Jump to content

Transfers, 2024-25 season


trophyshy
 Share

Recommended Posts

Of all the players on the "list" of saleable assets I think Tripps and Wilson are the right type. The right balance of ability and age to get good transfer fees, lower the wage bill meaningfully, and avoid losing players with capacity to improve and lose players before they decline and their sale value evaporates.

 

It's still quite novel to be able to rationalise and see the logic to our transfer activity. Agree or disagree, at least it makes sense.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Isegrim said:

Hope is now saying that Atletico are in for Wilson

That would be a fucking mental transfer. He'd do well for them, but fuck me if you'd told me a few years ago that Wilson would get relegated with Bournemouth and end up knocking in goals for Athletico I'd have laughed in your face.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, wykikitoon said:

Would rather Trips and Wilson went over Isak, Bruno or Botman 

I’d rather Targett, Hendrick, Krafh, Dummett, Murphy, Burn, Karius, Lascelles, Dubrakva, Gillespie, Hall,Longstaff,  Fraser and Hayden were sold before Trips and Wilson. 
 

The Sandlot Kiss GIF by 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Holden McGroin said:

I’d rather Targett, Hendrick, Krafh, Dummett, Murphy, Burn, Karius, Lascelles, Dubrakva, Gillespie, Hall,Longstaff,  Fraser and Hayden were sold before Trips and Wilson. 

 

It kind goes without saying that if it were as simple as selling who we wanted to sell for a price that made sense then most of that lot would already be gone.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wilson should only leave if there is a team that can pay close to 20M for him.

Trippier should only leave if the club saw that it was impossible to pay him the salary he earns and that would fix almost all of Fair Play's financial problems.

Then, you have to get rid of all the absurd contracts of players like Ritchie, Targett, Krafth, Manquillo, Hayden, Fraser, Karius....

PS: It is impossible for Atlético to pay a single euro for Wilson. We never have money.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Manquillo is as good as gone, if we do get rid of Tripps then keeping Krafth til the summer gives us cover (he's out then anyway). Fraser seems to be doing ok down south so hopeful he gets a move from that, Hendrick, Karius and Ritchie all expire in the summer. Hayden is the only one who looks like it's looking difficult to shift given he's contracted until 2026! Targett is also 2026 but at least he's useful. 

Edited by Chaser
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Chaser said:

Manquillo is as good as gone, if we do get rid of Tripps then keeping Krafth til the summer gives us cover (he's out then anyway). Fraser seems to be doing ok down south so hopeful he gets a move from that, Hendrick, Karius and Ritchie all expire in the summer. Hayden is the only one who looks like it's looking difficult to shift given he's contracted until 2026! Targett is also 2026 but at least he's useful. 

Targett hasn't been useful practically since we signed him permanently. Not his fault but he still hasn't made much of an impression even when he's been fit. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still have hope that Targett could be a useful squad player, especially if he is capable of playing 6 for some added versatility, which appears to have been the plan moving forward based on the few minutes he lasted against ManU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, toonotl said:

I still have hope that Targett could be a useful squad player, especially if he is capable of playing 6 for some added versatility, which appears to have been the plan moving forward based on the few minutes he lasted against ManU.

We live in hope. 👍 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, wykikitoon said:

 

 

 


I'm a bit perplexed why Eales is telling by anyone who will listen that we need to sell before we can buy, and then we get offers for 2 players and refuse to sell? I mean I don't particularly want either of them to move on, but I also don't want Miley and Longstaff to be our midfield for half a season, or for Almiron to have zero competition for his place 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Gemmill said:

He didn't say we'd have to sell before we could buy, did he? I thought he just said we would have to trade players like other clubs do. 

 

 

 

We are playing semantics, but it's as good as what he said 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not though. We have to sell before we buy means we categorically cannot buy anyone until we bring some money in from player sales. 

 

He didn't say that so there's no reason to assume that it's true. 

 

You then said "if we need to sell before we buy, why are we turning down offers for players". But nobody every said we had to sell before we could buy.

 

So the specific language really is important and it isn't just semantics. 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Meenzer changed the title to Transfers, 2024-25 season

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.