wykikitoon 20836 Posted August 9 Share Posted August 9 Oi @trophyshyor Admin sort it out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15740 Posted August 9 Share Posted August 9 Like Noah Lyles with Covid, you're just too slow 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 20836 Posted August 9 Share Posted August 9 Legend, good man Meenzer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 20836 Posted August 9 Share Posted August 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 46096 Posted August 9 Share Posted August 9 Chelsea have found another 60m Euros down the back of the sofa to sign Pedro Neto. I don't know how the PL hasn't called them in to ask where the fuck all this cash is coming from. Anyway, that cunt is permanently injured, and Chelsea's squad is ENORMOUS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 20836 Posted August 9 Share Posted August 9 Exactly my thinking Wor Kev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 20836 Posted August 9 Share Posted August 9 *cough* @Kid Dynamite 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10972 Posted August 9 Share Posted August 9 1 hour ago, wykikitoon said: This would take their first team squad to around 43 players. Now, I'm sure there'll be some departures, some loan deals, but fucking hell. By contrast, Arsenal have 24, Aston Villa have 30, Liverpool have 30 Man City have 28 (and that includes Alvarez who'll be off), Man Utd have 28 and we have 35 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aimaad22 4222 Posted August 9 Share Posted August 9 3 hours ago, Gemmill said: Chelsea have found another 60m Euros down the back of the sofa to sign Pedro Neto. I don't know how the PL hasn't called them in to ask where the fuck all this cash is coming from. Anyway, that cunt is permanently injured, and Chelsea's squad is ENORMOUS. They've signed a bunch of youth players in the 20-25M range as well who will remain with their current clubs for a year or so. They'll likely be bailed out by Saudi again; or maybe rent their dressing rooms to themselves or something like that for 20M a week and not one person in the PL or media will question it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego21 2138 Posted August 9 Share Posted August 9 Pedro Neto is a good player, but I will be shocked if my club invest 60M in a player that have missed more than 100 matches because the injuries in the last 3 seasons. And I am not sure he was better than Mudryk, Madueke, Palmer, Sterling, etc etc etc 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aimaad22 4222 Posted August 9 Share Posted August 9 12 minutes ago, Diego21 said: And I am not sure he was better than Mudryk, Madueke, Palmer, Sterling, etc etc etc Eh? While I agree the injury record would be a concern for anyone and Chelsea's tranfer plans are generally haphazard; he's miles better than any of the players on that list ( seriously Mudryk? ) Barring Palmer perhaps but he's a different type of player than him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strawb 4385 Posted August 9 Share Posted August 9 I honestly think Mudryk would be decent at a team where he plays every week and feels valued. He has all the raw ingredients to be a really dangerous winger imo. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 46096 Posted August 9 Share Posted August 9 9 minutes ago, strawb said: I honestly think Mudryk would be decent at a team where he plays every week and feels valued. He has all the raw ingredients to be a really dangerous winger imo. Aye, when he's on it he's fucking electric. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strawb 4385 Posted August 9 Share Posted August 9 Problem is he will be stuck there rotting now, cos they over paid for him and he is over paid. For is it 7 or 9 years? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Hermione 14069 Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 Madueke on loan with an obligation similar to the Hall deal really does seem like a no-brainer. Might be a solid tactic to just wait and see how many players Chelsea add to that bloated squad and just cherry pick whoever we want. Seems like Boehly just loves doing deals, no matter if it’s spending or selling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaser 1267 Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 Talent just being wasted there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzler 10382 Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 22 minutes ago, Chaser said: Talent just being wasted there. All those players and only two right backs. One of whom is eternally injured Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 31229 Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 I’m not sure Fofana is much of a CF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diego21 2138 Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 14 hours ago, aimaad22 said: Eh? While I agree the injury record would be a concern for anyone and Chelsea's tranfer plans are generally haphazard; he's miles better than any of the players on that list ( seriously Mudryk? ) Barring Palmer perhaps but he's a different type of player than him. Mudryk has unique qualities for the world of football. I don't see many players faster than him or with better conditions to gain advantages. I'm totally serious. But the boy needs a lot of things. Adaptation, surely. Someone really trusting him and putting him in. Because we haven't seen him at Chelsea for 4 games in a row yet. I remember how the whole world laughed at Vinicius in his first 2-3 years at Real Madrid. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wackyjunior 40 Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 I'm canny pissed off that we have a transfer thread then a thread for a player we haven't signed. It's not protocol and J69 all over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aimaad22 4222 Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 7 hours ago, Diego21 said: Mudryk has unique qualities for the world of football. I don't see many players faster than him or with better conditions to gain advantages. I'm totally serious. But the boy needs a lot of things. Adaptation, surely. Someone really trusting him and putting him in. Because we haven't seen him at Chelsea for 4 games in a row yet. I remember how the whole world laughed at Vinicius in his first 2-3 years at Real Madrid. Yeah I don't disagree with that. Mudryk is just very raw, I question if he has the mental qualities, no doubt he has some great physical attributes. I do kind of feel for him though as Chelsea must be one of the worst places right now for players to develop. Neto is practically the same age as him and has torn up premier league defences almost everytime he's played. So I get why Chelsea would prefer him, injury record aside. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 7182 Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 9 hours ago, ewerk said: I’m not sure Fofana is much of a CF. I mean he plays there for his national team https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Datro_Fofana Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 31229 Posted August 10 Share Posted August 10 Aye and he isn’t very good at it. That was obviously my point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 20836 Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 This whole thing with him and the other guy from joining from Nice needs investigating. Some fucking wrong doing here by Ratcliffe. Where the fuck have West Ham got their brass from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebrokendoll 9466 Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cd05ereye7do chelsea rapidly approaching £200m for the summer. us meanwhile.... 20p in agents fees for john ruddy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now