Jump to content

Film/moving picture show you most recently watched


Jimbo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Watched Elysium on the plane on Saturday - good idea but ultimately disappointing - I'm starting to recognise the traits that Matt Damon exhibits in all his roles confirming my overall view that very few "actors" act - they just portray themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 31/03/2014 at 14:43, Howay said:

Yeah, it looked bizarre at times but it all worked really well. The uses of 'bad' CGI worked great as well. I'll definitely be giving it another watch sometime, especially as I missed Bill Murray's cameo. Shame it's not out down there, it luckily has a run at a cinema right next to me as the closest one after that is a good hour or so drive away.

Those videos are interesting Happy Face, he definitely uses both those shots extensively in Grand Budapest Hotel, of course the videos have some examples from the trailer but there are a lot of shots of Ralph Fiennes character and his friend Zero's faces close up and centered. Beautiful film.

 

The 'bad' cgi was implemented to great effect. Made everything look even more dolls housey than his usual films. Love Wes Anderson, glad that Grand Budapest is doing so well as it's a terrific film. Fiennes is a superb actor.

 

Cap'n 'Murica - The Winter Soldier

 

Enjoyed this one. Better than the first CapAM film, and the whole omniscient surveillance theme was an interesting one to go with. I agree with Kermode though - they should've gone a bit further with it, given the film clocked in at over 2 hours. The first end credit scene

  Reveal hidden contents
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched Cap2, wish I'd watched it in 2D mind.

 

It was good, but as you say Thor and Iron Man "own" the scenes they're in, but Steve Rogers' Cap doesn't have the same presence, other than when he's being a bit badass. He should be played like a firebrand general portrayed by Willis or similar; the guy is supposed to be 90.

 

Oh and Marvel's Quicklsilver (on the right)

avengers-2-scarlet-witch-quicksilver-set

Unlike Sony's version that looks like "The cutesy androgynous nerdy one" from a teenager's favourite boy band

x-men-quicksilver-days-future-past-empir

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually think Ryan Reynolds is a decent fit for Deadpool, but only if it's rated R and only if it's a Marvel film, not a Sony one.

 

Also, Hugh Jackman is a good Wolverine in the 1st film (and the cameo in First Class), but he's softened too much in later movies. It's the story and the scripts that've let them both down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 01/04/2014 at 18:55, The Fish said:

Actually think Ryan Reynolds is a decent fit for Deadpool, but only if it's rated R and only if it's a Marvel film, not a Sony one.

 

You cut that shit out right now, Dave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 01/04/2014 at 21:53, Brock Manson said:

 

You cut that shit out right now, Dave.

 

Who's a better fit for Deadpool?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 01/04/2014 at 22:52, The Fish said:

 

Who's a better fit for Deadpool?

There's only one Dirty Harry ;)

 

( I did not know Clint turned down the Bond role , offered to him after Connery, as he thought it should be an English actor's role

Would've been great.

" The name's ..... I have no name" :D )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw Captain America 2 last night. Think it's my favourite of the Marvel films, which is surprising as there's not a lot of attraction to the character. Much better than the first which kind of fell apart in the second half, some unnecessary commitments they made in that were thankfully only minor distractions here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 02/04/2014 at 06:57, Ant said:

Reynolds was grand as deadpool, the script/movie itself was god awful

Yup.

 

FOX owns the rights to Deadpool as part of their X-Men deal and they've not got a movie right yet, imo. So I'm hoping that when they lose the rights, Marvel/Disney pick it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Man of Steel

 

I re-read the reviews from this thread and general agree that the proper "drama" bits were better than the cgi.

 

Would rather have had a full film on that and save a fuller war with Zod for another film which I think is what Fish suggested.

 

Still can't see how a fight against Batman can be fair one like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  NJS said:

Still can't see how a fight against Batman can be fair one like.

I think the closest they will get will be as with Dark Knight Returns, though I doubt it will be done as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 19/04/2014 at 19:22, NJS said:

Man of Steel

 

I re-read the reviews from this thread and general agree that the proper "drama" bits were better than the cgi.

 

Would rather have had a full film on that and save a fuller war with Zod for another film which I think is what Fish suggested.

 

Still can't see how a fight against Batman can be fair one like.

 

 

  On 20/04/2014 at 03:25, OTF said:

I think the closest they will get will be as with Dark Knight Returns, though I doubt it will be done as well.

:aye:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 20/04/2014 at 09:25, Christmas Tree said:

Frozen 10/10

 

Simply superb. Disney at its campest.

 

FYP

 

;)

 

It was all right to be fair, but

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 20/04/2014 at 23:00, Monroe Transfer said:

DIdn't you just waste 90 minutes of your life watching NUFC?

Aye but atleast I was able to appreciate it for the shower of shit i knew it would be. I was also close enough to Pardew for him to overhear my abuse without directing it at him in an overly aggressive gonna get thrown out kind of way. :picknose:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 22/04/2014 at 20:27, TheRollingStones said:

Spider-Man 2. Pretty poor, far too much cgi, some of the worst one liners on recent memory and a thoroughly miserable ending. Jamie Foxx is the baddie too which was a strange choice

 

 

Also just seen TASM2.

 

Overall I enjoyed it - good movie for someone who was a major fan of TASM cartoon from the 90s. Riddled with annoying bits and moments that add nothing to the film.

 

Can see the split over Garfield's spidey, but he's a good fit for the role. The one-liners come as a part of the character, although by the end I was going mad at hearing the spiderman themesong.

 

Good bits: 1)

  Reveal hidden contents

 

2) Andrew Garfield and Dane DeHaan both turned in sound performances. Like DeHaan a lot, took to the Harry Osbourne character well. They rushed his descent into villainy though.

 

3) End credit scene. Jennifer Lawrence as Mystique will be one to watch. Not sure what movie this will be though?

 

Bad bits:

 

1) Fuck off with shite cgi. The truck chase scene added nothing but to lazily introduce a character. Leads to...

 

2) Fuck off with this Rhino. I appreciate transfering the comic version to the screen is difficult, but some nobend poorly-acted-stereotypical russian baddie blatantly being shoehorned in to the upcoming Sinister Six film didn;t work at all.

 

3)

  Reveal hidden contents

 

4) Didn’t buy Jamie Foxx as a quiet, social outcast. I didn’t mind the adaptation of Electro otherwise.

 

Miles better than the first one, but it’s gutting that they couldn’t have let the license go so that we could’ve had Spiderman in the Avengers. Would’ve really been something special.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.