Generic small time football blather thread FOREVER

[Meenzer 16404]

1 minute ago, Alex said:

 timed nicely to coincide with their annual mass delusion about not really wanting to be in the top flight anyway 

 

If they were in the top flight, I'm sure they'd refuse our luxury tax contributions to their coffers anyway. Morally superior marra.

[Dazzler 11685]

Also, none of them grasping that the PL rule changes would really only benefit any team not playing in a European competition. The teams in Europe would be bound by UEFAs rules so Man City would not be able to "spend a billion quid" as a number of the tateys on there are going on about.

[PaddockLad 18954]

Just now, Dazzler said:

Also, none of them grasping that the PL rule changes would really only benefit any team not playing in a European competition. The teams in Europe would be bound by UEFAs rules so Man City would not be able to "spend a billion quid" as a number of the tateys on there are going on about.

Yeah but it’s adoption by UEFA would kill the ESL stone dead iyam

 

[PaddockLad 18954]

2 hours ago, Alex said:

Seems a bit too sensible 

The current PL clubs aren’t likely to vote to give Man City and us unlimited spending power unless the penalties are huge, enough to give oil rich despots second thoughts… it’s unlikely to happen iyam 🤷🏻‍♂️

[Dr Gloom 23571]

1 hour ago, Dazzler said:

If the money then goes back into clubs that spend below the agreed limits then it can only help teams like Luton or Sheff Utd too who come up with much smaller budgets too.

 

Teams will still have to comply with UEFA's rules - so the big boys won't be able to take the absolute the piss and teams like us, Villa, Everton etc would be able to spend what we can afford to try and get consistently into Europe.

 

Not sure why the bigger clubs (outside of Chelsea - who need this to get back into Europe) would go along with this though, they'll all be hamstrung by UEFA and it'll allow at least three clubs to close the gap and one of those clubs could afford to close it pretty rapidly.

 

chelsea might as they are surely going to get stung with a point deduction at some point - man city too? 

[Guest MrRaspberryJam]

3 hours ago, PaddockLad said:

Given the opposition to PIF’s takeover I can’t believe they’d vote for this mind…

 

 

Can we make sure Everton are punished by deducting a further 10pts first and THEN bringing this rule into place please?

[Dazzler 11685]

1 minute ago, Dr Gloom said:

 

chelsea might as they are surely going to get stung with a point deduction at some point - man city too? 

Villa look like they are staring a potential PSR issue in the face too so they may be open to it. Forest and Everton will surely vote in favour, as would we.

[Dazzler 11685]

2 minutes ago, MrRaspberryJam said:

Can we make sure Everton are punished by deducting a further 10pts first and THEN bringing this rule into place please?

I don't think it will matter, Everton will be taken over by 777 and they make Mike Ashley look like a sugar daddy

[Gemmill 49729]

A few on here will be rethinking their abuse of him after that latest video, I know that. GSP has got nothing on AP. 

[The Fish 11313]

On 03/04/2024 at 17:10, Alex said:

 

It's pretty funny that as soon as sufficient clubs run foul of the rules by spending too much, the rules are set to change. Kind of makes a mockery of the whole thing.

[Alex 36671]

2 hours ago, PaddockLad said:

The current PL clubs aren’t likely to vote to give Man City and us unlimited spending power unless the penalties are huge, enough to give oil rich despots second thoughts… it’s unlikely to happen iyam 🤷🏻‍♂️

I don’t know. A LOT has changed since the takeover was initially blocked etc. If clubs vote in self interest, rather than the forelock-tugging arse-licking we’ve seen on the past then I think there’s only  Arsenal, Spurs and Liverpool who should be against it. Man Utd too I suppose. But after that? 

Edited April 4, 2024 by Alex

[Ayatollah Hermione 14653]

Every club is sick of this shit tbh. Other than Man City. And the PL have caused so much shit for themselves with points deductions, successful appeals and further questions about just what the fuck is happening with Man City, that this feels like a potential amnesty in waiting.

 

Not to mention the knock on effect of losing the attractiveness of the PRODUCT in overseas markets 

[trophyshy 7308]

3 hours ago, Meenzer said:

 

Marally superior, marra.

Revised. 

[PaddockLad 18954]

Illuminating

 

 

[Dr Gloom 23571]

8 minutes ago, PaddockLad said:

Illuminating

 

 

Eh? How are Real Madrid so low?

[GrahamTaylor5 1172]

37 minutes ago, PaddockLad said:

Illuminating

 

 

Is this all down to teams 'growing' (or finding/stockpiling) youth to sell? I can understand how we are above Spurs but I don't get Liverpool.

[Andrew 5136]

33 minutes ago, Dr Gloom said:

Eh? How are Real Madrid so low?

They are surprisingly good at selling players, and not spending as much as you think a lot of the time, I just went back through a few years of their transfers out of curiosity and they spend a lot of years making profits on players like Alvaro morata

[Howmanheyman 36442]

 

 

 

 

[Dr Gloom 23571]

20 hours ago, PaddockLad said:

Given the opposition to PIF’s takeover I can’t believe they’d vote for this mind…

 

 

 

it's pissing off all the right people 👍

 

 

[Dazzler 11685]

14 minutes ago, Dr Gloom said:

 

it's pissing off all the right people 👍

 

 

Is Delaney still going? He does know that "the most wealthy can keep paying whatever they want" is bollocks, doesn't he? Business is still business, and even the most wealthy investors will (eventually) want a return on their investment. All this rule change will bring about is allowing teams with owners that have the means to invest large sums into their business to grow and succeed can do so, but at a premium - a premium which would then be filtered down to the clubs that don't, benefiting them to an extent too.

 

Also, so long as UEFA don't bow to the pressure of the PL and make it a universal thing then their rules would still apply for European competitions meaning teams like Man City and his beloved Man Utd couldn't "spend what they want".

 

The bloke is the worst kind of idiot.

[ewerk 33111]

It's communism is what it is.

[Howmanheyman 36442]

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Gemmill 49729]

It's fucking true though.

 

I read something just yesterday which almost seemed to suggest that they'd plucked him from obscurity. 

 

So fucking weird. 

[Renton 23596]

This is the SMB's official accountant's take on the luxury tax. I thought their frat kid owner literally relied on money from the bank of Mam?

 

[NJS 4557]

Not an expert on their history but surely most clubs in the "bank of England" era were getting 50/60/70k crowds - did the mackems have a more successful club shop than others? Access to overseas markets? Global tv deals? 

 

I'd guess it was their owners pockets the same as Liverpool in a slightly later era.