Park Life 71 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 The whole media war is a refraction of the me v the establishment meme. The real things are happening behind the scenes and we won't know much about it till much later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 (edited) So what? You're making a classic logical fallacy here. The fallacy was the MSM narrative in classic defensive mode. The monster is taking over....Build higher walls! Then the monster said he was building the walls. Trust me his team are controlling the narrative. Slick and shiny and you can't really get a handle on it. Edited February 17, 2017 by Park Life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted February 17, 2017 Author Share Posted February 17, 2017 My appraisal of Trump is changing. I initially thought his rhetoric was just a ploy to get him elected by the braindead masses. Now I'm coming to the conclusion that he's genuinely a moron with a personality disorder. It's scary to think that he could have ever got elected, I just hope the establishment mechanisms are sufficiently robust to stop him doing catastrophic damage. https://twitter.com/JohnBrownlow/status/831873539099734019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21627 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 Let's use Occam's razor here. He looks like a moron, he talks like a moron, he acts like a moron. He is a moron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15531 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 He's a moron but people don't mind. That's the crux. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 35095 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 Let's use Occam's razor here. He looks like a moron, he talks like a moron, he acts like a moron. He is a moron. Yep. It's also a frankly fucking ridiculous argument to try and say that because he became the Republic nomination then the President means it was all part of some master plan from the evil genius that is Donald Trump. It was a unique set of circumstances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21627 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 https://twitter.com/JohnBrownlow/status/831873539099734019 The comments are interesting. I'm no psychologist which is pretty much a pseudoscience anyway, but I diagnose he's a wrong un. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 35095 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 An election wynning wrong un Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 (edited) He's a moron but people don't mind. That's the crux. Yup. They analyzed the Bush and Reagan early months. All this stuff was said about both of them. Idiots, clueless, actor, no experience etc... He continues to position himself as the victim. He is anything but we know that.... Edited February 17, 2017 by Park Life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 35095 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 Yup. They analyzed the Bush and Reagan early months. All this stuff was said about both of them. Idiots, clueless, actor, no experience etc... They were both puppets tbh. And morons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 They were both puppets tbh. And morons Don't matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted February 17, 2017 Author Share Posted February 17, 2017 He's played up the rhetoric he has in order to win the states he could. Changing rhetoric now would lose him those states and not gain him any support whatsoever from his critics. Serving the interests of the wealthy now he's in must be counterbalanced by siding with his supporters against the media, the Mexicans, the Muslims. His supporters will forgive his corporate subservience if he maintains animosity against their biggest foes. None of that is to say he's clever. He's doing what the polling people tell him to and struggling to be coherent when he does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 He's laughing into his gold socks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 35095 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 Don't matter. I'm not suggesting it does, however you brought them up as a direct comparison to Trump, who you are also arguing is a clever manipulator who is playing people. You're not even remotely consistent in your own arguments which is why it's so transparent you're just after a few chomps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30620 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 He has a whole team behind him. He on purpose doesn't use prompter stands and looks down at bits of paper it's to make him look genuine. You've seen the state of the team behind him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 He's played up the rhetoric he has in order to win the states he could. Changing rhetoric now would lose him those states and not gain him any support whatsoever from his critics. Serving the interests of the wealthy now he's in must be counterbalanced by siding with his supporters against the media, the Mexicans, the Muslims. His supporters will forgive his corporate subservience if he maintains animosity against their biggest foes. None of that is to say he's clever. He's doing what the polling people tell him to and struggling to be coherent when he does. In a nutshell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 7030 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 Bollocks. He's textbook NPD. This professor of psychiatry disagrees Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30620 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 In a nutshell. So is he a genius or not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 35095 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 So is he a genius or not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 7030 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 The comments are interesting. I'm no psychologist which is pretty much a pseudoscience anyway, but I diagnose he's a wrong un. Sorry, just seen its already been posted. There's a big difference between psychiatrists (qualified doctors with extensive additional training) and psychologists Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 You've seen the state of the team behind him? I know mate. I still giggle that they got away with such flim flam. But there is some method there. The longer they can control the narrative the longer he can be kept out of harms way with reg to the real serious things which they probably have no idea what to do about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 So is he a genius or not? He's a classic psychopath IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30620 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 His approach certainly isn't as sophisticated and slick as you maintain. He's a chancer who is yet to realise that he isn't campaigning any more and that it's time to govern. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Park Life 71 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 (edited) His approach certainly isn't as sophisticated and slick as you maintain. He's a chancer who is yet to realise that he isn't campaigning any more and that it's time to govern. They haven't worked out how to govern so continue with what has worked in the past....This is his real weakness. If the press got on his case about serious Governance I don't think he has any insight or answers yet. So they will continue with the fireworks till they get some semblance of a coherent policy for the big issues. The big issues in America are endemic and almost impossible to deal with as you know. They will continue narratives that talk to their base. Edited February 17, 2017 by Park Life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21924 Posted February 17, 2017 Share Posted February 17, 2017 You're powers of analysis are so poor. /MSM I'm not even sure how to label your analysis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now