Dr Gloom 22189 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 anyone feel like we missed a trick not going for kalvin phillips? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 20899 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 23 minutes ago, Dr Gloom said: anyone feel like we missed a trick not going for kalvin phillips? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 17727 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 23 minutes ago, Dr Gloom said: anyone feel like we missed a trick not going for kalvin phillips? Just now, wykikitoon said: Which part of 7 mill with an obligation to buy do you people not understand? Howe doesn’t fancy him on those terms. There’s over a week left of the window and things are plainly moving behind the scenes. Anyway… …. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 31236 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzler 10438 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 6 minutes ago, PaddockLad said: Which part of 7 mill with an obligation to buy do you people not understand? Howe doesn’t fancy him on those terms. There’s over a week left of the window and things are plainly moving behind the scenes. Anyway… …. Here's me thinking Bayern were storming the league since Sky Sports never shuts the fuck up about Kane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzler 10438 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Also, if Bayern want Howe the compensation package is set at a very low and very fair £350m. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 20899 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 4 minutes ago, PaddockLad said: Which part of 7 mill with an obligation to buy do you people not understand? Howe doesn’t fancy him on those terms. There’s over a week left of the window and things are plainly moving behind the scenes. Anyway… …. Oh the fee with obligation to buy, yeh, I get that. West Ham have an OPTION to buy I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 17727 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 6 minutes ago, wykikitoon said: Oh the fee with obligation to buy, yeh, I get that. West Ham have an OPTION to buy I think. We didn’t want him, I think we should all move on from this ☺️ 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holden McGroin 6793 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 (edited) 7 minutes ago, PaddockLad said: We didn’t want him, I think we should all move on from this ☺️ or couldnt afford him. Either way, he is gone. Edited January 24 by Holden McGroin 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 20899 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 12 minutes ago, PaddockLad said: We didn’t want him, I think we should all move on from this ☺️ or like Holden said, we didn't think it was viable financially. He's gone fair enough, but think he could have been a good option for us. So far nothing has made me doubt the process we are going through so I am happy with it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobinRobin 11640 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 1 hour ago, Dazzler said: It's bionic now after his surgery - fear not. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10975 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 32 minutes ago, wykikitoon said: Oh the fee with obligation to buy, yeh, I get that. West Ham have an OPTION to buy I think. £7m for a loan that might not work out and no resale value or £7m a year for a £35m player who we can hawk to Saudi for twice his value? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 20899 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 4858 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Never mind getting a ticket, I could be getting a game at this rate 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 33945 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 "Penfoooooolddd!!!!" "Yes?" "Is this fucking you?!" 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzler 10438 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 2 minutes ago, Howmanheyman said: "Penfoooooolddd!!!!" "Yes?" "Is this fucking you?!" 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 22189 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 45 minutes ago, PaddockLad said: We didn’t want him, I think we should all move on from this ☺️ if that is true, i would ask why. he looks like exactly the sort of player that would have helped with our midfield crisis. capable of playing number 6 or number 8. perhaps we had concerns over his fitness, i dunno. i hope he doesn't turn out to be another diaby/madison. we have missed out on a number of players we were strongly linked with since last summer, all of whom did well elsewhere, while most of our transfers have underwhelmed for various reasons. i hope we don't live to regret this one too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 22189 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 24 minutes ago, wykikitoon said: what's the point? surely the fee is going to be negligible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10975 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 3 minutes ago, Dr Gloom said: what's the point? surely the fee is going to be negligible. What ever it is, will be pure profit in PSR terms. Getting his wages off the books as well. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 22189 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 Just now, The Fish said: What ever it is, will be pure profit in PSR terms. Getting his wages off the books as well. he'll be on mike ashley era wages though. is letting him go now going to have much impact on our january transfer dealings? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 22189 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 we'd be losing a reliable 3rd choice CB for no obvious gain 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzler 10438 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 1 minute ago, Dr Gloom said: we'd be losing a reliable 3rd choice CB for no obvious gain As well as a long serving, well liked and respected club captain - If Bayern make an offer for Trippier that we can't turn down then we lose both leaders in the squad in Jan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10975 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 5 minutes ago, Dr Gloom said: he'll be on mike ashley era wages though. is letting him go now going to have much impact on our january transfer dealings? £50k a week, reportedly, and if we get, say £7m for him, that's a £35m player over 5yrs. We got Botman for £39m. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 22189 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 1 minute ago, Dazzler said: As well as a long serving, well liked and respected club captain - If Bayern make an offer for Trippier that we can't turn down then we lose both leaders in the squad in Jan. I could understand the trippier one more. i don't want to sell him either but if BM offer something daft in the region of £20m then it would be hard to turn down from a FFP perspective as it would free up money to spend in this window in areas where we're short and Tino can step in to replace him. It would also be hard to deny Trippier the opportunity to potentially win more trophies at the tail end of his career in Germany if his heart is set on it. I'm struggling to see the benefits in losing Lascelles for peanuts when our reserve options at CB are Burn, who has looked very poor in that position this season, and Krafth, who will do a job but is essentially a full back playing out of position, when the transfer fee for Lascelles plus his Ashley-era wages will have little impact on our ability to invest in this window. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 22189 Posted January 24 Share Posted January 24 3 minutes ago, The Fish said: £50k a week, reportedly, and if we get, say £7m for him, that's a £35m player over 5yrs. We got Botman for £39m. you think they're paying £7m for a player with six months left on his contract? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now