Jump to content

President Biden


Happy Face
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure if Trump's ever said he would cut the military or stop the interventionist policy. 

 

He has said several times that he would be pursuing a less interventionist policy. Which makes his statements on strengthening defence a bit strange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He has said several times that he would be pursuing a less interventionist policy. Which makes his statements on strengthening defence a bit strange.

 

Be interested in his wording on those promises.  Like I went on to say, I know he's moaned about the cost and suggested the occupied territories should pay for the pleasure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Be interested in his wording on those promises. Like I went on to say, I know he's moaned about the cost and suggested the occupied territories should pay for the pleasure.

What difference does it make what wording he's used? :lol:

 

He continually contradicts himself and talks utter shit. I'm surprised you haven't noticed this yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's governed as he campaigned more than any president I remember.

 

His words are important because being accurate about the least informed president ever is pivotal when his entire position is that opponents misrepresent the facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51% in NBC poll say media have been unfair on Trump. Only 41% view coverage as objective.

 

86% feel career politicians have reaped the benefits of the status quo at the cost of the people.

 

53% believe the dangers of a Trump presidency are exaggerated because elites feel threatened by the change he represents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Be interested in his wording on those promises.  Like I went on to say, I know he's moaned about the cost and suggested the occupied territories should pay for the pleasure.

 

 

"We will stop racing to topple" foreign governments "that we know nothing about," he recently told a crowd in Fayetteville, N.C. "We're guided by the lessons of history and a desire to promote stability — stability all over — and strength in our land. This destructive cycle of intervention and chaos must finally, folks, come to an end."

 

“We don’t want to have a depleted military because we’re all over the place fighting in areas that we shouldn’t be fighting in. It’s not going to be depleted any longer,”

 

“We will build up our military not as an act of aggression, but as an act of prevention,” he said. “In short we seek peace through strength.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51% in NBC poll say media have been unfair on Trump. Only 41% view coverage as objective.

 

86% feel career politicians have reaped the benefits of the status quo at the cost of the people.

 

53% believe the dangers of a Trump presidency are exaggerated because elites feel threatened by the change he represents.

Way to go MSM. Clearly winning the battle here...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems a bit like that fella off the West Wing said, "Republicans want a huge military but they don't want to send it anywhere. The Democrats wants a small military and they want to send it everywhere."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yo be fair to the "MSM", at least 60% of Americans are morons

 

I don't trust the MSM and I'm not in the same intelligence bracket as most of the people who voted for Trump. They really are losing the battle here, and it's because they're trying to direct public opinion rather than report it. I've seen them lie several times about Trump (usually by omission) and while you've attempted to defend them each time, I remain unconvinced. They are, as far as I can see, acting like the opposition party. Why they feel this is their place in the whole matter is entirely beyond me, as the more they do it, the more Trump can characterise them as the enemy. Turkeys and christmas come to mind.

Edited by Rayvin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's now said Obama is behind the leaks and protests.

 

Certifiable or very clever at pandering to morons. Or both.

 

I genuinely think he believes this stuff. Or rather, someone on his team will tell him this and he won't challenge it. Willful ignorance presumably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The question is how can the MSM report on that ignorance in a way that doesn't seem like they're trying to direct the debate. It's hard being fair and balanced when you're reporting on someone who's unfair and imbalanced. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't really be arsed to continue the debate about "they", as if the MSM is one collective entity.

 

All I know is the business I work in has very little to do with the crap you're posting, Rayvin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't trust the MSM and I'm not in the same intelligence bracket as most of the people who voted for Trump. They really are losing the battle here, and it's because they're trying to direct public opinion rather than report it. I've seen them lie several times about Trump (usually by omission) and while you've attempted to defend them each time, I remain unconvinced. They are, as far as I can see, acting like the opposition party. Why they feel this is their place in the whole matter is entirely beyond me, as the more they do it, the more Trump can characterise them as the enemy. Turkeys and christmas come to mind.

Okay then, give some clear examples of when this has happened. I'm not talking about editorials it opinion pieces, which are obviously subjective, I'm talking about factual copy in a quality broadsheet or media source such as the BBC.

 

There us however an obvious source of fake news which, like the American morons, appears to have you suckered up as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't really be arsed to continue the debate about "they", as if the MSM is one collective entity.

 

All I know is the business I work in has very little to do with the crap you're posting, Rayvin.

It reminds me of Parky where he patently doesn't understand the scientific method. When you work in that field, it's canny frustrating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's because you think I'm inferring some kind of conspiracy. As I've said before, it's about ideology. And look, you don't have to take my word for it apparently. The polls support the view that the MSM has lost touch in general - at some point, there will have to be a shift in how the media operates which will address this, or they will very literally become obsolete.

 

They allowed themselves to become a collective because almost all of them went for Trump. So he bundled them together, they all perpetuated their own overreactions and shitstorms, and thus they all came together into one collective entity. I would say this was the case but more subtle before Trump (collective in the sense of ideological alignment in a broad sense), but it looks more extreme since him.

 

Trump is outside of their Overton window. That's the issue IMO.

 

The question is how can the MSM report on that ignorance in a way that doesn't seem like they're trying to direct the debate. It's hard being fair and balanced when you're reporting on someone who's unfair and imbalanced. :lol:

 

They don't have to report on the ignorance. They have to do things such as give historical context behind some of the decisions made by Trump (i.e. Obama laid the groundwork, or this has happened in the past and is nothing new, etc). They haven't done that. They've treated each action as if it were a new 'assault' on their ideological beliefs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay then, give some clear examples of when this has happened. I'm not talking about editorials it opinion pieces, which are obviously subjective, I'm talking about factual copy in a quality broadsheet or media source such as the BBC.

 

There us however an obvious source of fake news which, like the American morons, appears to have you suckered up as well.

 

There is literally no point in me doing this. I've flagged it up multiple times in this thread already in the past few weeks. HF has done the same for different issues. You guys don't want to hear it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is literally no point in me doing this. I've flagged it up multiple times in this thread already in the past few weeks. HF has done the same for different issues. You guys don't want to hear it.

Really? Multiple examples of fake news made by quality media organisations?

 

Go on, humour me. Hit me with the best example of the fakiest news they have disseminated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Andrew changed the title to President Biden

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.