Jump to content

Generic small time football blather thread 2015/16


The Fish
 Share

Recommended Posts

Answer the question, you fucking bore.

Prior to the offer of £50,000 he never mentioned anything about what she said during sex or that they were intimate 3 times and she forgot each time. Now if you want to support a man who sneaks into a bedroom has sex with a drunk girl without speaking to her before during or after then sneaks out again then you do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got no time for the women who stand by these types either mind. At the very least he's shagging everything that moves. Or he was

 

It's a strange one because she isn't even with him for his money. She just seems to be genuinely sticking him for love despite the fact that he's made a mug out of her. Clearly that love is a bit one-sided.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got no time for the women who stand by these types either mind. At the very least he's shagging everything that moves. Or he was

 

The weird thing with her is that it doesn't sound as though she needs his money or anything. She must just genuinely care for the guy. I mean, hasn't her father funded his whole defense?

 

They were together when this happened, I'm sure.

 

EDIT - Dammit ewerk.

Edited by Rayvin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fuck me.  Is this just me, being me or what.

Man Yoo goto Anfield and everyone is jizzing saying its another famous night at Anfield and it turns out to a bag of boring dour shite.  Then all cunts like Savage and co say is its because of Mourhino's negative tactics.

Why is it just his and his teams fault?  There is another manager with 11 of his players on the pitch.  They couldnt get past Man Yoo, they set up shite in the first half so why is that Mourhino's fault?  Is the fairy tale of Klopp winning the league starting wain you fucking sycophants.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fuck me.  Is this just me, being me or what.

 

Man Yoo goto Anfield and everyone is jizzing saying its another famous night at Anfield and it turns out to a bag of boring dour shite.  Then all cunts like Savage and co say is its because of Mourhino's negative tactics.

 

Why is it just his and his teams fault?  There is another manager with 11 of his players on the pitch.  They couldnt get past Man Yoo, they set up shite in the first half so why is that Mourhino's fault?  Is the fairy tale of Klopp winning the league starting wain you fucking sycophants.

 

Not to defend savage since he's an appalling turd but mourinho has previous, especially in big games.

 

Klopp at least typically attacks games in a way mourinho never has.

 

Also mourinho is a massive wank and Klopp seems to have something resembling a decent personality so I'm somewhat more willing to let him off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest, I don't mind Mourinho's Man Utd going to Klopp's Anfield and grinding out a draw. If Man Utd tried to go toe to toe with the high pressing, high intensity Liverpool they'd likely come unstuck. So it makes sense to set up "negatively". I don't mind the media bigging up the fixture; these are two of the world's biggest clubs and they've a staggering reach across the globe.

 

The problem was the way the game was sold to the public. Everyone knew it wasn't going to be a slugfest, everyone expected Mourinho to shut up shop, so why the fuck wasn't it promoted as a tactical battle? Actually discuss the systems in play, have commentators who can succinctly explain why Mourinho's formation/system is nullifying Klopp's, which players are key to this, can it be sustained for 90 minutes etc. 

 

No, it isn't as interesting as breathless exultations on a hell-for-leather 4-3 between two teams going for it, but you can't put a dress on a pig and call it pretty. So you might as well talk about how the bacon tastes.

 

 

In totally unrelated news I'm going to have a sausage sandwich for lunch. :good:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, it isn't as interesting as breathless exultations on a hell-for-leather 4-3 between two teams going for it, but you can't put a dress on a pig and call it pretty. So you might as well talk about how the bacon tastes.

 

So mass media doesnt always call things the way they are?  :o :panic: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know if it got a mention on here but yesterday was 20 years to the day since we beat Man Utd 5-0.

 

Even if you forget about the opposition, that was some of the most scintillating football I've ever seen. A brilliant match filled with incidents, great goals and great play. Always remember the goal that should have been, came from a move involving Beardsley, Ginola, Batty and Ferdinand and if he'd scored Batty's would have been better than Albert's imo. 

 

Here it is.

 

https://youtu.be/ofK3WwdUZHo?t=432

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Guest locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.