PaddockLad 18931 Posted Saturday at 12:26 Share Posted Saturday at 12:26 36 minutes ago, Howmanheyman said: Had a slight, I don't know how to say it, spat(?) with a YouTube NUFC fan who's old enough to know better, basically I noticed a video of someone where it looks like the point of his video is to somehow take credit for the club somehow acknowledging that the club wasn't formed in 1892. I commented on it saying it was common knowledge that the club wasn't founded then and used to be known as 1882 but was probably 1881. I also stated that it was just my hunch but the first I and others heard about the 1892 foundation was very coincidentally in 1992 when a skint NUFC were making a thing of it, maybe trying to punt centenary guff and using it as an excuse for our pre-season tournament featuring SBRs Sporting and Boro. Apparently what I said wasn't quite accurate? Anyway I replied that I've never taken the 1892 date seriously, NUFC memorabilia had 1882 on it and I even found an old NUFC programme with 'founded in 1882" on the club's details despite him saying the club hadn't acknowledged any date which I said was basically bollocks. The most amusing thing about this pointless correspondence was other people blowing smoke up his arse, thanking him for getting the truth out there and saying they had no idea about it, (you don't say!!) and generally praising his detective work. Fucking hell, I felt I was in some parallel NUFC mongaverse. Which engagement farming cunt was this then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 49628 Posted Saturday at 12:29 Share Posted Saturday at 12:29 Michael Martin? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 36390 Posted Saturday at 12:30 Share Posted Saturday at 12:30 Keith. Don't think he's a bad egg tbh but I don't watch his videos as he's not usually telling me anything I don't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 36390 Posted Saturday at 12:31 Share Posted Saturday at 12:31 Just now, Howmanheyman said: Keith. Don't think he's a bad egg tbh but I don't watch his videos as he's not usually telling me anything I don't know. Eddie, not Keith! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OTF 8372 Posted Saturday at 21:29 Share Posted Saturday at 21:29 9 hours ago, Howmanheyman said: That's it. I should fucking hope so. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 36390 Posted yesterday at 09:55 Share Posted yesterday at 09:55 12 hours ago, OTF said: I should fucking hope so. For now. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OTF 8372 Posted yesterday at 09:58 Share Posted yesterday at 09:58 Just now, Howmanheyman said: For now. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 36390 Posted yesterday at 10:01 Share Posted yesterday at 10:01 1 minute ago, OTF said: 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OTF 8372 Posted yesterday at 11:23 Share Posted yesterday at 11:23 1 hour ago, Howmanheyman said: 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 36390 Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago Eddie is going to have to massively earn his corn for the final, assuming there's no appeal win the idea of Barnes starting horrifies me on the wembley pitch trying to get up and down the flank to attack then defend v Liverpool. Hall being a doubt just intensifies this. Sometimes you can luck into a formation through lack of options and I think this is where we could be at now. You couldn't make it up with first Pope now Gordon getting straight reds just before two finals, we're fucking cursed as a club, man. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now