Jump to content

Transfers, 2024-25 season


trophyshy
 Share

Recommended Posts

Chelsea have found another 60m Euros down the back of the sofa to sign Pedro Neto. I don't know how the PL hasn't called them in to ask where the fuck all this cash is coming from. 

 

Anyway, that cunt is permanently injured, and Chelsea's squad is ENORMOUS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wykikitoon said:

 

 

This would take their first team squad to around 43 players. Now, I'm sure there'll be some departures, some loan deals, but fucking hell.

 

 

By contrast,

Arsenal have 24,

Aston Villa have 30,

Liverpool have 30

Man City have 28 (and that includes Alvarez who'll be off),

Man Utd have 28

and we have 35

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Gemmill said:

Chelsea have found another 60m Euros down the back of the sofa to sign Pedro Neto. I don't know how the PL hasn't called them in to ask where the fuck all this cash is coming from. 

 

Anyway, that cunt is permanently injured, and Chelsea's squad is ENORMOUS. 

 

They've signed a bunch of youth players in the 20-25M range as well who will remain with their current clubs for a year or so.

 

They'll likely be bailed out by Saudi again; or maybe rent their dressing rooms to themselves or something like that for 20M a week and not one person in the PL or media will question it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pedro Neto is a good player, but I will be shocked if my club invest 60M in a player that have missed more than 100 matches because the injuries in the last 3 seasons. And I am not sure he was better than Mudryk, Madueke, Palmer, Sterling, etc etc etc206760800_Screenshot(27).png.c10586057ed66e457ad03e33c5d30b66.png

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Diego21 said:

And I am not sure he was better than Mudryk, Madueke, Palmer, Sterling, etc etc etc

 

 

Eh? While I agree the injury record would be a concern for anyone and Chelsea's tranfer plans are generally haphazard; he's miles better than any of the players on that list ( seriously Mudryk? :lol:) Barring Palmer perhaps but he's a different type of player than him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly think Mudryk would be decent at a team where he plays every week and feels valued. He has all the raw ingredients to be a really dangerous winger imo. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, strawb said:

I honestly think Mudryk would be decent at a team where he plays every week and feels valued. He has all the raw ingredients to be a really dangerous winger imo. 

 

Aye, when he's on it he's fucking electric. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem is he will be stuck there rotting now, cos they over paid for him and he is over paid. For is it 7 or 9 years? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Madueke on loan with an obligation similar to the Hall deal really does seem like a no-brainer. Might be a solid tactic to just wait and see how many players Chelsea add to that bloated squad and just cherry pick whoever we want. Seems like Boehly just loves doing deals, no matter if it’s spending or selling 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Chaser said:

IMG-20240809-WA0001.jpg.6d17f9a15870e71b4d30d4dfbb5d80c8.jpg

 

Talent just being wasted there.

All those players and only two right backs. One of whom is eternally injured :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, aimaad22 said:

 

 

Eh? While I agree the injury record would be a concern for anyone and Chelsea's tranfer plans are generally haphazard; he's miles better than any of the players on that list ( seriously Mudryk? :lol:) Barring Palmer perhaps but he's a different type of player than him. 

Mudryk has unique qualities for the world of football. I don't see many players faster than him or with better conditions to gain advantages. I'm totally serious.

But the boy needs a lot of things. Adaptation, surely. Someone really trusting him and putting him in. Because we haven't seen him at Chelsea for 4 games in a row yet.

I remember how the whole world laughed at Vinicius in his first 2-3 years at Real Madrid.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Diego21 said:

Mudryk has unique qualities for the world of football. I don't see many players faster than him or with better conditions to gain advantages. I'm totally serious.

But the boy needs a lot of things. Adaptation, surely. Someone really trusting him and putting him in. Because we haven't seen him at Chelsea for 4 games in a row yet.

I remember how the whole world laughed at Vinicius in his first 2-3 years at Real Madrid.

 

Yeah I don't disagree with that. Mudryk is just very raw, I question if he has the mental qualities, no doubt he has some great physical attributes. I do kind of feel for him though as Chelsea must be one of the worst places right now for players to develop. 

 

Neto is practically the same age as him and has torn up premier league defences almost everytime he's played. So I get why Chelsea would prefer him, injury record aside. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

This whole thing with him and the other guy from joining from Nice needs investigating.  Some fucking wrong doing here by Ratcliffe.  Where the fuck have West Ham got their brass from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.