Newcastle United: Club Sold To PCP - Official

[Dr Gloom 23453]

 

[Kid Dynamite 7568]

22 minutes ago, wykikitoon said:

 

 

As you wish Jamie

 

 

 

 

Edited November 21, 2023 by Kid Dynamite

[wykikitoon 22622]

Mane on loan 🤔

[Dr Gloom 23453]

8 minutes ago, wykikitoon said:

Mane on loan 🤔

mahrez 

[wykikitoon 22622]

2 minutes ago, Dr Gloom said:

mahrez 

Both 

[Tdansmith 3260]

12 minutes ago, wykikitoon said:

Mane on loan 🤔

 

4 minutes ago, Dr Gloom said:

mahrez 

 

Milinkovic-Savic

Veiga

Fofana

[Dr Gloom 23453]

Just now, wykikitoon said:

Both 

We’re allowed four international loans so we could get

 

Neves

Mahrez

Benzama

 

Then I’d be tempted by that Viega kid who we were linked with previously, as he sounds like the real deal.

 

But Henderson, just for the Mackem meltdown, would be first class shithousing

[Dr Gloom 23453]

1 minute ago, Tdansmith said:

 

 

Milinkovic-Savic

 

Forgot about him. He’d do too!

[ewerk 32954]

1 hour ago, wykikitoon said:

Carragher fewming has me harder than teak. The utter cunt. 

Wyki sitting at home, hate scrolling:

 

[Howmanheyman 36298]

1 hour ago, wykikitoon said:

 

 

 

 

[thebrokendoll 10209]

the arrogance of these cunts is staggering. they've been prepared to do literally anything to ensure their status at the top table, to make sure there isn't a fair competition.

loving this me, I despise the cunts....

 

[Monkeys Fist 44955]

45 minutes ago, ewerk said:

Wyki sitting at home, hate scrolling:

 

Tonight Matthew, I’m going to be Wykiki 

 

[OTF 8322]

1 hour ago, thebrokendoll said:

the arrogance of these cunts is staggering. they've been prepared to do literally anything to ensure their status at the top table, to make sure there isn't a fair competition.

loving this me, I despise the cunts....

 

 

I don't know what is more hilarious;

- The fact that they don't understand that they need the premier league much more than the premier league needs them

- The fact that they think it's a good idea in any capacity

- That they think other 'big' clubs would join them on such a foolish endeavour

- Them believing that the EFL would welcome them with open arms, despite them spending ridiculously more than any other club at that level

- That they believe their players would have no issue with droppping down several leagues and missing out on European football/the potential for it just to try to make a petulant point

- That they have observed what we have done and still consider us to be rogue spenders

 

I'll have to settle on their general level of delusion.

 

1. Manchester United – £200,996,000
2. Manchester City – £192,712,000
3. Arsenal – £155,896,000
4. Liverpool – £134,940,000
5. Chelsea – £128,804,000
6. Aston Villa – £99,840,000
7. Tottenham – £91,000,000
8. West Ham United – £90,480,000
9. Newcastle United – £85,800,000
10. Everton – £74,662,000
11. Nottingham Forest – £59,050,000
12. Crystal Palace – £52,150,000
13. Bournemouth – £48,594,000
14. Fulham – £47,580,000
15. Brighton – £47,268,000
16. Wolves – £41,600,000
17. Brentford – £34,398,000
18. Burnley – £20,978,000
19. Sheffield United – £13,302,800
20. Luton Town – £3,662,000

 

"rouge spenders"

"fair competition"

[RobinRobin 12389]

15 hours ago, Monkeys Fist said:

The replies to that first tweet are giving me a raging boner. 

[toonotl 3399]

19 hours ago, PaddockLad said:

We’re not in for Neves after all….the timing seems, how can I put this, “interesting”

 

 

 

[Dazzler 11594]

7 hours ago, thebrokendoll said:

the arrogance of these cunts is staggering. they've been prepared to do literally anything to ensure their status at the top table, to make sure there isn't a fair competition.

loving this me, I despise the cunts....

 

Rogue spenders

 

We're talking about inter-related loans, they most likely be free, the daft cunt.

[Howay 12496]

 They’re angry at things we’ve not even done. None of this stuff bothered them until our takeover, in fact all of their clubs took advantage of a lot of the loopholes they’re now all adamant need to be closed.
 

I had an argument with a Liverpool fan recently about the related party advertising, of course his stance was they do no wrong and the links between New Balance & Warrior (two brands that previously had zero involvement in the sport) didn’t exist  aye huge coincidence they both originate from Boston just like the Liverpool owners hub. We’ve seen these things for fucking donkeys years, King power stadium, all the Ashley crap, etc but none of them give a single fuck until our takeover. 

[Alex 36591]

I also like the way there’s loads of people arguing that NOT voting to change the rules is corruption, cheating etc. How the fuck does that work exactly? Whereas a temporary rule change cooked up by the likes of Liverpool and Arsenal, specifically targeting one club / a direct rival is all perfectly above board? 

[thebrokendoll 10209]

just off the top of me head and without any inclination to look up the correct timeline, lfc ...

 

demanded bigger share of tv money,

demanded more than 1 vote in polls,

creation of the e.s.l.

demanded automatic qualification to european competition based on coefficients rather than league placings.

demanded the right to vote against relegation should one of the 6 finish in the bottom 3

 

obviously none of this is remotely to do with greed, anti-competitive or self-entitlement.

it's just down to them being the guardians of sporting morality.

 

[Holden McGroin 7496]

On a slightly different topic....We must have made a hell of a lot from TV appearance deals this year. I think Burnley, West Ham and Palace are the only games not televised so far ?

Edited November 22, 2023 by Holden McGroin

[ewerk 32954]

I'm surprised the match against Chelsea isn't on TV.

[Holden McGroin 7496]

Yeah, unusual.

 

Still, 9 of our next 12 are televised.

[The Fish 11312]

10 minutes ago, Holden McGroin said:

Yeah, unusual.

 

Still, 9 of our next 12 are televised.

Magedia

[Howay 12496]

1 hour ago, Alex said:

I also like the way there’s loads of people arguing that NOT voting to change the rules is corruption, cheating etc. How the fuck does that work exactly? Whereas a temporary rule change cooked up by the likes of Liverpool and Arsenal, specifically targeting one club / a direct rival is all perfectly above board? 

These points are exactly why I completely disagree with any point fans are making for why those against the rule are corrupt. It’s a temporary ban, so rushed through to block just this upcoming window - even if they really do want this why can’t it wait to be properly laid out? How many rules are temporarily brought in mid season? Additionally the block on only incoming transfers - why? Surely if you’re actually opposing the multi club model you’d want both banned. It’s absolutely an attack on one club - Ashworth brought it up to draw them out imo, it’s unlikely we even planned on doing it but it’s further exposing their antics. 

[wykikitoon 22622]

All the heads are all about us being able to loan too.  Like it's just for us.