essembeeofsunderland 811 Posted October 13, 2016 Share Posted October 13, 2016 And read and obeyed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21566 Posted October 13, 2016 Share Posted October 13, 2016 by nobody, ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 34280 Posted October 13, 2016 Share Posted October 13, 2016 Read, unfortunately Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15198 Posted October 13, 2016 Share Posted October 13, 2016 You didn't have to Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
essembeeofsunderland 811 Posted October 13, 2016 Share Posted October 13, 2016 He did,and you.Lest we forget.Wear your poppy with pride. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21566 Posted October 13, 2016 Share Posted October 13, 2016 ....as long as there's no football connection, or essembee will send the boys around Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15198 Posted October 13, 2016 Share Posted October 13, 2016 Remembrance only counts if you do it exactly right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 41520 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 He did,and you.Lest we forget.Wear your poppy with pride.Poppy? Pride? Fabulous, dahling! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 34280 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 27th March, 1970. The day Niall Quinn was arrested after drunkenly commandeering an EasyJet plane. Lest we forget Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anorthernsoul 1221 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 I see Ched Evans has been found not guilty on re-trial. Does that mean the girl involved committed a crime? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex 34280 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 29808 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 I said all along it seemed a strange conviction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anorthernsoul 1221 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 CPS stitch up from the start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 29808 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 It does seem a shame that he has had so many years of his career taken from him and irreparable damage to his reputation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeys Fist 41520 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Mackems are short of strikers, aren't they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 6896 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 (edited) A lot of people hammered him at the time, and his lass for daring to suggest the girl involved might have been exaggerating. Just about every paper had the whole family down as moral pariahs and hounded him out of every club that offered him a second chance Does this all change now? He still took a pissed lass home and shagged her after his mate. A different jury just happens to think he's got implied consent this time round Be interesting to see how the papers handle it Edited October 14, 2016 by StraightEdgeWizard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ewerk 29808 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Aye I was thinking about that earlier. What he did was undoubtedly poor form but obviously didn't merit being sent to prison and losing his career. I remember Henry Winter, who I normally have a lot of time for, being particularly sanctimonious on the subject. He hasn't uttered a word about it on Twitter this afternoon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adios 717 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 27th March, 1970. The day Niall Quinn was arrested after drunkenly commandeering an EasyJet plane. Lest we forget My actual birthday as it happens; clearly a closet Mackem. #FTM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaddockLad 16723 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 A lot of people hammered him at the time, and his lass for daring to suggest the girl involved might have been exaggerating. Just about every paper had the whole family down as moral pariahs and hounded him out of every club that offered him a second chance Does this all change now? He still took a pissed lass home and shagged her after his mate. A different jury just happens to think he's got implied consent this time round Be interesting to see how the papers handle it The defence was allowed to speak to her previous sexual partners and do a "contrast and compare" thing between what they said and what Evans said she did in bed. Fuck knows how the judge allowed that. The whole situation is clearly right in the middle of a very grey area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS 4281 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 (edited) It stemmed on the fact she used the phrase "fuck me harder" which was deemed to show she was in control or at least she thought it was a "normal" shag for her. They also suggested the fact that she shagged one of them two weeks after the incident showed it wasn't traumatic. Thing is there's suggestions the two blokes were primed with the phrases etc for the reward. It's dodgy as others will try the same in other cases. Edited October 14, 2016 by NJS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strawb 4100 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 He denied speaking to her, prior, during or after the sex. Where does the consent come from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGingerQuiff 2412 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Why is the onus on the man? If they didn't speak he didn't consent either Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Hermione 13691 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 Why is the onus on the man? If they didn't speak he didn't consent either Genuinely can't tell if this is a wind-up or not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGingerQuiff 2412 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 I find the concept of verbally agreeing to have sex beforehand a hilarious suggestion thought of by people that don't have sex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 32125 Posted October 14, 2016 Share Posted October 14, 2016 I find the concept of verbally agreeing to have sex beforehand a necessary evil when I arrange what kind of sex I want with Eastern European prostitutes called Nadia.The time taken, however, does allow extra time for the Kamagra to kick in so it's not all bad. (Until the bairn wakes up wanting feeding!) Lol. Different strokes for different folks, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts