Jump to content

Generic small time football blather thread FOREVER


Sonatine
 Share

Recommended Posts

  On 16/08/2023 at 17:37, Chaser said:

Unbelievable to think Man Utd are paving the way for a Greenwood return. I know many have escaped conviction be it not enough evidence, false evidence, victim declining to prosecute etc but from what was put out in the public domain, it would appear that what was alleged was true. 

Expand  


Their investigation should have ended when they heard this below. How they can possibly think of playing him again is beyond me.

 

image.thumb.png.0dee057b1043eba2d5853c1f880a57f7.png

  • Like 1
  • Jaysus... 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know this it's inappropriate to focus on a turn of phrase here, given just how evil that transcript is, but did he really say "Damn me"?  It made him sound like a Victorian era gammon. Maybe he was role playing Stephen Fry as the Duke of Wellington as a rapist...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 16/08/2023 at 20:35, ewerk said:


Their investigation should have ended when they heard this below. How they can possibly think of playing him again is beyond me.

 

image.thumb.png.0dee057b1043eba2d5853c1f880a57f7.png

Expand  

Their angle seems to be how do we justify bringing him back in, rather than weighing up the right thing to do. Basically they dont want to lose their asset.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given that he hasn’t been convicted of anything or banned from football I’m wondering can they sack him? My hunch is that their lawyers have told them that they owe him  back pay from his suspension and will have to pay up his contract to get him to leave.

 

Isn't Mendy looking all his wages from his suspension at Man City? @LondonBlue

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 17/08/2023 at 05:33, ewerk said:

Given that he hasn’t been convicted of anything or banned from football I’m wondering can they sack him? My hunch is that their lawyers have told them that they owe him  back pay from his suspension and will have to pay up his contract to get him to leave.

 

Isn't Mendy looking all his wages from his suspension at Man City? @LondonBlue

Expand  

Youre probably right that they cant sack him,  but they dont have to restore him to the first team squad.  Unless they believe hes innocent ofc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 17/08/2023 at 05:56, Holden McGroin said:

Yeah, tricky one. Legally he hasn’t done anything wrong. 
 

if I was Man United or his agent  I’d loan him abroad. As a player, I’d be uncomfortable if he was coming back into the dressing room.

Expand  


It will be linked to employment law. He's not been found guilty of anything. But if Man Utd can prove he is guilty of gross misconduct with the audio recording then they could still have a case to sack him. I'd imagine he's been on full pay whilst suspended 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 17/08/2023 at 06:30, Kid Dynamite said:


It will be linked to employment law. He's not been found guilty of anything. But if Man Utd can prove he is guilty of gross misconduct with the audio recording then they could still have a case to sack him. I'd imagine he's been on full pay whilst suspended 

Expand  


I would have thought so. But then I thought Mendy was as well.

Edited by Holden McGroin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 17/08/2023 at 05:33, ewerk said:

Given that he hasn’t been convicted of anything or banned from football I’m wondering can they sack him? My hunch is that their lawyers have told them that they owe him  back pay from his suspension and will have to pay up his contract to get him to leave.

 

Isn't Mendy looking all his wages from his suspension at Man City? @LondonBlue

Expand  

 

If it was easy i'd give you a straight forward answer.

 

Pretty sure he left our employ some time ago but now that his case is done, there's a rumour that he's after about 10m from us.

 

There's the violation of bail terms and gross misconduct that work in our favour though.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 17/08/2023 at 06:23, Kitman said:

Youre probably right that they cant sack him,  but they dont have to restore him to the first team squad.  Unless they believe hes innocent ofc

Expand  

 

That just made me think. I suspect our owners (and yours) might take quite the principled moral stance with a "rapist". Possibly more so than with an american owned club. 

 

ps. Not saying that Mendy is a rapist btw. In fact i suspect that he isn't. Given one of the women went back to his place several months after being raped and, whilst taking a shower in his bedroom, was raped again. Not read all the details but that one is dodgy as.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 17/08/2023 at 08:03, wykikitoon said:

I think with Mendy, he was on remand at one point wasn't he?

Expand  


So was Greenwood for 2 days after breaking his bail conditions iirc

 

The whole thing is a minefield tbh. Mendy, Greenwood, Ched Evans, David Goodwillie, the Arsenal midfielder, Sigurddson. Bramble and Dyer had their own brushes with the law in the not too distant past. All similar types of allegations. 

 

Some have been charged and then found not guilty, some have ended up in jail, some have had convictions overturned, some have been released without charge. Where's the line in the sand for who gets to carry on playing football and who doesn't?

 

Personally speaking, if Greenwood played for us, with the video evidence available I wouldn't want him anywhere near the club. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 17/08/2023 at 08:54, Kid Dynamite said:


So was Greenwood for 2 days after breaking his bail conditions iirc

 

The whole thing is a minefield tbh. Mendy, Greenwood, Ched Evans, David Goodwillie, the Arsenal midfielder, Sigurddson. Bramble and Dyer had their own brushes with the law in the not too distant past. All similar types of allegations. 

 

Some have been charged and then found not guilty, some have ended up in jail, some have had convictions overturned, some have been released without charge. Where's the line in the sand for who gets to carry on playing football and who doesn't?

 

Personally speaking, if Greenwood played for us, with the video evidence available I wouldn't want him anywhere near the club. 

Expand  

They should loan him to Besiktas and make it clear what he's done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 17/08/2023 at 12:06, RobinRobin said:

Criminal burden of proof is much higher. I would sack him and take my chances in court. 

Sunderland would take him. 

Expand  


That would be a win/win for any sensible club. Take the moral high ground, sack him, and if it gets overturned at court then Greenwood still ends up coming out of it looking worse than the club 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Callum Wilson on Chelsea's spending spree: "How many midfielders do they want? Let’s put this into context. Caicedo, I have not really seen much of him in midfield. We played against Brighton and he played at right-back against us. But for the price that he’s cost, you could get Tonali AND Guimaraes AND me!"

  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Footballers are on fixed term contracts so getting rid isn’t that tricky. To Man Utd it’s the thought of their “asset” going somewhere else for noting that is the thing. That and roll neck wrong un actually wanting him back in the squad, obvs . Morality and men who run football are strangers :cuppa:

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.