Kitman 2204 Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 One was too many 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21869 Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 edited Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 32918 Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 Oliver was 'Wide of the mark', John Gibson was 'Straight from the shoulder and now Lee Ryder is 'The man that launched a 1,000 parodies'. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21869 Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 Lee “Geordie foot soldier, delivering scoops to his loyal puntaz” Ryder 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14011 Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 CANS ON THE BACK OF THE BUS 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Hermione 13842 Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 This is the Fop argument of football takeovers. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14011 Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 RIP FOP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christmas Tree 4715 Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 8-0 thrashing of SW YouTube 3pm Saturday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21869 Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 That’ll be a nice way to toast the takeover Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polarboy 2311 Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 (edited) Kieran Maguire the football finance expert has weighed in on this, probably non-issue, of piracy being linked to Saudi. He basically said that there isn't any clear evidence linking the two parties, and that even if there are suspicions, it would make more sense for the premier league to give approval in order to get the Saudi's to bid for the rights and stop any piracy. https://www.nufcblog.com/2020/05/13/football-finance-lecturer-weighs-in-on-nufc-takeover/ Edited May 13, 2020 by Polarboy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trooper 940 Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 The latest from .com Take Over Latest Thanks to everyone who has been in touch regarding our recent takeover update: Attempts to make sense of what is currently going on have resulted in nothing meaningful - although there's certainly substance to claims that other PL clubs aren't happy with the proposed deal. Whether that opposition in itself is enough to halt or derail the proposed purchase is another big unknown at this point. As a consequence, we're unable to say whether it's more or less likely to happen and the timescale for finding out - one way or the other - is a matter of guesswork. Clear as mud basically Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougle 3322 Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/52651771 Like a dog with a bone..... Third article by good old Aunty pushing the same agenda 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 34954 Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Dougle said: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/52651771 Like a dog with a bone..... Third article by good old Aunty pushing the same agenda It’s like they’ve serialised one ordinary sized interview as several instalments Nowt against her, obviously, and she clearly has grounds for her opposition to the Saudi regime, but why are they flogging this like a dead horse? As I’ve mentioned before, why isn’t her view on Britain’s and the West’s relationship with that regime more pertinent? It’s fucking pathetic journalism Edited May 13, 2020 by Alex 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 34954 Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 10 hours ago, Dr Gloom said: off mark? wide of the mark That suit/face/tie/way the tie is knotted, man. What a fucking clip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4723 Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 I've read the letter, it basically goes without saying that her accusations against the Saudi regime are fair. Unfortunately its utterly groundless in its relation to Newcastle fans and largely incorrect in regards the wider footballing context too. Claim after claim about being "tempted" by this offer, as if its an offer made directly to fans. We need to THINK about accepting it apparently, as if that impacts anything in this situation. "The rules of the premier league do not allow the Crown Prince to own and control your club." This simply isn't a fact as stated and it remains to be seen whether the PL make that judgement, but that has nothing to do with us either. "Your voice will be so very powerful" Will. It. Fuck. 4 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21869 Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 The fans can’t resist this takeover anymore than the previous one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 34954 Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 Well that’s it as well, if anything the letter should be aimed at the seller, and even then it would be too late. It’s less emotive that way though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougle 3322 Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 (edited) So why do the BBC keep pushing this? A state run broadcasting company. A state that engages very enthusiastically with the Kingdom of Saud quite happily when it comes to weapons etc. Edited May 13, 2020 by Dougle 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howay 12496 Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 I also don’t understand all these journalists running stories about rival PL clubs opposing it. They surely cannot have any say, otherwise you’re allowing them to have a say in the future and ability of a direct rival. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew 4723 Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 7 minutes ago, Howay said: I also don’t understand all these journalists running stories about rival PL clubs opposing it. They surely cannot have any say, otherwise you’re allowing them to have a say in the future and ability of a direct rival. Aye thats a weird one. Surely every competing club doesn't want any other competing club to be taken over by wealthier or more ambitious owners. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 5189 Posted May 13, 2020 Share Posted May 13, 2020 There is surely no way that any PL club can possibly block this deal on the grounds of just being scared of the financial muscle. The only basis they'd have would be the piracy issue even if it's just a smoke screen. I still don't see how this doesn't go through really - even if there was something in the piracy stuff, how can the Premier League make that judgement outside of proper legal channels? Why would it risk that? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howay 12496 Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 Aye, I also don’t see how blocking it on those grounds would help their cause. If anything, if it was true, they’d double down on it. They’d need a pretty solid case to block a deal over a link which the Saudis have successfully disproven in a court, it’s not just the Saudis the PL would burn here they’d be blocking Ashley from £300m which he is likely going to use to buy up SD shares, so I can’t see it being something he’d sit back and accept. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougle 3322 Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 When does logic ever come into an agenda driven thing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howay 12496 Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 6 minutes ago, Dougle said: When does logic ever come into an agenda driven thing? True, I just don’t see how they’d be able to win in court. Saying that them taking their sweet time on this could be them trying to come up with that case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougle 3322 Posted May 14, 2020 Share Posted May 14, 2020 If this can be rejected for any ‘legitimate’ reason it will be. The fat cats at the table do not want another Man City dividing the spoils. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now