Jump to content

Transfers, 2024-25 season


trophyshy
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

6 minutes ago, Alex said:

That’s fine, if you were being reasonable and making constructive criticism. Rather than arguing this window has been disastrous. Or insisting a player who’s contributed next to fuck all should be starting in a side that’s got to a cup final and to 3rd in the league mostly without him. Fair enough though, you could just be clueless 👍🏻


The Room GIF by MOODMAN

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our business is in improving oir squad through buying who we want, not just who we can. The last who we can signings came last season. Botman, Isak, Gordon and Ashby are all players who we have tracked over multiple windows drawing the interest of the players and completing the purchases without being held to ransom. The next player in the same category is Maddison and we no doubt have plans to complete that signing in the summer. If we qualify for the champions league there will be a requirement to bring in more players so an influx of future funding will.move forward other signings.

 

It's not hyperbole, it is genuinely difficult to sign quality players in January because clubs do not want to lose good players mid-season.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think before the window I said that for me Striker, backup Rightback and DM were priorities. 

 

We've signed a wide forward/midfielder and a back up rightback. 

 

I'm pretty happy about that, sure it would have been great to sign some exciting young talent from Brazil, or grabbing Maddison off Leicester. But I trust the people running the club. Bruno missing 3 games is rough, but with Longstaff, Joelinton, Joe Willock, Anderson, we have 4 central mids, and we've been pushing a central midfielder out onto the left wing for the recent games. 

 

Longstaff will drop deeper, Joelinton and Willock will play in front of him. Gordon/ASM on the left, Almiron/Isak on the right, Wilson/Isak up front. 

 

Gordon is relentless in the press so will add balance to our attack,  Ashby looks a real prospect at rightback so we can give Trippier a bit of a rest during games too. 

 

I'd say B-

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more I think about it the more I think the Gordon signing is a great one.

 

Balances up the two flanks nicely, that bit of pace will help out Burns major weakness which is his lack of pace. Also with his high work rate, press and good dribbling it stretches their defence so less likely Miggy is going to be doubled up on and give him more space.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, The Fish said:

 

Gordon is relentless in the press so will add balance to our attack,  Ashby looks a real prospect at rightback so we can give Trippier a bit of a rest during games too. 

 

I'd say xG

 

FYP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, RobElliott said:

The more I think about it the more I think the Gordon signing is a great one.

 

Balances up the two flanks nicely, that bit of pace will help out Burns major weakness which is his lack of pace. Also with his high work rate, press and good dribbling it stretches their defence so less likely Miggy is going to be doubled up on and give him more space.

 

Yep. He was the only player that looked dangerous when we played Everton last season. The fact that he managed to do so in such a gutless, pedestrian side speaks volumes.

 

He's an ambitious, confident player with an engine and one thing you can't train - pure speed. He'll fit straight into our style of play and will give some balance to our attack.

 

The other thing about watching him previously was that I really didn't like him, which is a sure sign that there's some quality about him.

 

He'll be shithousing for us from this point forth, can you imagine how annoying that face is going to be for other teams and their supporters as we overwhelm them with our pressing and beat them.

 

Snl Smile GIF by Saturday Night Live

Edited by OTF
  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Kid Dynamite said:

Be interested to see if Gordon or ASM gets the LW spot in the next game. And surely Isak has to start? 

Think Isak misses through concussion protocol.

ASM may just get the nod due to him knowing our system.  He knows what Eddie wants him to do, just doesn't do it as he's a lazy cunt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isak Wilson Miggy

Joe Longy Joe

Usual 4 at the back 

 

Only issue is that we've only got Anderson as a CM as back up, the rest - ASM, Gordon, Murphy, Ritchie are all wingers. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seen Danny Mills say Bruno's straight red was a disgrace because he wasn't actually out of control in the tackle. I think by the letter of the law you have to be out of control for it to be deemed dangerous, or obviously that's what Mills is implying. Then again it still could have broken the players ankle, but I suppose the weird way he controlled it made it so Bruno was far more likely to make contact. It would be amazing if we could get it reduced to a second yellow, but I won't be holding my breath. If memory serves you also run the risk of games being added to the suspension if you bring forward what they deem to be an unwarranted challenge to said decision. 

Edited by Polarboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, wykikitoon said:

Think Isak misses through concussion protocol.

ASM may just get the nod due to him knowing our system.  He knows what Eddie wants him to do, just doesn't do it as he's a lazy cunt. 

 

ASM may know the system, but he seems reluctant to put it in practice, the tart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could you play Isak as a 10 to make up for the loss of Bruno’s creativity? With Joelinton and Longstaff playing as two more holding type players to make up for that? Just slightly tweaking the tried and tested formula. It would need a grafter in both the wide roles though 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Kid Dynamite said:

Be interested to see if Gordon or ASM gets the LW spot in the next game. And surely Isak has to start? 

Howe's not really been one to throw new signings straight in. I'd expect ASM or even Murphy to get the nod. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The Fish said:

Howe's not really been one to throw new signings straight in. I'd expect ASM or even Murphy to get the nod. 

 

Aye, I think it’ll be a big indicator of ASMs future if Murphy starts. There’s surely no argument that ASM isn’t fit at this point so if he doesn’t start it’s clear he’s just not favored. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LongTimeAdmirer said:

 

If you're going to call me clueless ya muppet, at least address what I said.

1. Their was no criticism about our league position or cup run, nor did I mention maxim not playing. 

2. Saint Allan should be starting every game, you clearly don't like fun football.

 

I like winning 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Alex said:

Could you play Isak as a 10 to make up for the loss of Bruno’s creativity? With Joelinton and Longstaff playing as two more holding type players to make up for that? Just slightly tweaking the tried and tested formula. It would need a grafter in both the wide roles though 

Like a 4-2-3-1? 

 

Pope

Trippier Schar Botman Burn

Longstaff Joelinton

Almiron --- Isak --- Gordon

Wilson

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The Fish said:

Like a 4-2-3-1? 

 

Pope

Trippier Schar Botman Burn

Longstaff Joelinton

Almiron --- Isak --- Gordon

Wilson

 

 

I was thinking more of a 4-2-1-2-1

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just joking, but aye something along those lines. I actually think it’ll be the same shape as usual though. Willock Longstaff and Joelinton in midfield with one of Isak, Gordon or ASM on the left. Although I’d expect Isak to drop into positions inside and behind Wilson more if he started there 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Alex said:

Could you play Isak as a 10 to make up for the loss of Bruno’s creativity? With Joelinton and Longstaff playing as two more holding type players to make up for that? Just slightly tweaking the tried and tested formula. It would need a grafter in both the wide roles though 

 

i think you'll find that's known as a double pivot these days

 

image.png.a2175455cc1c80a0eede4c7d5cada85f.png

  • Haha 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dr Gloom said:

 

i think you'll find that's known as a double pivot these days

 

image.png.a2175455cc1c80a0eede4c7d5cada85f.png

Yeah, employing them as a double 6. With a flake and monkey’s blood 

  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Alex said:

Yeah, employing them as a double 6. With a flake and monkey’s blood 

 Harumph, that was a 99 (double 9) in my day, AND ALWAYS WILL BE what's this 66 bollocks.

 

Fucking young'uns

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Meenzer changed the title to Transfers, 2024-25 season

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.