Dr Gloom 21915 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 8 minutes ago, Kid Dynamite said: Aye but you would crawl through broken glass just to sniff May's shit so it's hardly a balanced opinion This whole "Pray for London" shit that is all ower Facebook after these attacks does my tits in btw All religion is mumbo jumbo, true, but what's the problem with people expressing solidarity right now - even if it is via a moronic religion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21915 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 3 minutes ago, NJS said: They won't risk the arms industry by mentioning the backers by name. Tragic innit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21915 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 16 minutes ago, goldeena said: i agree with katie hopkins and farrage, just interested to know what people think we should do because all i have seen up to now is 'live with it' ? Invest more in security and surveillance to restrict coordinated attacks. An attack every few years is one thing, if an attack every weeks or months becomes the new normal then a change in approach is required. But, to an extent you have to live with it. Who can stop someone mowing down civilians in a vehicle? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14011 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 45 minutes ago, Christmas Tree said: I think May was pretty spot on. WELL IMAGINE MY SHOCK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 2 hours ago, PaddockLad said: Bit of a cliche to say and possibly inappropriate but for me that's us, that's the spirit of ordinary British folk. In my parents lifetime we've had the blitz and a quarter of a century of the IRA. We're not easily cowed by psychopaths. Not that any of that is any consolation to the victims and anyone connected to them this morning Think we've adopted a very American attitude as a society. Before we had "The troubles" and "keep calm and carry on". Now it's "war on terror" and "run, hide, tell". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 5217 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 1 minute ago, Happy Face said: Think we've adopted a very American attitude as a society. Before we had "The troubles" and "keep calm and carry on". Now it's "war on terror" and "run, hide, tell". I think a lot of that comes from Twitter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 5217 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 11 minutes ago, goldeena said: why have the police got their hands tied when you get this horrific list of prior knowledge on them once they have commited their attrocities, trying to thing about it scientifically that cuts through the sway. By the sounds of it, the government hasn't given them the resources they need. At least that was the feedback after Manchester. This is the problem with cutting back the state. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 5217 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 (edited) 3 minutes ago, goldeena said: but they already know who they are and it has everything to do with law. Ah you're saying why don't they lock them all up? Probably because they haven't actually committed a crime at the point of being 'on the list'. We can't just bend the rules to get around that point. To do so would compromise our values and way of life. Edited June 4, 2017 by Rayvin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 5217 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 Just now, goldeena said: no. i am saying that the law is an ass because it has got in the way of red flashing lights prolfically - the law as it stands is not equipped to deal with extreme muslim terrorism. What would you have it do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 Goldeena lying in deep bath with her sisters, plugged into the GCHQ email and web search database, identifying people to take out before they do owt wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 5217 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 Just now, goldeena said: i would have it operate on a basis of probable outcomes. That sounds an awful lot like what I said in my previous post. You would have them arrested before they commit a crime. Minority Report style? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 5217 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 2 minutes ago, Happy Face said: Goldeena lying in deep bath with her sisters, plugged into the GCHQ email and web search database, identifying people to take out before they do owt wrong. Exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 2 minutes ago, goldeena said: on the basis of probable outcomes cuts through the sway. Should we ban you now based on the probable outcome? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 5217 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 2 minutes ago, goldeena said: on the basis of probable outcomes cuts through the sway. And what do we do with them? What do we hold them for, and for how long? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renton 21609 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 2 minutes ago, goldeena said: on the basis of probable outcomes cuts through the sway. On the basis of probability you're a stupid cunt. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15524 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 All is well. Londoners gonna Lond. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21915 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 What's wrong with run, hide tell? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvin 5217 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 1 minute ago, goldeena said: but if intelligence sees s red light it should be seen as a probable outcome. But what would we do with them? Hold them indefinitely? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 33166 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 We've got goldeena He's not from Argentina He's here for a bite, Don't reply to his shite. @Rayvin @The Fish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face 29 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 2 minutes ago, Dr Gloom said: What's wrong with run, hide tell? I didn't say either response was right or wrong. PL was saying how people had confronted the attackers with bottles and that, which flies in the face of what has to be police advice. No-one should be expected to do anything but get to somewhere safe, but the 'United 93' type response to jeopardise your own safety is something that should be applauded though, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howmanheyman 33166 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 Is this the terrorism thread or the Werther's original one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meenzer 15524 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 Nothing especially original about it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom 14011 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 6 minutes ago, Meenzer said: Nothing especially original about it *Round of applause* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Dynamite 7025 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 3 minutes ago, goldeena said: they have everything intellogence - statistical models and everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Gloom 21915 Posted June 4, 2017 Share Posted June 4, 2017 23 minutes ago, Happy Face said: I didn't say either response was right or wrong. PL was saying how people had confronted the attackers with bottles and that, which flies in the face of what has to be police advice. No-one should be expected to do anything but get to somewhere safe, but the 'United 93' type response to jeopardise your own safety is something that should be applauded though, right? The police did exactly that in their statement tbf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now