beetlejuice 7 Posted Sunday at 07:39 Share Posted Sunday at 07:39 Look at how you treated CT in his early forum years like a poisonous little faction that holds the forum down. Forced to leave. Good to see him back and barely venturing into any politics discussions. Who wouldn't want to align with whatever you're spouting? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holden McGroin 7826 Posted Sunday at 07:40 Share Posted Sunday at 07:40 Just now, beetlejuice said: Look at how you treated CT in his early forum years like a poisonous little faction that holds the forum down. Forced to leave. Good to see him back and barely venturing into any politics discussions. Who wouldn't want to align with whatever you're spouting? CT was a windup merchant to start with. That’s why he was named Contrary Tree. Maybe one day you can turn it around and become a forum legend…. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beetlejuice 7 Posted Sunday at 07:43 Share Posted Sunday at 07:43 1 minute ago, Holden McGroin said: CT was a windup merchant to start with. That’s why he was named Contrary Tree. Maybe one day you can turn it around and become a forum legend…. By definition, anybody that goes against the left wing at all costs rhetoric is going to be contrary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holden McGroin 7826 Posted Sunday at 07:46 Share Posted Sunday at 07:46 2 minutes ago, beetlejuice said: By definition, anybody that goes against the left wing at all costs rhetoric is going to be contrary. CT would be contrary about everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 37560 Posted Sunday at 07:48 Share Posted Sunday at 07:48 CT joined the forum and was not only pro-Ashley but also an advocate of giving Wise the manager’s job in the wake of Keegan going. So definitely not just a contrarian attention seeker in the early days Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beetlejuice 7 Posted Sunday at 07:52 Share Posted Sunday at 07:52 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Alex said: CT joined the forum and was not only pro-Ashley but also an advocate of giving Wise the manager’s job in the wake of Keegan going. So definitely not just a contrarian attention seeker in the early days Given he didn't have dementia, not the worst of our available options 😄 Edited Sunday at 07:52 by beetlejuice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 7883 Posted Sunday at 08:18 Share Posted Sunday at 08:18 Didn't Quiff get banned because he filed loads of FOI requests against the forum to be a cunt? Shortly after having a meltdown on here because his lass left him? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 33812 Posted Sunday at 08:21 Share Posted Sunday at 08:21 41 minutes ago, beetlejuice said: Look at how you treated CT in his early forum years like a poisonous little faction that holds the forum down. Forced to leave. Good to see him back and barely venturing into any politics discussions. Who wouldn't want to align with whatever you're spouting? You seem to know an awful lot about the history of this board given that you only joined on Wednesday. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beetlejuice 7 Posted Sunday at 08:23 Share Posted Sunday at 08:23 1 minute ago, ewerk said: You seem to know an awful lot about the history of this board given that you only joined on Wednesday. Read for years and years, horseshoe. Wish I hadn't stuck my head above the parapet now though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Hermione 14955 Posted Sunday at 08:27 Share Posted Sunday at 08:27 Of all the threads to start in 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 37560 Posted Sunday at 08:27 Share Posted Sunday at 08:27 Incels gonna incel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beetlejuice 7 Posted Sunday at 08:29 Share Posted Sunday at 08:29 Just now, Alex said: Incels gonna incel Well either they're gonna incel or successfully devise a plan to pop rounds at a president in view of the secret service. 😉 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 37560 Posted Sunday at 08:35 Share Posted Sunday at 08:35 6 minutes ago, Ayatollah Hermione said: Of all the threads to start in Just the level of subtlety you’d expect from Chris Kamagra 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beetlejuice 7 Posted Sunday at 08:59 Share Posted Sunday at 08:59 Told you all I'm left wing. I stand by civil service cuts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 6289 Posted Sunday at 09:20 Share Posted Sunday at 09:20 3 hours ago, beetlejuice said: You think that gimp outwitted the secret service on his own? His room at home had been surgically cleaned too. For a bunch of chaps that I've always liked for challenging official narratives you're behind the curve on this one. You think anyone competent would choose that gimp to assassinate someone? Also, here's the real problem with this whole nonsense - Trump has replaced key people in all arms of institutions like the FBI and the military. Why isn't he making a big deal about this himself? That was actually the odd thing for me all the way through, how little attention Trump himself paid to the fact he was almost killed. He hardly even mentions it. Why is that? Given he spends so much time talking about conspiracies, laptops, emails, supposed crimes committed by the Democrats, you'd think this one would be right up there. But it's not. I'm prepared to believe someone put this kid up to this, not that we have evidence of that beyond wild speculation. I'm not prepared to believe you have any fucking clue at all that it was the Democrats. The fact Trump survived it is probably the single biggest argument that it wasn't organised by anyone competent btw - why would they risk that entire situation in the hands of an untrained teenager? I'm all for challenging official narratives but that doesn't mean you can just claim any old nonsense is true - if Trump was a real security risk to the US state, and the Democrats had wanted him gone, they'd have had him killed in his bed. Hell he's so generally unwell they could have claimed an illness took him and poisoned him. Why would they choose a 20 year old kid who can't shoot straight? Come on man... And as a final comment - the evidence seems to be that the Democrats lost because they couldn't mobilise their own voters, not because Trump did so amazingly well. So even if they did try to have him assassinated, it isn't the reason they failed. They failed because they're just another right wing party who attempt to protect the status quo, and many of their voters ran out of patience with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beetlejuice 7 Posted Sunday at 09:29 Share Posted Sunday at 09:29 (edited) Well they ween't going to get an intelligent person to agree to do it were they ? Re the rest of your post, I'm not defending trump I'm just musing on causation on why he happened. And the answer I arrive at is because of Denocrats. Edited Sunday at 09:30 by beetlejuice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 7883 Posted Sunday at 09:46 Share Posted Sunday at 09:46 The answer is because Musk bought Twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobinRobin 12770 Posted Sunday at 10:00 Share Posted Sunday at 10:00 @Andrew Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 45960 Posted Sunday at 13:00 Share Posted Sunday at 13:00 5 hours ago, Alex said: Not for the first time in his life, he needs to realise it’s over and to move on. His ex’s OF page is still gloriously filthy, mind. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 45960 Posted Sunday at 13:02 Share Posted Sunday at 13:02 4 hours ago, beetlejuice said: Told you all I'm left wing. I stand by civil service cuts. Must be tough in the RW stronghold of Teeside, how did you cope when the riots were going on? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beetlejuice 7 Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago (edited) On 13/04/2025 at 09:18, Kid Dynamite said: Didn't Quiff get banned because he filed loads of FOI requests against the forum to be a cunt? Shortly after having a meltdown on here because his lass left him? No, Quiff was banned because Ant was being a clever cunt threatening to dox and be malicious with his data. Quiff responded with a (single) Subject Access Request (not a FOI request and not "loads"). Which made Ant play the victim and flounce in order to, successfully, get the sympathy vote. Quiff withdrew his request and was reasonable throughout but Ant neglected to disclose this. Ant barely posted anyway so weaponised his exit to vilify Quiff. Is what I heard happened. Quiff lost a lot of respect for a lot of people he considered friends over it. Edited 19 hours ago by beetlejuice 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beetlejuice 7 Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago On 13/04/2025 at 14:00, Monkeys Fist said: His ex’s OF page is still gloriously filthy, mind. Given the size of her beak and how much room it must take up on photos I hope you're being discounted accordingly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beetlejuice 7 Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago Quiff also was framed as a conspiracy theorist over Covid origins! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrTickleAndy 0 Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago Hehe banned again. Laters losers. Alpha Andy and his high T muscle mass doing his bullying online. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrTickleAndy 0 Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago People like @Christmas Tree warched on in silence after I championed his cause at the treatment he got of the baying geek mob as well. Fat coward. Have some honour. I expect it from Mr Tickle and the gay. They need to project because they've got chips on their shoulders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now