Dazzler 12449 Posted January 16, 2024 Share Posted January 16, 2024 On 15/01/2024 at 23:25, Chaser said: Yeah the two of them together have pretty much fucked us. Barnes was supposed to be fit by Christmas and he's only just running by the sounds of it. Expand Is his injury not similar to Targett's weird one from last season? His was also a seemingly vague and non-serious foot injury and yet barely made the bench the rest of the season. It's a weird one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 11379 Posted January 16, 2024 Share Posted January 16, 2024 On 15/01/2024 at 19:52, Howay said: It does depend though, I think winning the Europa League nets about €20m - fail to reach the final and you’d get just over half that - Kalvin Phillips alone would be over half that between fee and wages all hitting this year. There’d also still be a large chance we missed out with him. Expand It's not just about the prize money though. Being in European competitions regularly makes us way, way more attractive to commercial sponsors. So while we might bomb out in the 1/4s and pull in £10m, we could sign commercial deals that eclipse that. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobinRobin 12753 Posted January 16, 2024 Share Posted January 16, 2024 On 16/01/2024 at 09:31, The Fish said: It's not just about the prize money though. Being in European competitions regularly makes us way, way more attractive to commercial sponsors. So while we might bomb out in the 1/4s and pull in £10m, we could sign commercial deals that eclipse that. Expand Also will make sponsorship from Saudi more palatable to premier league rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonBlue 1049 Posted January 16, 2024 Share Posted January 16, 2024 it was only a matter of time..... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holden McGroin 7823 Posted January 16, 2024 Share Posted January 16, 2024 (edited) Will titles be stripped if you're found guilty? If not we should just blow 10bn on players in the summer. Win the league then CL.....then take a relegation or 2. Edited January 16, 2024 by Holden McGroin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzler 12449 Posted January 16, 2024 Share Posted January 16, 2024 I reckon even if they were stripped of the titles officially I doubt their fans would give a shit. They still have the memories. So, even if we blow billions in the summer, win the league and then the CL only to be stripped of them and relegated to the Conference North I'd still remember the successes even if they aren't officially recognised. Also, imagine how fucking good Joelinton would be in the conference man. He'd smash them all to bits. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 19448 Posted January 16, 2024 Share Posted January 16, 2024 The PL are preparing a fudge on Man City, guilty on some not guilty on others so a points deduction for the season they eventually present their defence and a heavy fine. Can’t see them being stripped of their titles, that would make the PL look utterly fuckin incompetent 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isegrim 10676 Posted January 16, 2024 Share Posted January 16, 2024 They probably will get away because of lapse of time for those charges they are found guilty of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzler 12449 Posted January 16, 2024 Share Posted January 16, 2024 On 16/01/2024 at 12:14, PaddockLad said: The PL are preparing a fudge on Man City, guilty on some not guilty on others so a points deduction for the season they eventually present their defence and a heavy fine. Can’t see them being stripped of their titles, that would make the PL look utterly fuckin incompetent Expand I want them to avoid a points deduction, purely and utterly to see the reaction of the Everton fans. It's already funny seeing them hold up their shitty little "corrupt" signs, it would be even funnier if those signs were dotted with the tears of the blue mackems. That said, for consistency Man City should really have the book thrown at them with at least a 10 point deduction - they won't, but they should. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonBlue 1049 Posted January 16, 2024 Share Posted January 16, 2024 Seems Everton and Forest are guilty and have admitted as such and its the punishment that is being debated. The key thing is are we guilty or innocent? This from a good city source "Prestwich_Blue" on our forum sums it up nicely.... It's actually two offences when you break it all down. We used artificially inflated sponsorship agreements to overstate our revenue, which led to us knowingly filing incorrect accounts. We didn't declare payments made to Mancini, via the Al Jazira contract, and to players, via the Fordham image rights arrangements. That's it. The rest is just window dressing You'd think that point 1 would be quite easy to prove/disprove. Obviously City can only provide City's paperwork but can't force a Sponsor to provide anything. Still that should be enough? Remember it's up to the Premier league to prove their case first and foremost. CAS looked at some of that for the UEFA case and said there was nothing suspicious. The Mancini payments whilst suspicious as they were between him for a couple of million with an Abu Dhabi club for consultancy pre joining City. Nothing techinically wrong but i guess we'll see. The Fordham image rights payments i have no idea about. As far as i'm aware there is no damning evidence out in the public domain. So not quite sure why the court of public opinion has us guilty. For any thinking that CAS still left a non-cooperation fine on City, it's simple; we cooperated fully up until UEFA leaked confidential information about our business and then we stopped cooperating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonBlue 1049 Posted January 16, 2024 Share Posted January 16, 2024 On 16/01/2024 at 12:22, Isegrim said: They probably will get away because of lapse of time for those charges they are found guilty of. Expand Man City haven't been found guilty of anything as yet. Many think that their is no time limit on the charges. Although Clubs have to operate under English Law so if the PL ignore that it gives us the opportunity to take it to the courts. Also the PL haven't suggested fraud (i know you didnt either) as that would imply a criminal offence and again give us recourse to the courts.. We won't challenge FFP itself (imo). But we will defend ourselves by putting our "army of lawyers" up against the PL's "army of lawyers". Both sides can afford the very best btw, not just us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holden McGroin 7823 Posted January 16, 2024 Share Posted January 16, 2024 On 16/01/2024 at 13:01, LondonBlue said: Seems Everton and Forest are guilty and have admitted as such and its the punishment that is being debated. The key thing is are we guilty or innocent? This from a good city source "Prestwich_Blue" on our forum sums it up nicely.... It's actually two offences when you break it all down. We used artificially inflated sponsorship agreements to overstate our revenue, which led to us knowingly filing incorrect accounts. We didn't declare payments made to Mancini, via the Al Jazira contract, and to players, via the Fordham image rights arrangements. That's it. The rest is just window dressing You'd think that point 1 would be quite easy to prove/disprove. Obviously City can only provide City's paperwork but can't force a Sponsor to provide anything. Still that should be enough? Remember it's up to the Premier league to prove their case first and foremost. CAS looked at some of that for the UEFA case and said there was nothing suspicious. The Mancini payments whilst suspicious as they were between him for a couple of million with an Abu Dhabi club for consultancy pre joining City. Nothing techinically wrong but i guess we'll see. The Fordham image rights payments i have no idea about. As far as i'm aware there is no damning evidence out in the public domain. So not quite sure why the court of public opinion has us guilty. For any thinking that CAS still left a non-cooperation fine on City, it's simple; we cooperated fully up until UEFA leaked confidential information about our business and then we stopped cooperating. Expand It seems pretty simple when breaking it down like that, so what's the hold up? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzler 12449 Posted January 16, 2024 Share Posted January 16, 2024 On 16/01/2024 at 13:21, Holden McGroin said: It seems pretty simple when breaking it down like that, so what's the hold up? Expand They are trying to figure out a way for Man City to get a slap on the wrist whilst also protecting themselves from a dry bumming, legally speaking, from Everton. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 23566 Posted January 16, 2024 Share Posted January 16, 2024 On 16/01/2024 at 13:21, Holden McGroin said: It seems pretty simple when breaking it down like that, so what's the hold up? Expand 115 different charges that take time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonBlue 1049 Posted January 16, 2024 Share Posted January 16, 2024 Big Tony Soprano has us covered. Everton and that glass house of theirs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LondonBlue 1049 Posted January 16, 2024 Share Posted January 16, 2024 On 16/01/2024 at 14:04, wykikitoon said: 115 different charges that take time. Expand There were leaks before Christmas that it would be November 2024. No idea if thats correct though tbf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 23566 Posted January 16, 2024 Share Posted January 16, 2024 *phew* That's the midfield bolstered 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzler 12449 Posted January 16, 2024 Share Posted January 16, 2024 "he's like a new signing" *shudders thinking about the Pardew days* 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 24298 Posted January 16, 2024 Share Posted January 16, 2024 So can't remember who, think it might have been Shay Given, that made the point a natural outcome of FFP is that clubs will have to sell their home grown talent, which I guess is true. How does that fit into clubs representing their local communities? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzler 12449 Posted January 16, 2024 Share Posted January 16, 2024 On 16/01/2024 at 14:45, Renton said: So can't remember who, think it might have been Shay Given, that made the point a natural outcome of FFP is that clubs will have to sell their home grown talent, which I guess is true. How does that fit into clubs representing their local communities? Expand You can also do what Man City and Chelsea do, which is buy talented youngsters from overseas that cost buttons. Develop them knowing they are unlikely to ever play for the club and then sell them on for inflated fees because you have the best youth set ups so everyone just assumes the kids are class. I think the profit is the key measure (stand to be corrected) - So selling Longstaff for £20m would be more favourable than selling Isak for say £75m as it is pure profit of £20m and we'd only get £15m of profit selling Isak for £75m since we paid £60m for him. That's my limited understanding of it like and it could be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holden McGroin 7823 Posted January 16, 2024 Share Posted January 16, 2024 On 16/01/2024 at 15:51, Dazzler said: You can also do what Man City and Chelsea do, which is buy talented youngsters from overseas that cost buttons. Develop them knowing they are unlikely to ever play for the club and then sell them on for inflated fees because you have the best youth set ups so everyone just assumes the kids are class. I think the profit is the key measure (stand to be corrected) - So selling Longstaff for £20m would be more favourable than selling Isak for say £75m as it is pure profit of £20m and we'd only get £15m of profit selling Isak for £75m since we paid £60m for him. That's my limited understanding of it like and it could be wrong. Expand Arent you accountant? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 24091 Posted January 16, 2024 Share Posted January 16, 2024 On 16/01/2024 at 16:08, Holden McGroin said: Arent you a so-called accountant? Expand LM’d your post 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzler 12449 Posted January 16, 2024 Share Posted January 16, 2024 On 16/01/2024 at 16:08, Holden McGroin said: Arent you accountant? Expand Aye but not for a fucking footy club and I don't have the patience or inclination to start looking at the ins and outs of FFP - I have limited storage space in my head and I am getting dangerously close to forgetting how to fasten shoelaces if I start fucking about with a new skill. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 11379 Posted January 16, 2024 Share Posted January 16, 2024 On 16/01/2024 at 13:01, LondonBlue said: So not quite sure why the court of public opinion has us guilty. Expand Surely it's simply that you're successful? Nobody gives a shit about Reading's dodgy owners because who gives a fuck about Reading? People care about our sponsorship deals because we're a threat. The top 6 don't want another force to deal with, the chasing pack don't want another valuable European spot sewn up, and the rest don't want another pair of fixtures written off before a ball is kicked. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 11379 Posted January 16, 2024 Share Posted January 16, 2024 On 16/01/2024 at 15:51, Dazzler said: You can also do what Man City and Chelsea do, which is buy talented youngsters from overseas that cost buttons. Develop them knowing they are unlikely to ever play for the club and then sell them on for inflated fees because you have the best youth set ups so everyone just assumes the kids are class. I think the profit is the key measure (stand to be corrected) - So selling Longstaff for £20m would be more favourable than selling Isak for say £75m as it is pure profit of £20m and we'd only get £15m of profit selling Isak for £75m since we paid £60m for him. That's my limited understanding of it like and it could be wrong. Expand Pretty much, Kane and Rice counted as pure profit as there is no fee to amortise. In FFP terms they cost nothing. So say we had two bids of €50m, one for Bruno, one for Barnes. The Bruno deal would be better in FFP terms than the Harvey Barnes one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now