Park Life 71 Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 (edited) Logan. 7.6/10 Didn't quite deliver but was a very good alternative X-Men film. The chemistry between him and his daughter was well done by Mangold. Edited March 3, 2017 by Park Life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 11119 Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 Logan. 7.6/10 Didn't quite deliver but was a very good alternative X-Men film. The chemistry between him and his daughter was well done by Mangold. That's about 5 higher than I was expecting from you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Kelly 1307 Posted March 4, 2017 Share Posted March 4, 2017 Enjoyed Logan. I think anyone expecting a regular x men type film will be disappointed but for me it was exactly what I wanted from a Wolverine film. Good to see with the likes of this and Deadpool, Marvel can offer something different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted March 4, 2017 Share Posted March 4, 2017 Enjoyed Logan. I think anyone expecting a regular x men type film will be disappointed but for me it was exactly what I wanted from a Wolverine film. Good to see with the likes of this and Deadpool, Marvel can offer something different. It had a beautiful balance to it and Mangold IMO created a backdrop of melancholy that permeated right into the fight scenes that gave them more meaning. There was also this Western motif of the retired gunslinger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Kelly 1307 Posted March 4, 2017 Share Posted March 4, 2017 It had a beautiful balance to it and Mangold IMO created a backdrop of melancholy that permeated right into the fight scenes that gave them more meaning. There was also this Western motif of the retired gunslinger.Yeah that was exactly what I thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4983 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Logan - A bit disappointed really, would probably score it around where parky did but after hearing about how great it is from elsewhere it didn't stand up to the hype. Excellent performances from Jackman, Stewart and the kid but the fighting got boring after the first couple, the villains were dull, southern guy, exposition man(who threatened to be interesting for about 10 seconds at one point) and the symbolic muscle. Didn't care about any of them in the slightest by the end of it. How early on did everyone else know exactly what would happen to that nice family with the horses and stuff? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holden McGroin 7031 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 I thought the Southern guy was good. Thats the bloke from Narcos. Richard E Grant wasnt too menacing though. I was expecting a masterpiece but there were definite flaws, although it was very well done and very different from the normal superhero movies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holden McGroin 7031 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Hell or High Water. - Good start but I lost interest. Never a good sign Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Hell or High Water. - Good start but I lost interest. Never a good sign Yeah found it a bit flat. 6.1/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 35988 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 I thought it rated about 6.3/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 I thought it rated about 6.3/10 I start with a base score of 5 if I like a film and a base score of 3 if I didn't then add points for dir, camera, performances, script etc...It's propa scientific. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 35988 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 I just find the decimal points a tad OTT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 7355 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 6/10 Crap 7/10 Alreet 8/10 Good 9/10 Mint 10/10 Proper Mint Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 22756 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 6/10 can't be crap man. That's a solid score 1/10 - unwatchable 2/10 - painful 3/10 - awful 4/10 - poor 5/10 - fair 6/10 - watchable 7/10 - good 8/10 - "great" 9/10 - mint 10/10 - unmissable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 5607 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 I feel like around 2 or 3 you should have 'so bad it's good' though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 7355 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 6/10 can't be crap man. That's a solid score 1/10 - unwatchable 2/10 - painful 3/10 - awful 4/10 - poor 5/10 - fair 6/10 - watchable 7/10 - good 8/10 - "great" 9/10 - mint 10/10 - unmissable I was taking the piss. It's the same with footballer ratings, most of them end up with 7/10, 6/10 if they had a crap game, 8/10 a good game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 35988 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 ***** Excellent, do not miss **** Well worth watching *** Flawed but interesting ** Some redeeming features * Absymal Five stars to anyone who remembers where that's from Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15897 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Pretty sure that's where I learned several of those words! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 35988 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Pretty sure that's where I learned several of those words! Yeah, me too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 I just find the decimal points a tad OTT When you're continually curating your personal top 100 the decimal points come into play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 ***** Excellent, do not miss **** Well worth watching *** Flawed but interesting ** Some redeeming features * Absymal Five stars to anyone who remembers where that's from Time Out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 35988 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 When you're continually curating your personal top 100 the decimal points come into play. Just score them out of 100, since that's what you're effectively doing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 35988 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Time Out? The TV section of The Evening Chronicle back in the day when it was a broadsheet and it (or at least the TV critic) still had pretensions of it being a quality newspaper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Just score them out of 100, since that's what you're effectively doing 100/100 - Perfect 93/100 - Almost perfect 4/5 - Excellent Pi/5 - good e/5 - slightly above average 19/50 - Poor 7/25 - awful 1/L - Unfathomably bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 The TV section of The Evening Chronicle back in the day when it was a broadsheet and it (or at least the TV critic) still had pretensions of it being a quality newspaper. Misplaced pretensions with such absymal spelling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now