sammynb 3355 Posted April 11, 2022 Share Posted April 11, 2022 19 minutes ago, PaddockLad said: If your arm, leg or foot is currently viewed as offside that should be onside. The 90s guidance of daylight was spot on..The current guidance of the big toe of your right foot etc is fuckin bollocks and completely against the spirit of the rules as they were when they were established. Again, the guidance has been changed to suit the technology available nowadays. It's blatant fuckin nonsense. Plus the problem with the current tech is it is the VAR referee who is judging when the ball contact actually takes place, a thousandth of a second either way and their call can be wrong. BTW I believe the VAR cameras are 100 frames/second, so the margin is even wider for mistake. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4748 Posted April 11, 2022 Share Posted April 11, 2022 21 minutes ago, PaddockLad said: If your arm, leg or foot is currently viewed as offside that should be onside. The 90s guidance of daylight was spot on..The current guidance of the big toe of your right foot etc is fuckin bollocks and completely against the spirit of the rules as they were when they were established. Again, the guidance has been changed to suit the technology available nowadays. It's blatant fuckin nonsense. I don't disagree, I'd love for the rule to favour attackers more but do you not then just transpose the problem back a foot or so? Now the rules have to quibble over a toe or whatever, if you change it to daylight, does less than a toes worth of daylight count? The problem with the spirit of the rules is that the teams lost that concept decades ago, they can't afford to have spirit anymore and the rules and officials are the same. It's impossible to be "sort of" offside, the way the rule is written you're either on or your off and it doesn't (and shouldnt?) matter by how much, its a yes or no without a maybe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 17261 Posted April 11, 2022 Share Posted April 11, 2022 3 minutes ago, sammynb said: Plus the problem with the current tech is it is the VAR referee who is judging when the ball contact actually takes place, a thousandth of a second either way and their call can be wrong. BTW I believe the VAR cameras are 100 frames/second, so the margin is even wider for mistake. Yeah the ref/linesman on the pitch see it in real time but the principle that the VAR goon can slow it down to 1/1000 of a second is a sick joke. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 17261 Posted April 11, 2022 Share Posted April 11, 2022 4 minutes ago, Andrew said: I don't disagree, I'd love for the rule to favour attackers more but do you not then just transpose the problem back a foot or so? Now the rules have to quibble over a toe or whatever, if you change it to daylight, does less than a toes worth of daylight count? The problem with the spirit of the rules is that the teams lost that concept decades ago, they can't afford to have spirit anymore and the rules and officials are the same. It's impossible to be "sort of" offside, the way the rule is written you're either on or your off and it doesn't (and shouldnt?) matter by how much, its a yes or no without a maybe. Whole body daylight, ie a clear view between all parts of the attackers body and the last defender? .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 20143 Posted April 11, 2022 Share Posted April 11, 2022 How is it dealt out of the Prem? They always seem to be more sensible and less chip on the shoulder than the inventors of the sport Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10857 Posted April 11, 2022 Share Posted April 11, 2022 33 minutes ago, PaddockLad said: Whole body daylight, ie a clear view between all parts of the attackers body and the last defender? .... The issue with that comes with when the shot is taken. Defender's leading foot and attackers trailing foot are slightly overlapping, therefore no daylight. I think Gemmil is right, outside the box, the lines have to be thick and drawn from feet. Inside the box, it's any body part you can legally score from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig 6682 Posted April 11, 2022 Share Posted April 11, 2022 Level is onside so I support the view there should be clear daylight between the attacker and last defender for it to be offside. People will no doubt harp on that it penalises the defenders but they'll just have to adapt to deal with it. Most of us watched football pre-1992 when backpasses were permitted. I watched an old clip on YouTube the other day and saw it happen - looked fucking alien but the game adapted quite quickly. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 17261 Posted April 11, 2022 Share Posted April 11, 2022 1 hour ago, The Fish said: The issue with that comes with when the shot is taken. Defender's leading foot and attackers trailing foot are slightly overlapping, therefore no daylight. I think Gemmil is right, outside the box, the lines have to be thick and drawn from feet. Inside the box, it's any body part you can legally score from. In the scenario you're painting there the attacker is onside. It's a lot more black and white and in keeping with the spirit of the rules. The attackers entire body would need to be offside, not just his toe . Then there's no need for different zones or any other fuckin old pony... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spongebob toonpants 3996 Posted April 11, 2022 Share Posted April 11, 2022 I'd keep it even simpler and judge it simply on where the feet are. If any part of the foot is level onside. Daylight between the feet and you're offside Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4748 Posted April 11, 2022 Share Posted April 11, 2022 So a millimetre of daylight between attacker and defender being offside is better than a millimetre of an attackers body being past the last defender? I mean...it is because it provides more advantage to attacking teams, but we're still talking measuring millimetres either way which is the irritating part of all of this isn't it? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 35082 Posted April 12, 2022 Share Posted April 12, 2022 (edited) If you can’t definitively say there’s been an error within a short period of time. Say, 30 seconds. Then the on field decision should stand. If the officials need to spend ages looking at whether someone was just on or off by looking at which frame the ball was actually passed in then it’s too indefinite to make a decision Edited April 12, 2022 by Alex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4748 Posted April 12, 2022 Share Posted April 12, 2022 Amazing game being played out by Real Madrid and Chelsea here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30610 Posted April 12, 2022 Share Posted April 12, 2022 I doubt Unai Emery is regretting his decision right now. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44880 Posted April 12, 2022 Share Posted April 12, 2022 3 minutes ago, ewerk said: I doubt Unai Emery is regretting his decision right now. Yep he's had a very GOOD EBENING. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 17261 Posted April 12, 2022 Share Posted April 12, 2022 FUCKIN TAKE THAT YOU FUCKIN COCKNEY CUNTS 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 33209 Posted April 12, 2022 Share Posted April 12, 2022 5 minutes ago, PaddockLad said: FUCKIN TAKE THAT YOU FUCKIN COCKNEY CUNTS I'm not watching it but a young'un at work was on his phone and was quite excited about Chelsea winning. I don't think he supports them. Obviously I was....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30610 Posted April 12, 2022 Share Posted April 12, 2022 I can’t believe how many seats they’ve left to install at the Bernabeu. Surely there’s a faster way to do it? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 17261 Posted April 12, 2022 Share Posted April 12, 2022 3 minutes ago, Howmanheyman said: I'm not watching it but a young'un at work was on his phone and was quite excited about Chelsea winning. I don't think he supports them. Obviously I was....... Its been a great game but frankly fuck Chelsea, they’re all cunts 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 33209 Posted April 12, 2022 Share Posted April 12, 2022 (edited) Anyone know who this ex-pro is? (It's not Billy Connolly). Edited April 12, 2022 by Howmanheyman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougle 3329 Posted April 12, 2022 Share Posted April 12, 2022 28 minutes ago, Howmanheyman said: Anyone know who this ex-pro is? (It's not Billy Connolly). Jimmy Bullard? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 33209 Posted April 12, 2022 Share Posted April 12, 2022 53 minutes ago, Dougle said: Jimmy Bullard? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohhh_yeah 2965 Posted April 13, 2022 Share Posted April 13, 2022 2 hours ago, Howmanheyman said: Anyone know who this ex-pro is? (It's not Billy Connolly). Brian "Choccy" McClair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 33209 Posted April 13, 2022 Share Posted April 13, 2022 2 minutes ago, ohhh_yeah said: Brian "Choccy" McClair. Eranu!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobinRobin 11270 Posted April 13, 2022 Share Posted April 13, 2022 That's what happens with Bryan Robson as captain 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21923 Posted April 13, 2022 Share Posted April 13, 2022 Jesus, like killer Kilcline on a bad day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now