Jump to content

John Carver Football Genius


Anorthernsoul
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

JC Newcastle United 1 January 2015[19] Present 19 2 4 13 10.53

 

CR Queens Park Rangers 2 February 2015 Present 14 3 2 9 21.43%

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JC Newcastle United 1 January 2015[19] Present 19 2 4 13 10.53

 

CR Queens Park Rangers 2 February 2015 Present 14 3 2 9 21.43%

 

 

 

Hold on, were you not the twat telling us QPR would be gifting us a point at least?

CT has a new challenger for the flip flop title.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Hold on, were you not the twat telling us QPR would be gifting us a point at least?

CT has a new challenger for the flip flop title.

 

You've missed the point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fish is trying to tell us that Ramsey is twice the coach Carver is.

 

Just more evidence that he's had some kind of bang on the head.

No I'm not.

 

Thanks for only using one sentence to get across a simple point though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No I'm not.

 

Thanks for only using one sentence to get across a simple point though.

 

Fish is a twat. Short enough for you?

 

All I see is some figures showing Ramsey won twice as many games as Carver, the inference appears clear. Maybe if you added some words to your posts, people might have a fucking clue what you were on about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Fish is a twat. Short enough for you?

 

All I see is some figures showing Ramsey won twice as many games as Carver, the inference appears clear. Maybe if you added some words to your posts, people might have a fucking clue what you were on about.

 

much better :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Lads, you're all fucked now. Mako just told me to use more words;

 

 

Fish is a twat. Short enough for you?

 

All I see is some figures showing Ramsey won twice as many games as Carver, the inference appears clear. Maybe if you added some words to your posts, people might have a fucking clue what you were on about.

 

My point, dear boy, was that QPR will take a risk on Chris Ramsey as he has done better within the restrictions he inherited than Carver has, as evidenced by his record. Not that he was going to gift us points, nor that he's twice the coach that Carver is. Just that, simply put, he's a better fit for QPR than Carver is for us.

 

Their ambitions, structure, model and allure are significantly different to ours own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep reading that Carver has been guaranteed a coaching roll,whoever is manager next season.So if Carver is not going to be manager next season,the new head coach will not even have a say in who he wants on the coaching staff.

If we did go down we will need someone who knows his way around the Championship.Mick McCarthy could be a decent choice .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Their ambitions, structure, model and allure are significantly different to ours own.

 

I assume you mean this last bit in the sense that these are things QPR possess that we don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep reading that Carver has been guaranteed a coaching roll,whoever is manager next season.So if Carver is not going to be manager next season,the new head coach will not even have a say in who he wants on the coaching staff.

If we did go down we will need someone who knows his way around the Championship.Mick McCarthy could be a decent choice .

 

Are you...are you serious?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You think that QPR are right to appoint Ramsey?

 

Depends if they change other facets of their club.

 

Hopefully they've learned that spending a fortune on has-beens doesn't work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep reading that Carver has been guaranteed a coaching roll,whoever is manager next season.So if Carver is not going to be manager next season,the new head coach will not even have a say in who he wants on the coaching staff.

If we did go down we will need someone who knows his way around the Championship.Mick McCarthy could be a decent choice .

 

:spit:

 

Get fucked, you troll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Depends if they change other facets of their club.

 

Hopefully they've learned that spending a fortune on has-beens doesn't work.

 

Clearly they haven't learnt much if they're giving the job to a man who has won just three games as manager in his entire career. It's a huge risk they're taking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Clearly they haven't learnt much if they're giving the job to a man who has won just three games as manager in his entire career. It's a huge risk they're taking.

 

Like I said, if they sweep out the over-priced shit and try and build a club, I think he's a steady hand to steer them through the change. He's not a good tactician, but he'll be enough to keep them in the Championship where it seems like you have to actively try and get relegated.

 

If they spunk millions on washed-up mercenaries then, no, he's not going to cut it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Like I said, if they sweep out the over-priced shit and try and build a club, I think he's a steady hand to steer them through the change. He's not a good tactician, but he'll be enough to keep them in the Championship where it seems like you have to actively try and get relegated.

 

If they spunk millions on washed-up mercenaries then, no, he's not going to cut it.

 

I would have thought that the aim would have been to get back up first time round? A lot of their older mercenaries are out of contract so getting rid of most of the shit won't be difficult. They're giving the job to a man who has presided over a disastrous run with no experience of recruitment, seems like a massive gamble to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I would have thought that the aim would have been to get back up first time round? A lot of their older mercenaries are out of contract so getting rid of most of the shit won't be difficult. They're giving the job to a man who has presided over a disastrous run with no experience of recruitment, seems like a massive gamble to me.

 

Probably, the short-termism in football is staggering. Can't see that happening though, so they're better off with a known quantity while they sort out everything else.

 

Mind you, I didn't realise it was a 3yr deal at first. Now that is a daft risk, they would have been better off giving him a 2yr.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.