Rayvin 5188 Posted February 2, 2017 Share Posted February 2, 2017 As if he won't destroy them anyway. Â Quite possibly but what they're doing is more likely to bring about what they fear. Trump can't just make America a police state. He needs a reason to do it that will scan with the public. Enter Antifa. Â How long before we start seeing false flags on this as well... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21861 Posted February 2, 2017 Share Posted February 2, 2017 What's the latest then? Â TT would be dead without Trump. At least he's good for something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 34938 Posted February 2, 2017 Share Posted February 2, 2017 What's the latest then? Â TT would be dead without Trump. They said that about CT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 5188 Posted February 2, 2017 Share Posted February 2, 2017 Yeah, tempted to say at this point that even without Trump we'd find something to argue about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 34938 Posted February 2, 2017 Share Posted February 2, 2017 Yeah, tempted to say at this point that even without Trump we'd find something to argue about. No we wouldn't Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 5188 Posted February 2, 2017 Share Posted February 2, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21861 Posted February 2, 2017 Share Posted February 2, 2017 i told you once Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30385 Posted February 2, 2017 Share Posted February 2, 2017 There's going to be more of this to come. Â Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 5188 Posted February 2, 2017 Share Posted February 2, 2017 Who is advising Trump on counter terrorism and military objectives then? He sounds useless whoever he is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 34938 Posted February 2, 2017 Share Posted February 2, 2017 Who is advising Trump on counter terrorism and military objectives then? He sounds useless whoever he is. You think he's taking advice? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30385 Posted February 2, 2017 Share Posted February 2, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 5188 Posted February 2, 2017 Share Posted February 2, 2017 It'll not be Bannon though, it has to be someone on the military side. Worrying really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44540 Posted February 2, 2017 Share Posted February 2, 2017 Who is advising Trump on counter terrorism and military objectives then? He sounds useless whoever he is.Baron Trump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30385 Posted February 2, 2017 Share Posted February 2, 2017 It'll not be Bannon though, it has to be someone on the military side. Worrying really. Â Bannon controls all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 5188 Posted February 2, 2017 Share Posted February 2, 2017 I see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10793 Posted February 2, 2017 Share Posted February 2, 2017 It'll not be Bannon though, it has to be someone on the military side. Worrying really. I wouldn't be surprised if he recieved intel and advice from the military, then he'll talk to his political advisors who shape the decisions that further their agenda regardless of the advice and counsel of the military. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44540 Posted February 2, 2017 Share Posted February 2, 2017 Trump doesn't strike me as a man to listen to advice from anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30385 Posted February 2, 2017 Share Posted February 2, 2017 (edited) Bannon sits on the NSC ffs. Despite a lack of ANY relevant experience. Edited February 2, 2017 by ewerk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44540 Posted February 2, 2017 Share Posted February 2, 2017 If U.C. Berkeley does not allow free speech and practices violence on innocent people with a different point of view - NO FEDERAL FUNDS? Â His latest tweet. When will this cunt die? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 5188 Posted February 2, 2017 Share Posted February 2, 2017 I wouldn't be surprised if he recieved intel and advice from the military, then he'll talk to his political advisors who shape the decisions that further their agenda regardless of the advice and counsel of the military. Â That may be true but the issue at hand is that their intelligence was wrong. I suppose it's possible they were given a report that estimated resistance and noted that further reconnaissance was needed, and simply chose to ignore it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 5188 Posted February 2, 2017 Share Posted February 2, 2017 If U.C. Berkeley does not allow free speech and practices violence on innocent people with a different point of view - NO FEDERAL FUNDS?  His latest tweet. When will this cunt die?  We covered that on the previous page  It's a bizarre thing to say, especially since Berkeley seemed to be acting out of a desire to protect people rather than make a political point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 30385 Posted February 2, 2017 Share Posted February 2, 2017 That may be true but the issue at hand is that their intelligence was wrong. I suppose it's possible they were given a report that estimated resistance and noted that further reconnaissance was needed, and simply chose to ignore it. Â There's no evidence that the intel was wrong per se, it seems that they jumped the gun before they had the chance to complete their intel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gemmill 44540 Posted February 2, 2017 Share Posted February 2, 2017 Oh you covered it on the previous page, did you? Hows about you S my presidential Bs on this page, mothertrucker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 5188 Posted February 2, 2017 Share Posted February 2, 2017 There's no evidence that the intel was wrong per se, it seems that they jumped the gun before they had the chance to complete their intel. Â Does seem feasible actually given that it was an operation that Obama prepped, presumably some time ago. I guess the likelihood of 'things changing' was lost on the decision making team. This must be more on Mattis than anyone else though, isn't this stuff basically what he's there for? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish 10793 Posted February 2, 2017 Share Posted February 2, 2017 That may be true but the issue at hand is that their intelligence was wrong. I suppose it's possible they were given a report that estimated resistance and noted that further reconnaissance was needed, and simply chose to ignore it. Was their intelligence wrong? We have no idea what they told him, whether he paid any attention to it, whether he demanded a blood & thunder plan to get the bad dudes instead of wishy washy hanging around for another meeting about boring intelligence? Â What we do know is that he's their commander in chief and if he orders them to go get those baddies that's what they must do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now