) are the product of parent's who never loved them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, OTF said:

 

Rugby league uses them pretty well in Australia. The captain of each team gets to make one challenge per match to an on-field decision. They have to challange immediately after the play. If their challenge is upheld they retain the ability to make a challenge later in the game, if the original decision stands they lose their challenge and can make no more. If the video footage is not conclusive enough the original call remains and the captain retains their challenge.

 

It still doesn't mean that the VAR (called 'the bunker' in league) gets everything right, but for the most part they do. It's also never a case of the VAR referring the decision back to the on-field ref by getting them to watch certain footage. The decision is made by the bunker and relayed to the onfield ref as well as on the big-screen.

One thing I like about the NRL is you hear the ref and video ref talking through the review. It's totally transparent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wykikitoon said:

One thing I like about the NRL is you hear the ref and video ref talking through the review. It's totally transparent. 

 

Agree 100% Even when they get it wrong you at least can understand why they ruled a particular way. There should be nothing to hide.

Edited by OTF
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somebody give Eddie & Dan a call and tell them to chuck out all their transfer criteria. If the pinball wizard doesn’t approve of their fashion sense, they’re not good enough for us. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We’ve seen Howe get a tune out of lots of different players but, even so, it feels like Man Utd did us a massive favour by trying to screw us over with Lingard 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Alex said:

We’ve seen Howe get a tune out of lots of different players but, even so, it feels like Man Utd did us a massive favour by trying to screw us over with Lingard 


Howe strikes me as the type of manager who considers the psychological impact of a player over his technical attributes. i.e. it doesn’t matter how gifted an individual the player may be, if his inclusion would be to the detriment of the group, he’ll not consider him.

 

it wouldn’t at all surprise me if it’s us that walked away from the notion of signing Lingard and had fuck all to do with money. The press, as they’ve demonstrated all too regularly this summer are guessing.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Craig said:


Howe strikes me as the type of manager who considers the psychological impact of a player over his technical attributes. i.e. it doesn’t matter how gifted an individual the player may be, if his inclusion would be to the detriment of the group, he’ll not consider him.

 

it wouldn’t at all surprise me if it’s us that walked away from the notion of signing Lingard and had fuck all to do with money. The press, as they’ve demonstrated all too regularly this summer are guessing.

That's the only reason I think of why we didn't sign Neymar and Mbappe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not quite followed this but what has gone wrong for Leicester exactly? Can't just be Fofana since they only lost him a week ago and they've been dire all season.

 

We might have another chance for Maddison in January if they keep on like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.