Andrew 4408 Posted Sunday at 22:58 Share Posted Sunday at 22:58 26 minutes ago, Dr Gloom said: £20m see ya, sucker of course the mancs waited till after the psr deadline Ok to be exact, the ESPN article doesn't say that we've agreed a fee near 20 million, it says Quote Newcastle have been holding firm for a compensation fee of around £20 million and, according to a source, the two clubs are nearing an agreement. Which could mean any amount really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mighty Hog 433 Posted Sunday at 23:43 Share Posted Sunday at 23:43 14 hours ago, ewerk said: Buy a flat field and put some white lines on it. Job done. Don't do it! 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 32164 Posted Monday at 03:03 Share Posted Monday at 03:03 On 29/06/2024 at 18:19, wykikitoon said: Tory boy not happy The hairy cornflake 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 32164 Posted Monday at 03:11 Share Posted Monday at 03:11 (edited) 20 hours ago, Dougle said: We had acres of ballroom (ooer missus) from the years of BFM and yet here we are hours away from hassle because of psr. We didn’t though. We could spend a bit initially but then we were quite heavily restricted by the lack of revenue, which was down to the previous owner’s neglect. The huge steps forward there being something else that has changed at the club (since you were asking). Edited Monday at 03:41 by Alex 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 38354 Posted Monday at 08:32 Share Posted Monday at 08:32 https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5599305/2024/07/01/newcastle-psr-player-sales?source=user-shared-article We were over £50m short on PSR according to this article by Waugh. At over 150% of the allowable loss, I'm not sure a 10 point deduction sounds all that daft. We would have had very little to argue in terms of mitigation. Worth reading the article though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 38354 Posted Monday at 08:35 Share Posted Monday at 08:35 It sounds like it was DCL's wage demands that scuppered his move here, the cheeky permanently injured clown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Carr's Gloves 3440 Posted Monday at 09:00 Share Posted Monday at 09:00 27 minutes ago, Gemmill said: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5599305/2024/07/01/newcastle-psr-player-sales?source=user-shared-article We were over £50m short on PSR according to this article by Waugh. At over 150% of the allowable loss, I'm not sure a 10 point deduction sounds all that daft. We would have had very little to argue in terms of mitigation. Worth reading the article though. Is it really worth reading? 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 38354 Posted Monday at 09:13 Share Posted Monday at 09:13 Only if you want to be informed. I appreciate that doesn't tend to be your style. 😎 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Carr's Gloves 3440 Posted Monday at 09:58 Share Posted Monday at 09:58 44 minutes ago, Gemmill said: Only if you want to be informed. I appreciate that doesn't tend to be your style. 😎 That we would be a good comeback from anyone else in the universe mr relegation predictor. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 38354 Posted Monday at 10:03 Share Posted Monday at 10:03 4 minutes ago, Kevin Carr's Gloves said: That we would be a good comeback from anyone else in the universe mr relegation predictor. That we would be what?! You know what helps improve your writing? Reading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Carr's Gloves 3440 Posted Monday at 10:05 Share Posted Monday at 10:05 1 minute ago, Gemmill said: That we would be what?! You know what helps improve your writing? Reading. A good comeback, do you want me to translate into fuckwit for you? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mighty Hog 433 Posted Monday at 10:10 Share Posted Monday at 10:10 https://archive.ph/lg5SI That's the link if you want to read it without being a Athletic subscriber Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 17954 Posted Monday at 10:29 Author Share Posted Monday at 10:29 How much of this is down to Ashworth being fucking useless I wonder 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 38354 Posted Monday at 10:34 Share Posted Monday at 10:34 3 minutes ago, wykikitoon said: How much of this is down to Ashworth being fucking useless I wonder Ashworth peering over the top of his reading glasses: "Excuse me, you little Yorkshire cunt, you cleared off the bulk of your PSR selling a lad for £33m that I signed a year previous for £7m. So shut your ENTIRE face, please." 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougle 2983 Posted Monday at 11:13 Share Posted Monday at 11:13 34 minutes ago, Gemmill said: Ashworth peering over the top of his reading glasses: "Excuse me, you little Yorkshire cunt, you cleared off the bulk of your PSR selling a lad for £33m that I signed a year previous for £7m. So shut your ENTIRE face, please." Gemmill suckinmg the Ashworth cock: 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 38354 Posted Monday at 11:20 Share Posted Monday at 11:20 They're taking down the Sports Direct font version of "Newcastle United" above the East Stand today. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 29184 Posted Monday at 11:31 Share Posted Monday at 11:31 8 minutes ago, Gemmill said: They're taking down the Sports Direct font version of "Newcastle United" above the East Stand today. The East stand Newcastle United sign, sponsored by [insert company with PIF investment here] has a good ring to it, don't you think? 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holden McGroin 5458 Posted Monday at 12:43 Share Posted Monday at 12:43 1 hour ago, Howmanheyman said: The East stand Newcastle United sign, sponsored by [insert company with PIF investment here] has a good ring to it, don't you think? I don't see any reason why we can't sponsor the stand names The Gallowgate End sponsored by Visit Saudi Arabia (who we are in no way affiliated with ) for £500m 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 27736 Posted Monday at 12:53 Share Posted Monday at 12:53 9 minutes ago, Holden McGroin said: The Gallowgate End sponsored by Visit Saudi Arabia (who we are in no way affiliated with ) for £500m Definitely worth £500m for the gallows synergy alone. 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holden McGroin 5458 Posted Monday at 12:54 Share Posted Monday at 12:54 1 minute ago, ewerk said: Definitely worth £500m for the gallows synergy alone. Imagine the fewm. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 14458 Posted Monday at 13:21 Share Posted Monday at 13:21 27 minutes ago, ewerk said: Definitely worth £500m for the gallows synergy alone. Meanwhile, in honour of our erstwhile fishbowl midfielder, the Leazes is renamed the Jenas Side. 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebrokendoll 7540 Posted Monday at 13:28 Share Posted Monday at 13:28 michael martin's latest truefaith editorial, valid concerns or being a drama queen? you decide..... https://true-faith.co.uk/thru-black-white-eyes-whats-happening-1-jul-24/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 38354 Posted Monday at 14:00 Share Posted Monday at 14:00 (edited) 37 minutes ago, thebrokendoll said: michael martin's latest truefaith editorial, valid concerns or being a drama queen? you decide..... https://true-faith.co.uk/thru-black-white-eyes-whats-happening-1-jul-24/ First off, I like how he starts his piece with (a paraphrased): "There will be clever people that agree with me that these questions need to be asked, but there will also be thick cunt fan boys of the new ownership who can't even tie their own shoes and are happy to go through life with their eyes closed." Always a great way to get people to read the rest of your article. He then immediately reveals that he doesn't know the difference between transfer fees and profit on sale of a player. A bad start. The rest of it is just a typical Michael Martin misery fest. Most of what I assume he thinks are really challenging unexplained questions, are nothing of the sort. Running a football club is hard. Trying to get a completely stagnant football club to compete at the top level is even harder. Trying to do all of that whilst remaining in compliance with crazy PSR rules is harder still. Gambles needed to be taken, and were. And at the end of it all, we've managed to meet our PSR requirements by selling two peripheral players, and getting compensation for a bloke who we were paying a pretty penny to sit around his house. A pretty successful outcome all things considered. And all this bloke wants to do is piss and moan about it. Gordon and Isak are still here, but he wants to fucking moan about the fact that they might not have been. We've had our pants pulled down cos Man United only paid a reported £8m for Ashworth. What a misery. Edited Monday at 14:06 by Gemmill 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 20567 Posted Monday at 14:28 Share Posted Monday at 14:28 24 minutes ago, Gemmill said: First off, I like how he starts his piece with (a paraphrased): "There will be clever people that agree with me that these questions need to be asked, but there will also be thick cunt fan boys of the new ownership who can't even tie their own shoes and are happy to go through life with their eyes closed." Always a great way to get people to read the rest of your article. He then immediately reveals that he doesn't know the difference between transfer fees and profit on sale of a player. A bad start. The rest of it is just a typical Michael Martin misery fest. Most of what I assume he thinks are really challenging unexplained questions, are nothing of the sort. Running a football club is hard. Trying to get a completely stagnant football club to compete at the top level is even harder. Trying to do all of that whilst remaining in compliance with crazy PSR rules is harder still. Gambles needed to be taken, and were. And at the end of it all, we've managed to meet our PSR requirements by selling two peripheral players, and getting compensation for a bloke who we were paying a pretty penny to sit around his house. A pretty successful outcome all things considered. And all this bloke wants to do is piss and moan about it. Gordon and Isak are still here, but he wants to fucking moan about the fact that they might not have been. We've had our pants pulled down cos Man United only paid a reported £8m for Ashworth. What a misery. reading his copy brings me out in hives 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 32164 Posted Monday at 14:53 Share Posted Monday at 14:53 Louise Taylor-esque Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now