Jump to content

January Transfers 2015


salsaman7
 Share

Recommended Posts

Anyone heard if any loan fees involved ??

 

Ashley (via SD) loans "The Rangers" money to keep the lights on, yet any fees for these players come to NUFC (i.e. Ashley) so he could be actually using up some of those emergency loans to pay himself back via the NUFC player fees and wages savings, but (and this is the good bit) Rangers would still owe him the full amount. Which is delicious if it's what he's doing.

 

Fact is you just know it will be like the billboard St James is for his tat stores, no monetary value will be given to those players going to Rangers, just like he pays nothing to advertise Sports Direct.
Ashley idea of balancing the books is only when he can whisk it out of the club's account and even then his mouth pieces never seem to subtract what he's taken back from the "debt".
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 412
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Fact is you just know it will be like the billboard St James is for his tat stores, no monetary value will be given to those players going to Rangers, just like he pays nothing to advertise Sports Direct.

Ashley idea of balancing the books is only when he can whisk it out of the club's account and even then his mouth pieces never seem to subtract what he's taken back from the "debt".

That's why who is paying for the loan players is important.

 

It doesn't appear to be to Ashley's benefit to do TRFC a favour, it would seem to be in his interest to have them owe him more money as he is in firmer control over what makes money (or what has value) increases.

 

They are overspending (losing) £800K a month, that shortfall is covered by loans from SD secured on the retail business (which is profitable) and all the assets of worth of TRFC (excluding £1brox).

 

If TRFC are paying for the loaned players they are using the money loaned by SD (Ashley), so in effect are paying NUFC (Ashley) for the privilege, but not reducing, but likely increasing, their indebtedness to SD (Ashley).

 

If NUFC are picking up the tab, that would be outrageous and would certainly increase evidence of undue influence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does it really matter who is paying their wages? It all comes out of the same pocket.

It matters hugely.

 

If it's out of Rangers pocket their debt to SD increases via putting more money into Ashley via NUFC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much of London is, aye.

Yeah, that really smarts. :lol:

An actual sweaty rather than a plastic one (presumably you've temporarily swapped your ten gallon hat for a Tam o' Shanter) would probably laugh it off anarl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, that really smarts. :lol:

An actual sweaty rather than a plastic one (presumably you've temporarily swapped your ten gallon hat for a Tam o' Shanter) would probably laugh it off anarl.

I enjoy yanking chains

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.