Gemmill 45984 Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 Bullshit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 31190 Posted February 28, 2020 Share Posted February 28, 2020 https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/swimming/51670931 Not so cocky now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 20699 Posted February 28, 2020 Author Share Posted February 28, 2020 Should have had Armitstead's lawyer. She missed 3 and got off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 31190 Posted February 28, 2020 Share Posted February 28, 2020 She probably hadn't smashed up the samples with a hammer though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wykikitoon 20699 Posted February 28, 2020 Author Share Posted February 28, 2020 No, she just didn't hear the door bell a couple of times. 3 missed tests and its an ADV. But the same lawyer was the one that got the Dawg off when he had an AAF in his bio-passport by handing in an 80k document to WADA on the eve of the TDF. The bulk of it was about the study of too much salbutomol given to dogs. Yep and WADA dropped the case as they couldn't afford to defend it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15716 Posted February 28, 2020 Share Posted February 28, 2020 12 minutes ago, wykikitoon said: No, she just didn't hear the door bell a couple of times. I know you hate women but I think you might need to look a bit harder at this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 7165 Posted February 29, 2020 Share Posted February 29, 2020 So on the Mo thing. If he’s taken something to enhance his stamina or whatever, and it isn’t illegal, what’s the issue? If it isn’t illegal the anyone else could be using it too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 35566 Posted February 29, 2020 Share Posted February 29, 2020 1 hour ago, Kid Dynamite said: So on the Mo thing. If he’s taken something to enhance his stamina or whatever, and it isn’t illegal, what’s the issue? If it isn’t illegal the anyone else could be using it too? See Gemmill’s previous point. If he hasn’t been up to stuff, the denial and subsequent retraction doesn’t make a lot of sense. I.e. it seems like the actions of someone who has something to hide, even if this particular incident isn’t damning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now