wykikitoon 22901 Posted February 2, 2023 Share Posted February 2, 2023 19 minutes ago, Kevin Carr's Gloves said: If you start us off with the tune we’ll join in on the chorus Oh L'amouurrrrrrr............................. Broke my heart 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 36725 Posted February 2, 2023 Share Posted February 2, 2023 16 hours ago, Holden McGroin said: I know what you are saying and feel similalry. However, I reckon Almiron can play the number 8 position for example - in a similar manner to Willock. After that....can we get Hendrick back? 🤪 Before Bruce did his best to ruin Almiron, I seem to remember him having some good games in an advanced central role 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 23642 Posted February 2, 2023 Share Posted February 2, 2023 2 hours ago, Alex said: Before Bruce did his best to ruin Almiron, I seem to remember him having some good games in an advanced central role yeah, he looked good, but it was more of a number 10 position, tucked in behind the striker wasn't it? he looked lost playing in the deeper role under bruce. but then, who didn't? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 19013 Posted February 2, 2023 Share Posted February 2, 2023 All this pissing about the lack of options in midfield etc, for me we have an abundance of options there compared with at the back where a long term injury to Dan Burn significantly weakens two positions. And we will get injuries. Relatively happy with the window, I think Eddie understands how lots of incomings would upset the balance in the changing room, lack of options in January but most of all FFP clipping our wings and not being able to overhaul a distinctly average squad in only three windows. Having said all that a couple of loans wouldn’t have gone amiss but no point moaning on like a fuckin big girls blouse is there? 😀 4 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 11323 Posted February 2, 2023 Share Posted February 2, 2023 22 minutes ago, PaddockLad said: All this pissing about the lack of options in midfield etc, for me we have an abundance of options there compared with at the back where a long term injury to Dan Burn significantly weakens two positions. And we will get injuries. Relatively happy with the window, I think Eddie understands how lots of incomings would upset the balance in the changing room, lack of options in January but most of all FFP clipping our wings and not being able to overhaul a distinctly average squad in only three windows. Having said all that a couple of loans wouldn’t have gone amiss but no point moaning on like a fuckin big girls blouse is there? 😀 You calling @LongTimeAdmirer a big girls blouse? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 19013 Posted February 2, 2023 Share Posted February 2, 2023 5 minutes ago, The Fish said: You calling @LongTimeAdmirer a big girls blouse? Yes, whoever the fuck they are. His mams a poof too PS I bet you’re the one in your work group who needlessly copies in people they shouldn’ to emails, eg bosses, people who are a pain in the arse etc etc . You’re that guy, aren’t you Dave? 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toonpack 11370 Posted February 2, 2023 Share Posted February 2, 2023 Just now, PaddockLad said: Yes, whoever the fuck they are. His mams a poof too PS I bet you’re the one in your work group who needlessly copies in people they shouldn’ to emails, eg bosses, people who are a pain in the arse etc etc . You’re that guy, aren’t you Dave? You calling Dave a yank ?? That's their standard practice - toady cunts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 19013 Posted February 2, 2023 Share Posted February 2, 2023 7 minutes ago, Toonpack said: You calling Dave a yank ?? That's their standard practice - toady cunts Dave’s a yank and his dad wears a red MAGA cap 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 11323 Posted February 2, 2023 Share Posted February 2, 2023 6 minutes ago, PaddockLad said: Yes, whoever the fuck they are. His mams a poof too PS I bet you’re the one in your work group who needlessly copies in people they shouldn’ to emails, eg bosses, people who are a pain in the arse etc etc . You’re that guy, aren’t you Dave? Oh I go further than that, I'll BCC someone into an email chain. Hell, I'll wait until I'm on a call with someone, then say "Oh, I'll just see if [Senior Manager] is free." and add them to the call as an ambush. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 19013 Posted February 2, 2023 Share Posted February 2, 2023 1 minute ago, The Fish said: Oh I go further than that, I'll BCC someone into an email chain. Hell, I'll wait until I'm on a call with someone, then say "Oh, I'll just see if [Senior Manager] is free." and add them to the call as an ambush. in a way, I admire that level of cuntishness 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 11323 Posted February 2, 2023 Share Posted February 2, 2023 1 minute ago, PaddockLad said: in a way, I admire that level of cuntishness Oh, that isn't even the half of it. Sometimes text has an invisible character in it, it looks like a space, but it's not. It's a 'nbsp' or nonbreaking space. So when that character is in SQL or Excel codes or formula it won't work. And unless you know it's there you can waste hours or your day trying to work out why your code or formula won't work. This is a space -> <- This is a nbsp -> <- 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobinRobin 12486 Posted February 2, 2023 Share Posted February 2, 2023 Thanks for explaining Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 11323 Posted February 2, 2023 Share Posted February 2, 2023 1 hour ago, RobinRobin said: Thanks for explaining I like dropping nbsp's into other people's code. Because Fuck you Roel and your leaving early on a Friday ass, meaning I get all your bullshit work. That's Why! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strawb 4639 Posted February 2, 2023 Share Posted February 2, 2023 Roel isn’t a name 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 11323 Posted February 2, 2023 Share Posted February 2, 2023 56 minutes ago, strawb said: Roel isn’t a name Roel - Wiktionary Oh, yes it is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 11323 Posted February 2, 2023 Share Posted February 2, 2023 37 minutes ago, LongTimeAdmirer said: Im officially off the stats, xG and excel team, youre on your own now. Darling, I've always ploughed a lonely furrow. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 36725 Posted February 2, 2023 Share Posted February 2, 2023 1 hour ago, strawb said: Roel isn’t a name What about Roel Fox? 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 36725 Posted February 2, 2023 Share Posted February 2, 2023 2 hours ago, The Fish said: I like dropping nbsp's into other people's code. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 11323 Posted February 2, 2023 Share Posted February 2, 2023 13 minutes ago, Alex said: What about Roel Fox? Sausage Roel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 16446 Posted February 2, 2023 Share Posted February 2, 2023 16 minutes ago, Alex said: Roel Fox 3 minutes ago, The Fish said: Sausage Roel Come on England, give us a goal! 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OTF 8418 Posted February 2, 2023 Share Posted February 2, 2023 4 hours ago, Alex said: What about Roel Fox? Roel Dahl 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polarboy 2317 Posted February 2, 2023 Share Posted February 2, 2023 (edited) According to the Evening Standard we're at the head of the queue for Gallagher come the summer market. There's some rule that means that it's better financially to sell homegrown players so Chelsea are set to clear out players like Gallagher, Loftus-Cheek etc. so they can go on yet another spending binge. I know the majority on here would prefer Maddison, but I honestly think Gallagher, who's four years younger, is potentially of a similar level to Maddison and has a better all round game given he's much better at the defensive side of the game. I'd love to see how much Howe could improve him, again given he's relatively young. Obviously getting both would be the ideal, but I can't see us spunking 80 odd million on two fairly similar players. Edited February 2, 2023 by Polarboy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 23642 Posted February 2, 2023 Share Posted February 2, 2023 If you go for Gallagher you’re buying potential. Nothing wrong with that and it fits the profile of recent signings. He’s not as good technically as Maddison now though. Maddison would be the statement signing because he’s coming into his prime years. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strawb 4639 Posted February 2, 2023 Share Posted February 2, 2023 They are completely different players. Also isn’t Gallagher 24? Hardly a kid. Would be happy with either for different reasons. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 23642 Posted February 2, 2023 Share Posted February 2, 2023 12 minutes ago, strawb said: They are completely different players. Also isn’t Gallagher 24? Hardly a kid. Would be happy with either for different reasons. He’s 22. Maddison is 26 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now